Li Meng, Chen Shengqi, Lai Yunfeng, Liang Zuanji, Wang Jiaqi, Shi Junnan, Lin Haojie, Yao Dongning, Hu Hao, Ung Carolina Oi Lam
State Key Laboratory in Quality Research of Chinese Medicine, Institute of Chinese Medical Sciences, University of Macau, Macao, China.
Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 May 31;8:669509. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.669509. eCollection 2021.
Real world evidence (RWE) and real-world data (RWD) are drawing ever-increasing attention in the pharmaceutical industry and drug regulatory authorities (DRAs) all over the world due to their paramount role in supporting drug development and regulatory decision making. However, there is little systematic documentary analysis about how RWE was integrated for the use by the DRAs in evaluating new treatment approaches and monitoring post-market safety. This study aimed to analyze and discuss the integration of RWE into regulatory decision-making process from the perspective of DRAs. Different development strategies to develop and adopt RWE by the DRAs in the US, Europe, and China were reviewed and compared, and the challenges encountered were discussed. It was found that different strategies on development of RWE were applied by FDA, EMA, and NMPA. The extent to which RWE was adopted in China was relatively limited compared to that in the US and EU, which was highly related to the national pharmaceutical environment and development stages. A better understanding of the overall goals, inputs, activities, outputs, and outcomes in developing RWE will help inform actions to harness RWD and leverage RWE for better health care decisions.
真实世界证据(RWE)和真实世界数据(RWD)在支持药物研发和监管决策方面发挥着至关重要的作用,因此在全球制药行业和药品监管机构(DRA)中受到越来越多的关注。然而,关于监管机构如何整合真实世界证据以用于评估新治疗方法和监测上市后安全性,几乎没有系统的文献分析。本研究旨在从监管机构的角度分析和讨论真实世界证据融入监管决策过程的情况。回顾并比较了美国、欧洲和中国的监管机构开发和采用真实世界证据的不同发展策略,并讨论了所遇到的挑战。研究发现,美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)、欧洲药品管理局(EMA)和中国国家药品监督管理局(NMPA)采用了不同的真实世界证据开发策略。与美国和欧盟相比,中国采用真实世界证据的程度相对有限,这与国家制药环境和发展阶段高度相关。更好地理解开发真实世界证据的总体目标、投入因素、活动、产出和结果,将有助于为利用真实世界数据和借助真实世界证据做出更好的医疗保健决策提供行动依据。