Lee R, Skinner A, Bornstein M H, Radford A N, Campbell A, Graham K, Pearson R M
Centre for Academic Mental Health, School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, United Kingdom.
MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit at the University of Bristol, United Kingdom.
Infant Behav Dev. 2017 May;47:62-71. doi: 10.1016/j.infbeh.2017.02.006. Epub 2017 Mar 25.
To explore the utility of first-person viewpoint cameras at home, for recording mother and infant behaviour, and for reducing problems associated with participant reactivity, which represent a fundamental bias in observational research.
We compared footage recording the same play interactions from a traditional third-person point of view (3rd PC) and using cameras worn on headbands (first-person cameras [1st PCs]) to record first-person points of view of mother and infant simultaneously. In addition, we left the dyads alone with the 1st PCs for a number of days to record natural mother-child behaviour at home. Fifteen mothers with infants (3-12 months of age) provided a total of 14h of footage at home alone with the 1st PCs.
Codings of maternal behaviour from footage of the same scenario captured from 1st PCs and 3rd PCs showed high concordance (kappa >0.8). Footage captured by the 1st PCs also showed strong inter-rater reliability (kappa=0.9). Data from 1st PCs during sessions recorded alone at home captured more 'negative' maternal behaviours per min than observations using 1st PCs whilst a researcher was present (mean difference=0.90 (95% CI 0.5-1.2, p<0.001 representing 1.5 SDs).
1st PCs offer a number of practical advantages and can reliably record maternal and infant behaviour. This approach can also record a higher frequency of less socially desirable maternal behaviours. It is unclear whether this difference is due to lack of need of the presence of researcher or the increased duration of recordings. This finding is potentially important for research questions aiming to capture more ecologically valid behaviours and reduce demand characteristics.
探讨家用第一人称视角摄像头在记录母婴行为以及减少与参与者反应性相关问题方面的效用,这些问题是观察性研究中的一个基本偏差。
我们比较了从传统第三人称视角(3rd PC)记录相同游戏互动的录像,以及使用头带式摄像头(第一人称摄像头[1st PCs])同时记录母婴第一人称视角的录像。此外,我们让母婴二人组单独使用第一人称摄像头几天,以记录家中自然的母婴行为。15位有3至12个月大婴儿的母亲在家中单独使用第一人称摄像头共提供了14小时的录像。
从第一人称摄像头和第三人称摄像头捕捉的相同场景录像中对母亲行为进行编码,结果显示高度一致(kappa>0.8)。第一人称摄像头捕捉的录像也显示出很强的评分者间信度(kappa=0.9)。与研究人员在场时使用第一人称摄像头的观察相比,在家中单独记录期间第一人称摄像头的数据每分钟捕捉到更多“负面”母亲行为(平均差异=0.90(95%CI 0.5-1.2,p<0.001,代表1.5个标准差)。
第一人称摄像头具有许多实际优势,能够可靠地记录母婴行为。这种方法还可以记录更高频率的社会上不太可取的母亲行为。目前尚不清楚这种差异是由于不需要研究人员在场还是记录时间增加所致。这一发现对于旨在捕捉更具生态效度行为并减少需求特征的研究问题可能具有重要意义。