• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不当诱导:CAPRISA 008 案例研究。

Undue inducement: a case study in CAPRISA 008.

机构信息

Centre for the AIDS Programme of Research in South Africa (CAPRISA), University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.

School of Laboratory Medicine and Medical Sciences University of Kwazulu-Natal, Durban, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.

出版信息

J Med Ethics. 2017 Dec;43(12):824-828. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2016-103414. Epub 2017 Mar 27.

DOI:10.1136/medethics-2016-103414
PMID:28348164
Abstract

: Participant safety and data integrity, critical in trials of new investigational drugs, are achieved through honest participant report and precision in the conduct of procedures. HIV prevention post-trial access studies in middle-income countries potentially offer participants many benefits including access to proven efficacious but unlicensed technologies, ancillary care that often exceeds local standards-of-care, financial reimbursement for participation and possibly unintended benefits if participants choose to share or sell investigational drugs. This case study examines the possibility that this combination of benefits may constitute an undue inducement for some participants in middle-income countries, where economic challenges are prevalent. A case study is presented of a single participant in a cohort of 382 participants who used concealment, fabrication and deception to ensure eligibility for a post-trial access study of an unlicensed HIV prevention technology at potential risk to her health and that of her fetus. A root cause analysis revealed her desire to access HIV prevention during an unplanned pregnancy with a partner whose faithfulness was in question. Researchers should consider implementation of systems to efficiently identify similar cases without inconveniencing the majority of participants TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01691768.

摘要

参与者安全和数据完整性,在新的研究性药物试验中至关重要,通过诚实的参与者报告和程序执行的精确性来实现。在中等收入国家进行的 HIV 预防试验后准入研究可能为参与者带来许多益处,包括获得已证明有效的但未获得许可的技术、通常超过当地护理标准的辅助护理、参与的经济补偿,以及如果参与者选择分享或出售研究性药物,可能会获得意外的益处。本案例研究探讨了在经济挑战普遍存在的中等收入国家,这种综合益处可能对某些参与者构成不正当诱导的可能性。本案例研究介绍了 382 名参与者中的一名参与者,她使用隐瞒、伪造和欺骗手段,确保有资格参加一项未获得许可的 HIV 预防技术的试验后准入研究,这可能对她的健康和胎儿健康构成风险。根本原因分析揭示了她在与一个不忠的伴侣意外怀孕时,渴望获得 HIV 预防的愿望。研究人员应考虑实施系统,以便在不影响大多数参与者的情况下,有效地识别类似情况。试验注册号:NCT01691768。

相似文献

1
Undue inducement: a case study in CAPRISA 008.不当诱导:CAPRISA 008 案例研究。
J Med Ethics. 2017 Dec;43(12):824-828. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2016-103414. Epub 2017 Mar 27.
2
Undue inducement, or unfair exclusion: considering a case study of pregnancy in an HIV prevention trial.不当诱因,或不公平排除:以 HIV 预防试验中的妊娠为例进行考虑。
J Med Ethics. 2017 Dec;43(12):829-830. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2017-104370. Epub 2017 Jul 24.
3
Our flawed approach to undue inducement in medical research.我们在医学研究中不当诱导的有缺陷方法。
Bioethics. 2019 Jan;33(1):13-18. doi: 10.1111/bioe.12468. Epub 2018 Jul 16.
4
Microbicide research in developing countries: have we given the ethical concerns due consideration?发展中国家的杀微生物剂研究:我们是否对伦理问题给予了充分考虑?
BMC Med Ethics. 2007 Sep 19;8:10. doi: 10.1186/1472-6939-8-10.
5
Payment expectations for research participation among subjects who tell the truth, subjects who conceal information, and subjects who fabricate information.说实话的受试者、隐瞒信息的受试者以及编造信息的受试者对参与研究的报酬期望。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2015 Mar;41:55-61. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2014.12.004. Epub 2014 Dec 18.
6
Ethics of ancillary care in clinical trials in low income countries: a Nigerian case study.低收入国家临床试验中的辅助护理伦理:尼日利亚案例研究
Afr J Reprod Health. 2014 Sep;18(3 Spec No):135-42.
7
Benefits to research subjects in international trials: do they reduce exploitation or increase undue inducement?国际试验中研究对象的获益:它们是减少了剥削还是增加了不当诱导?
Dev World Bioeth. 2008 Dec;8(3):178-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-8847.2006.00175.x.
8
"Undue inducement' as coercive offers.“不当引诱”作为强制性提议。
Am J Bioeth. 2005 Sep-Oct;5(5):24-5. doi: 10.1080/15265160500245048.
9
Challenges with participant reimbursement: experiences from a post-trial access study.参与者报销方面的挑战:一项试验后获取研究的经验
J Med Ethics. 2015 Nov;41(11):909-13. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2013-101899. Epub 2015 Sep 21.
10
Power Difference and Risk Perception: Mapping Vulnerability within the Decision Process of Pregnant Women towards Clinical Trial Participation in an Urban Middle-Income Setting.权力差异与风险认知:描绘城市中等收入环境中孕妇参与临床试验决策过程中的脆弱性
Dev World Bioeth. 2018 Jun;18(2):68-75. doi: 10.1111/dewb.12132. Epub 2016 Oct 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Women's motivations for participating in the dapivirine vaginal ring open label extension study.女性参与达匹韦林阴道环开放标签扩展研究的动机。
AIDS Care. 2024 Mar;36(3):326-342. doi: 10.1080/09540121.2023.2260145. Epub 2023 Sep 21.
2
Ethical considerations around volunteer payments in a malaria human infection study in Kenya: an embedded empirical ethics study.肯尼亚疟疾人体感染研究中志愿者报酬的伦理考虑:一项嵌入式经验伦理研究。
BMC Med Ethics. 2022 Apr 20;23(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s12910-022-00783-y.
3
"If it benefits someone, it will be good:" perspectives on research participation from pregnant women living with HIV.
如果对某人有益,那就是好事:感染 HIV 的孕妇对参与研究的看法。
AIDS Care. 2023 Mar;35(3):366-373. doi: 10.1080/09540121.2022.2057411. Epub 2022 Mar 27.
4
Ethical issues in establishing the efficacy and safety of long-acting injectable pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV prevention: the HPTN 083 trial.长效注射型 HIV 暴露前预防药物有效性和安全性的确立中的伦理问题:HPTN 083 试验。
Lancet HIV. 2021 Nov;8(11):e723-e728. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3018(21)00153-3. Epub 2021 Aug 26.
5
Ethical considerations for research involving pregnant women living with HIV and their young children: a systematic review of the empiric literature and discussion.涉及感染艾滋病毒的孕妇及其幼儿的研究的伦理考虑:对经验文献的系统回顾和讨论。
BMC Med Ethics. 2021 Apr 1;22(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s12910-021-00601-x.
6
Views among Malawian women about joining HIV prevention clinical trials when pregnant.马拉维女性对于孕期参与艾滋病预防临床试验的看法。
AIDS Res Ther. 2020 May 27;17(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s12981-020-00271-6.
7
When could human challenge trials be deployed to combat emerging infectious diseases? Lessons from the case of a Zika virus human challenge trial.人类挑战试验何时可用于应对新发传染病?寨卡病毒人体挑战试验案例带来的启示。
Trials. 2019 Dec 19;20(Suppl 2):702. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3843-0.
8
Women's views about contraception requirements for biomedical research participation.女性对参与生物医学研究的避孕要求的看法。
PLoS One. 2019 May 8;14(5):e0216332. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0216332. eCollection 2019.