Indiana University-Purdue University - Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Department of Pediatrics, The Ryan White Center for Pediatric Infectious Disease and Global Health, Indiana University School of Medicine, 705 Riley Hospital Drive, Room 5853, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA.
BMC Med Ethics. 2021 Apr 1;22(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s12910-021-00601-x.
The proper and ethical inclusion of PWLHIV and their young children in research is paramount to ensure valid evidence is generated to optimize treatment and care. Little empirical data exists to inform ethical considerations deemed most critical to these populations. Our study aimed to systematically review the empiric literature regarding ethical considerations for research participation of PWLHIV and their young children.
We conducted this systematic review in partnership with a medical librarian. A search strategy was designed and performed within the following electronic databases: Ovid MEDLINE, Embase and CINAHL. We screened titles and abstracts using the following inclusion criteria: (1) a study population of PWLHIV or children under 5 years of age; and (2) collection of qualitative or quantitative data regarding ethics of research participation. Excluded were reviews, commentaries, policy statements, clinical care-related ethics concerns, abstracts, case studies, or studies unrelated to HIV research. Studies were appraised for quality, data were extracted, and studies were qualitatively analyzed using a principle-based ethical framework within the Belmont Report.
Of the 7470 titles identified, 538 full-text articles were reviewed for eligibility and only three articles met full criteria for inclusion within this review. While we allowed for inclusion of studies involving young children born to mothers with HIV, only articles focused on PWLHIV were identified. Within the results of these studies, four themes emerged: (1) adequacy of informed consent; (2) consideration of paternal involvement; (3) balancing risks; and (4) access to research and treatment. A strength of this review is that it included perspectives of international research investigators, community leaders, and male partners. However, only two studies collected empiric data from PWLHIV regarding their experiences participating in research CONCLUSION: Researchers and funding agencies should be aware of these considerations and appreciate the value of and critical need for formative research to ensure clinical trials involving PWLHIV promote ethical, well-informed research participation and, ultimately, improve care outcomes. More research is needed to create a comprehensive ethical framework for researchers when conducting studies with PWLHIV.
将感染艾滋病毒的父母及其年幼子女适当且合乎伦理地纳入研究,对于确保生成有效的证据以优化治疗和护理至关重要。几乎没有实证数据可以为这些人群的研究参与提供最关键的伦理考虑因素。我们的研究旨在系统地审查有关感染艾滋病毒的父母及其年幼子女参与研究的伦理考虑的实证文献。
我们与一名医学图书馆员合作进行了这项系统审查。设计并在以下电子数据库中执行了搜索策略:Ovid MEDLINE、Embase 和 CINAHL。我们使用以下纳入标准筛选标题和摘要:(1) 研究人群为感染艾滋病毒的父母或 5 岁以下儿童;以及 (2) 收集有关研究参与伦理的定性或定量数据。排除的有综述、评论、政策声明、临床护理相关伦理问题、摘要、案例研究或与艾滋病毒研究无关的研究。对研究进行了质量评估,提取了数据,并使用《贝尔蒙报告》中的基于原则的伦理框架对研究进行了定性分析。
在确定的 7470 个标题中,有 538 篇全文文章进行了资格审查,只有 3 篇文章完全符合纳入本综述的标准。虽然我们允许纳入涉及艾滋病毒母亲所生的年幼子女的研究,但只确定了针对感染艾滋病毒父母的文章。在这些研究的结果中,出现了四个主题:(1) 知情同意的充分性;(2) 考虑父亲的参与;(3) 平衡风险;以及 (4) 获得研究和治疗。本综述的一个优势是它纳入了国际研究人员、社区领导和男性伴侣的观点。然而,只有两项研究从感染艾滋病毒的父母那里收集了关于他们参与研究的经验的实证数据。
研究人员和资助机构应意识到这些考虑因素,并认识到形成性研究的价值和迫切需要,以确保涉及感染艾滋病毒的父母的临床试验促进符合伦理、知情的研究参与,并最终改善护理结果。需要开展更多研究,为研究人员在与感染艾滋病毒的父母一起开展研究时制定全面的伦理框架。