• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

超级聪明的领导者会不会因为过于优秀而受到困扰?智力对领导行为感知的曲线效应。

Can super smart leaders suffer from too much of a good thing? The curvilinear effect of intelligence on perceived leadership behavior.

机构信息

Faculty of Business and Economics, University of Lausanne.

The Wharton School of Management, University of Pennsylvania.

出版信息

J Appl Psychol. 2017 Jul;102(7):1003-1021. doi: 10.1037/apl0000221. Epub 2017 Mar 30.

DOI:10.1037/apl0000221
PMID:28358529
Abstract

Although researchers predominately test for linear relationships between variables, at times there may be theoretical and even empirical reasons for expecting nonlinear functions. We examined if the relation between intelligence (IQ) and perceived leadership might be more accurately described by a curvilinear single-peaked function. Following Simonton's (1985) theory, we tested a specific model, indicating that the optimal IQ for perceived leadership will appear at about 1.2 standard deviations above the mean IQ of the group membership. The sample consisted of midlevel leaders from multinational private-sector companies. We used the leaders' scores on the Wonderlic Personnel Test (WPT)-a measure of IQ-to predict how they would be perceived on prototypically effective leadership (i.e., transformational and instrumental leadership). Accounting for the effects of leader personality, gender, age, as well as company, country, and time fixed effects, analyses indicated that perceptions of leadership followed a curvilinear inverted-U function of intelligence. The peak of this function was at an IQ score of about 120, which did not depart significantly from the value predicted by the theory. As the first direct empirical test of a precise curvilinear model of the intelligence-leadership relation, the results have important implications for future research on how leaders are perceived in the workplace. (PsycINFO Database Record

摘要

虽然研究人员主要测试变量之间的线性关系,但有时出于理论甚至实证的原因,可能需要预期非线性函数。我们研究了智力(IQ)和感知领导力之间的关系是否可以通过曲线单峰函数更准确地描述。根据西蒙顿(Simonton)的(1985)理论,我们测试了一个特定的模型,表明感知领导力的最佳 IQ 出现在群体平均 IQ 之上约 1.2 个标准差处。样本由来自跨国私营部门公司的中层领导者组成。我们使用领导者在 Wonderlic 人事测试(WPT)中的得分——衡量 IQ 的指标——来预测他们在典型有效领导力(即变革型和工具型领导力)方面的表现。考虑到领导者人格、性别、年龄以及公司、国家和时间固定效应的影响,分析表明领导力的感知遵循智力的曲线倒 U 形函数。该函数的峰值出现在智商约 120 分的位置,与理论预测的值没有显著差异。作为对智力与领导力关系的精确曲线模型的首次直接实证检验,这些结果对未来研究工作场所中如何感知领导力具有重要意义。

相似文献

1
Can super smart leaders suffer from too much of a good thing? The curvilinear effect of intelligence on perceived leadership behavior.超级聪明的领导者会不会因为过于优秀而受到困扰?智力对领导行为感知的曲线效应。
J Appl Psychol. 2017 Jul;102(7):1003-1021. doi: 10.1037/apl0000221. Epub 2017 Mar 30.
2
The double-edged sword of leader charisma: Understanding the curvilinear relationship between charismatic personality and leader effectiveness.领导者魅力的双刃剑:理解魅力人格与领导效力之间的曲线关系。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2018 Jan;114(1):110-130. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000147. Epub 2017 May 29.
3
What breaks a leader: the curvilinear relation between assertiveness and leadership.是什么造就了领导者:坚定自信与领导力之间的曲线关系。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2007 Feb;92(2):307-24. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.92.2.307.
4
Meta-analytic and primary investigations of the role of followers in ratings of leadership behavior in organizations.元分析和初步研究组织中领导行为评价中追随者的作用。
J Appl Psychol. 2019 Jan;104(1):70-106. doi: 10.1037/apl0000345. Epub 2018 Sep 27.
5
Leader identity as an antecedent of the frequency and consistency of transformational, consideration, and abusive leadership behaviors.领导身份是变革型、关怀型和滥用型领导行为的频率和一致性的前因。
J Appl Psychol. 2012 Nov;97(6):1262-72. doi: 10.1037/a0029043. Epub 2012 Jun 25.
6
Narcissistic leaders: An asset or a liability? Leader visibility, follower responses, and group-level absenteeism.自恋型领导者:资产还是负债?领导者可见度、追随者反应和群体缺勤率。
J Appl Psychol. 2018 Jul;103(7):703-723. doi: 10.1037/apl0000298. Epub 2018 Mar 19.
7
Linking job-relevant personality traits, transformational leadership, and job performance via perceived meaningfulness at work: A moderated mediation model.通过工作中的意义感将与工作相关的人格特质、变革型领导和工作绩效联系起来:一个有调节的中介模型。
J Appl Psychol. 2018 Mar;103(3):324-333. doi: 10.1037/apl0000274. Epub 2017 Oct 9.
8
Interactive effect of leaders' influence tactics and ethical leadership on work effort and helping behavior.领导者影响策略和道德领导力对工作努力和帮助行为的交互影响。
J Soc Psychol. 2013 Sep-Oct;153(5):577-97. doi: 10.1080/00224545.2013.798248.
9
Leader esteem for the least preferred co-worker score, training, and effectiveness: an experimental examination.领导者对最不喜欢的同事的评价得分、培训与效能:一项实验性考察。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1975 Mar;31(3):401-9. doi: 10.1037/h0076473.
10
Energizing leaders via self-reflection: A within-person field experiment.通过自我反思激发领导者:一项个体内现场实验。
J Appl Psychol. 2019 Jan;104(1):1-18. doi: 10.1037/apl0000350. Epub 2018 Oct 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Coach abusive supervision and athlete engagement: a moderated mediation model.教练的辱骂式监督与运动员的参与度:一个有调节的中介模型。
Front Psychol. 2025 Apr 17;16:1494077. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1494077. eCollection 2025.
2
Predicting Leadership Status Through Trait Emotional Intelligence and Cognitive Ability.通过特质情绪智力和认知能力预测领导地位
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Mar 11;15(3):345. doi: 10.3390/bs15030345.
3
Character-enabled improvisation and the new normal: A paradox perspective.基于角色的即兴创作与新常态:一种悖论视角。
Manag Learn. 2023 Feb;54(1):77-98. doi: 10.1177/13505076221118840.
4
The Six Challenges for Personality, Intelligence, Cognitive Skills, and Life Outcomes Research: An Introduction to the Special Issue.人格、智力、认知技能与生活成果研究面临的六大挑战:特刊引言
J Intell. 2024 Mar 18;12(3):35. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence12030035.
5
General intelligence, personality traits, and motivation as predictors of performance, potential, and rate of advancement of Royal Navy senior officers.一般智力、人格特质和动机作为皇家海军高级军官绩效、潜力和晋升速度的预测指标。
Mil Psychol. 2024 Nov;36(6):617-630. doi: 10.1080/08995605.2023.2244818. Epub 2023 Aug 11.
6
Initial Evidence for the Hypersensitivity Hypothesis: Emotional Intelligence as a Magnifier of Emotional Experience.超敏反应假说的初步证据:情商作为情绪体验的放大器
J Intell. 2021 May 4;9(2):24. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence9020024.
7
Cognitive and noncognitive predictors of success.认知和非认知因素对成功的预测。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Nov 19;116(47):23499-23504. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1910510116. Epub 2019 Nov 4.
8
How Specific Abilities Might Throw '' a Curve: An Idea on How to Capitalize on the Predictive Validity of Specific Cognitive Abilities.特定能力如何可能带来“意外情况”:关于如何利用特定认知能力的预测效度的一种观点。
J Intell. 2018 Sep 7;6(3):41. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence6030041.
9
Intellectual Brilliance and Presidential Performance: Why Pure Intelligence (or Openness) Doesn't Suffice.智力卓越与总统表现:为何单纯的智力(或开放性)并不足够。
J Intell. 2018 Mar 23;6(2):18. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence6020018.