• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过特质情绪智力和认知能力预测领导地位

Predicting Leadership Status Through Trait Emotional Intelligence and Cognitive Ability.

作者信息

Zadorozhny Bogdan S, Petrides K V, Cheng Yongtian, Cuppello Stephen, van der Linden Dimitri

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University College London (UCL), London WC1E 6BT, UK.

Thomas International, Marlow SL7 2NL, UK.

出版信息

Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Mar 11;15(3):345. doi: 10.3390/bs15030345.

DOI:10.3390/bs15030345
PMID:40150239
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11939709/
Abstract

Many interconnected factors have been implicated in the prediction of whether a given individual occupies a managerial role. These include an assortment of demographic variables such as age and gender as well as trait emotional intelligence (trait EI) and cognitive ability. In order to disentangle their respective effects on formal leadership position, the present study compares a traditional linear approach in the form of a logistic regression with the results of a set of supervised machine learning (SML) algorithms. In addition to merely extending beyond linear effects, a series of techniques were incorporated so as to practically apply ML approaches and interpret their results, including feature importance and interactions. The results demonstrated the superior predictive strength of trait EI over cognitive ability, especially of its sociability factor, and supported the predictive utility of the random forest (RF) algorithm in this context. We thereby hope to contribute and support a developing trend of acknowledging the genuine complexity of real-world contexts such as leadership and provide direction for future investigations, including more sophisticated ML approaches.

摘要

许多相互关联的因素与预测某个人是否担任管理角色有关。这些因素包括各种人口统计学变量,如年龄和性别,以及特质情商(特质EI)和认知能力。为了厘清它们对正式领导职位的各自影响,本研究将逻辑回归形式的传统线性方法与一组监督机器学习(SML)算法的结果进行了比较。除了仅仅超越线性效应之外,还纳入了一系列技术,以便实际应用机器学习方法并解释其结果,包括特征重要性和相互作用。结果表明,特质EI比认知能力具有更强的预测力,尤其是其社交能力因素,并支持随机森林(RF)算法在此背景下的预测效用。因此,我们希望做出贡献并支持一种发展趋势,即承认领导力等现实世界背景的真正复杂性,并为未来的研究提供方向,包括更复杂的机器学习方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4bba/11939709/67e1438d165b/behavsci-15-00345-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4bba/11939709/8e5c72487b47/behavsci-15-00345-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4bba/11939709/9993d62be292/behavsci-15-00345-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4bba/11939709/b1c3712a1c41/behavsci-15-00345-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4bba/11939709/4b951e9e1314/behavsci-15-00345-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4bba/11939709/dbbc8550c106/behavsci-15-00345-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4bba/11939709/3bdc311f91ac/behavsci-15-00345-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4bba/11939709/9f1270fdeb22/behavsci-15-00345-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4bba/11939709/67e1438d165b/behavsci-15-00345-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4bba/11939709/8e5c72487b47/behavsci-15-00345-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4bba/11939709/9993d62be292/behavsci-15-00345-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4bba/11939709/b1c3712a1c41/behavsci-15-00345-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4bba/11939709/4b951e9e1314/behavsci-15-00345-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4bba/11939709/dbbc8550c106/behavsci-15-00345-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4bba/11939709/3bdc311f91ac/behavsci-15-00345-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4bba/11939709/9f1270fdeb22/behavsci-15-00345-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4bba/11939709/67e1438d165b/behavsci-15-00345-g008.jpg

相似文献

1
Predicting Leadership Status Through Trait Emotional Intelligence and Cognitive Ability.通过特质情绪智力和认知能力预测领导地位
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Mar 11;15(3):345. doi: 10.3390/bs15030345.
2
Examining the Relationship between Emotional Intelligence, Leadership Attributes and Workplace Experience of Australian Chief Radiographers.考察澳大利亚首席放射技师的情绪智力、领导特质和工作场所经验之间的关系。
J Med Imaging Radiat Sci. 2020 Jun;51(2):256-263. doi: 10.1016/j.jmir.2020.01.002. Epub 2020 Feb 17.
3
Sleep quality and duration are associated with greater trait emotional intelligence.睡眠质量和时长与更高的特质情绪智力有关。
Sleep Health. 2022 Apr;8(2):230-233. doi: 10.1016/j.sleh.2021.06.003. Epub 2021 Nov 12.
4
Emotional intelligence among medical students in Sweden - a questionnaire study.瑞典医学生的情绪智力 - 一项问卷调查研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2023 Aug 24;23(1):603. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04570-0.
5
The Relationship Between Trait Emotional Intelligence, Cognition, and Emotional Awareness: An Interpretative Model.特质情商、认知与情绪意识之间的关系:一种解释模型。
Front Psychol. 2019 Jul 30;10:1711. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01711. eCollection 2019.
6
Emotional Intelligence Throughout the Lifecycle of Australian Radiographers.澳大利亚放射技师职业生涯全程中的情商
Radiol Technol. 2017 Sep;89(1):12-19.
7
Exploring the relationships between trait emotional intelligence and objective socio-emotional outcomes in childhood.探索儿童期特质情绪智力与客观社会情感结果之间的关系。
Br J Educ Psychol. 2009 Jun;79(Pt 2):259-72. doi: 10.1348/000709908X368848. Epub 2008 Oct 23.
8
Is emotional intelligence linked with academic achievement? The first TEIQue-SF study in a sample of Saudi medical rehabilitation students.情商与学业成绩有关联吗?沙特医学康复专业学生样本中的第一项特质情绪智力问卷简版(TEIQue-SF)研究。
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2022 May 12;78:103726. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2022.103726. eCollection 2022 Jun.
9
Trait emotional intelligence in American pilots.美国飞行员的特质情绪智力。
Sci Rep. 2022 Sep 2;12(1):15033. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-18868-4.
10
[Constructing a predictive model for the death risk of patients with septic shock based on supervised machine learning algorithms].基于监督机器学习算法构建脓毒症休克患者死亡风险预测模型
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2024 Apr;36(4):345-352. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20230930-00832.

本文引用的文献

1
Emotional Intelligence among Nursing Students: Findings from a Longitudinal Study.护生的情商:一项纵向研究的结果
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Oct 14;10(10):2032. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10102032.
2
A Meta-Analysis of the Relationships Between Emotional Intelligence and Employee Outcomes.情商与员工工作成果关系的元分析
Front Psychol. 2022 Apr 25;13:611348. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.611348. eCollection 2022.
3
Leadership emergence: An integrative review.领导才能的涌现:综合述评。
J Appl Psychol. 2022 Nov;107(11):2069-2100. doi: 10.1037/apl0000997. Epub 2021 Dec 30.
4
Gradient boosted trees with individual explanations: An alternative to logistic regression for viability prediction in the first trimester of pregnancy.梯度提升树与个体解释:一种替代逻辑回归的方法,用于预测妊娠早期的存活能力。
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2022 Jan;213:106520. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2021.106520. Epub 2021 Nov 10.
5
College students in the western world are becoming less emotionally intelligent: A cross-temporal meta-analysis of trait emotional intelligence.西方世界的大学生情绪智力正变得越来越低:一项关于特质情绪智力的跨时元分析。
J Pers. 2021 Dec;89(6):1176-1190. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12643. Epub 2021 Apr 29.
6
Supervised Machine Learning: A Brief Primer.监督机器学习:简介。
Behav Ther. 2020 Sep;51(5):675-687. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2020.05.002. Epub 2020 May 16.
7
Why Cohen's Kappa should be avoided as performance measure in classification.为什么科恩氏 Kappa 不应该被用作分类的性能度量?
PLoS One. 2019 Sep 26;14(9):e0222916. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0222916. eCollection 2019.
8
What is Machine Learning? A Primer for the Epidemiologist.什么是机器学习?流行病学人员入门指南。
Am J Epidemiol. 2019 Dec 31;188(12):2222-2239. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwz189.
9
Cross-Validation Approaches for Replicability in Psychology.心理学中可重复性的交叉验证方法。
Front Psychol. 2018 Jul 2;9:1117. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01117. eCollection 2018.
10
Machine Learning Approaches for Clinical Psychology and Psychiatry.机器学习在临床心理学和精神病学中的应用。
Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2018 May 7;14:91-118. doi: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032816-045037. Epub 2018 Jan 29.