• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一般智力、人格特质和动机作为皇家海军高级军官绩效、潜力和晋升速度的预测指标。

General intelligence, personality traits, and motivation as predictors of performance, potential, and rate of advancement of Royal Navy senior officers.

作者信息

Young Mike, Dulewicz Victor

机构信息

Pembroke College, University of Oxford and Royal Navy.

Henley Business School, Greenlands, UK.

出版信息

Mil Psychol. 2024 Nov;36(6):617-630. doi: 10.1080/08995605.2023.2244818. Epub 2023 Aug 11.

DOI:10.1080/08995605.2023.2244818
PMID:37566465
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11622648/
Abstract

This paper assesses the impact of general intelligence, as well as specific personality traits, and aspects of motivation, on performance, potential, and advancement of senior leaders. A questionnaire survey was conducted on the full population of 381 senior officers in the Royal Navy with an 80% response rate. Performance, potential, and rate of advancement were established direct from the organization's appraisal system; intelligence, personality traits and motivation were assessed, at the time of the study, using the Verify G+ Test, Occupational Personality Questionnaire, and Motivation Questionnaire. Findings suggest differences in motivation are more important than differences in general intelligence, or personality traits, in predicting assessed performance, potential within, and actual rate of advancement to, senior leadership positions. This is a rare example of a study into very senior leaders, validated against both formal appraisal data and actual rates of advancement. As a consequence of this study the Royal Navy has started to use psychometric-based assessments as part of the selection and development of its most Senior Officers.

摘要

本文评估了一般智力、特定人格特质以及动机因素对高级领导者的绩效、潜力和晋升的影响。对皇家海军381名高级军官进行了问卷调查,回复率为80%。绩效、潜力和晋升率直接来自组织的评估系统;在研究时,使用Verify G+测试、职业人格问卷和动机问卷对智力、人格特质和动机进行了评估。研究结果表明,在预测高级领导职位的评估绩效、内部潜力和实际晋升率方面,动机差异比一般智力或人格特质差异更为重要。这是一项针对非常高级领导者的研究的罕见案例,该研究通过正式评估数据和实际晋升率进行了验证。由于这项研究,皇家海军已开始将基于心理测评的评估作为其最高级军官选拔和发展的一部分。

相似文献

1
General intelligence, personality traits, and motivation as predictors of performance, potential, and rate of advancement of Royal Navy senior officers.一般智力、人格特质和动机作为皇家海军高级军官绩效、潜力和晋升速度的预测指标。
Mil Psychol. 2024 Nov;36(6):617-630. doi: 10.1080/08995605.2023.2244818. Epub 2023 Aug 11.
2
A model of command, leadership and management competency as a predictor of the performance, potential and rate of advancement of Royal Navy senior officers.
Mil Psychol. 2025 Apr 21:1-17. doi: 10.1080/08995605.2025.2493392.
3
Safety intelligence: an exploration of senior managers' characteristics.安全情报:对高级管理人员特征的探索。
Appl Ergon. 2014 Jul;45(4):967-75. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2013.11.012. Epub 2013 Dec 18.
4
Selection of Air Force officers--profiles, criteria, testing.
Acta Neurochir Suppl. 1997;69:22-6. doi: 10.1007/978-3-7091-6860-8_6.
5
Character Strengths of Junior Australian Army Officers.澳大利亚初级陆军军官的性格优势。
Mil Med. 2019 May 1;184(5-6):e147-e153. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usy251.
6
Leadership experiences and practices of South African health managers: what is the influence of gender? -a qualitative, exploratory study.南非卫生管理人员的领导经验和实践:性别有何影响?——一项定性、探索性研究。
Int J Equity Health. 2018 Sep 18;17(1):148. doi: 10.1186/s12939-018-0859-0.
7
Personality characteristics of successful Navy submarine personnel.
Mil Med. 1996 Apr;161(4):239-42.
8
Swiss residents' speciality choices--impact of gender, personality traits, career motivation and life goals.瑞士居民的专业选择——性别、性格特征、职业动机和生活目标的影响。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2006 Oct 23;6:137. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-6-137.
9
Sleep and Military Leaders: Examining the Values, Beliefs, and Quality of Sleep and the Impact on Occupational Performance.睡眠与军事领袖:审视睡眠的价值观、信念、质量及其对职业表现的影响。
Mil Med. 2024 May 18;189(5-6):1023-1031. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usad040.
10
Transformational leadership: relations to the five-factor model and team performance in typical and maximum contexts.变革型领导:与五因素模型及典型情境和极限情境下团队绩效的关系
J Appl Psychol. 2004 Aug;89(4):610-21. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.89.4.610.

本文引用的文献

1
Early predictors of successful military careers among West Point cadets.西点军校学员成功军事生涯的早期预测因素。
Mil Psychol. 2020 Nov 16;32(6):389-407. doi: 10.1080/08995605.2020.1801285. eCollection 2020.
2
Does forcing reduce faking? A meta-analytic review of forced-choice personality measures in high-stakes situations.强迫是否会减少伪装?高风险情境下迫选人格测验的元分析综述。
J Appl Psychol. 2019 Nov;104(11):1347-1368. doi: 10.1037/apl0000414. Epub 2019 May 9.
3
From needs to goals and representations: Foundations for a unified theory of motivation, personality, and development.从需要到目标再到表现:动机、个性和发展的统一理论基础。
Psychol Rev. 2017 Nov;124(6):689-719. doi: 10.1037/rev0000082. Epub 2017 Sep 21.
4
Can super smart leaders suffer from too much of a good thing? The curvilinear effect of intelligence on perceived leadership behavior.超级聪明的领导者会不会因为过于优秀而受到困扰?智力对领导行为感知的曲线效应。
J Appl Psychol. 2017 Jul;102(7):1003-1021. doi: 10.1037/apl0000221. Epub 2017 Mar 30.
5
Individual differences and their measurement: A review of 100 years of research.个体差异及其测量:100 年研究综述。
J Appl Psychol. 2017 Mar;102(3):254-273. doi: 10.1037/apl0000151. Epub 2017 Feb 2.
6
Motivation related to work: A century of progress.工作动机:一个世纪的进步。
J Appl Psychol. 2017 Mar;102(3):338-355. doi: 10.1037/apl0000133. Epub 2017 Feb 2.
7
Leadership in applied psychology: Three waves of theory and research.应用心理学中的领导力:理论与研究的三个浪潮。
J Appl Psychol. 2017 Mar;102(3):434-451. doi: 10.1037/apl0000089. Epub 2017 Jan 26.
8
When to use the Bonferroni correction.何时使用邦费罗尼校正。
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2014 Sep;34(5):502-8. doi: 10.1111/opo.12131. Epub 2014 Apr 2.
9
Hierarchical representations of the five-factor model of personality in predicting job performance: integrating three organizing frameworks with two theoretical perspectives.人格五因素模型在预测工作绩效方面的层次表示:用三个组织框架和两种理论观点整合。
J Appl Psychol. 2013 Nov;98(6):875-925. doi: 10.1037/a0033901. Epub 2013 Sep 9.
10
The Great Eight competencies: a criterion-centric approach to validation.八大核心能力:一种以标准为中心的验证方法。
J Appl Psychol. 2005 Nov;90(6):1185-203. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.90.6.1185.