• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

藏毛性Limberg皮瓣手术中远端瘢痕至中线的距离是促进复发的因素:一项多中心病例对照研究。

Distal scar-to-midline distance in pilonidal Limberg flap surgery is a recurrence-promoting factor: A multicenter, case-control study.

作者信息

Kaplan Mehmet, Ozcan Onder, Bilgic Ethem, Kaplan Elif Tugce, Kaplan Tugba, Kaplan Fatma Cigdem

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, Bahcesehir University (BAU) School of Medicine, İstanbul, Turkey.

Department of General Surgery, Sitki Kocman University School of Medicine, Mugla, Turkey.

出版信息

Am J Surg. 2017 Nov;214(5):811-819. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2017.02.008. Epub 2017 Mar 9.

DOI:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2017.02.008
PMID:28359560
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Limberg flap (LF) procedure is widely performed for the treatment of sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus (SPS); however, recurrences continues to be observed. The aim of this study was to assess the relationship between LF designs and the risk of SPS recurrence.

METHODS

Sixty-one cases with recurrent disease (study group) and 194 controls, with a minimum of 5 recurrence-free years following surgery (control group), were included in the study. LF reconstructions performed in each group were classified as off-midline closure (OMC) and non-OMC types. Subsequently, the 2 groups were analyzed.

RESULTS

After adjustment for all variables, non-OMC types showed the most prominent correlation with recurrence, followed by interrupted suturing type, family history of SPS, smoking, prolonged healing time, and younger age. The best cut-off value for the critical distance from the midline was found to be 11 mm (with 72% sensitivity and 95% specificity for recurrence).

CONCLUSIONS

We recommend OMC modifications, with the flap tailored to create a safe margin of at least 2 cm between the flap borders and the midline.

摘要

背景

Limberg皮瓣(LF)手术广泛用于治疗骶尾部藏毛窦(SPS);然而,复发情况仍时有发生。本研究旨在评估LF设计与SPS复发风险之间的关系。

方法

本研究纳入了61例复发病例(研究组)和194例对照,对照组术后至少有5年无复发(对照组)。每组进行的LF重建分为中线外闭合(OMC)和非OMC类型。随后,对两组进行分析。

结果

在对所有变量进行调整后,非OMC类型与复发的相关性最为显著,其次是间断缝合类型、SPS家族史、吸烟、愈合时间延长和年龄较小。从中线起的临界距离的最佳截断值为11毫米(对复发的敏感性为72%,特异性为95%)。

结论

我们建议对OMC进行改良,根据皮瓣进行调整,使皮瓣边界与中线之间形成至少2厘米的安全边缘。

相似文献

1
Distal scar-to-midline distance in pilonidal Limberg flap surgery is a recurrence-promoting factor: A multicenter, case-control study.藏毛性Limberg皮瓣手术中远端瘢痕至中线的距离是促进复发的因素:一项多中心病例对照研究。
Am J Surg. 2017 Nov;214(5):811-819. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2017.02.008. Epub 2017 Mar 9.
2
Modified Limberg flap reconstruction compares favourably with primary repair for pilonidal sinus surgery.改良Limberg皮瓣重建术在藏毛窦手术中与一期修复相比具有优势。
ANZ J Surg. 2004 Apr;74(4):238-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2004.02951.x.
3
Comparison of short-term results between the modified Karydakis flap and the modified Limberg flap in the management of pilonidal sinus disease: a randomized controlled study.改良 Karydakis 皮瓣与改良 Limberg 皮瓣治疗藏毛窦病的短期疗效比较:一项随机对照研究。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2013 Apr;56(4):491-8. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e31828006f7.
4
Modified Limberg transposition flap for sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus.改良Limberg转位皮瓣治疗骶尾部藏毛窦
Surg Today. 2004;34(5):419-23. doi: 10.1007/s00595-003-2725-x.
5
Excision with primary midline closure compared with Limberg flap in the treatment of sacrococcygeal pilonidal disease: a randomised clinical trial.与Limberg皮瓣术相比,一期中线缝合切除术治疗骶尾部藏毛疾病的随机临床试验
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2019 Jan;101(1):21-29. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2018.0144. Epub 2018 Oct 5.
6
Randomized comparison of Limberg flap versus modified primary closure for the treatment of pilonidal disease.Limberg皮瓣与改良一期缝合治疗藏毛窦疾病的随机对照研究
Am J Surg. 2010 Jul;200(1):9-14. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2009.05.036.
7
[Pilonidal sinus--a classical plastic procedure according to Limberg (Limberg flap procedure) or its modified version?].藏毛窦——按照林贝格法(林贝格皮瓣手术)的经典整形手术还是其改良术式?
Rozhl Chir. 2011 Aug;90(8):482-7.
8
Comparison of modified limberg flap and modified elliptical rotation flap for pilonidal sinus surgery: a retrospective cohort study.改良 Limberg 皮瓣与改良椭圆旋转皮瓣治疗藏毛窦的比较:一项回顾性队列研究。
Int J Surg. 2015 Apr;16(Pt A):74-77. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.02.024. Epub 2015 Mar 7.
9
Randomized prospective comparison of midline and off-midline closure techniques in pilonidal sinus surgery.藏毛窦手术中中线与非中线闭合技术的随机前瞻性比较。
Surgery. 2016 Mar;159(3):749-54. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2015.09.024. Epub 2015 Oct 31.
10
A comparison of surgical outcome of fasciocutaneous V-Y advancement flap and Limberg transposition flap for recurrent sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus disease.筋膜皮V-Y推进皮瓣与林贝格转移皮瓣治疗复发性骶尾部藏毛窦疾病的手术效果比较。
Asian J Surg. 2017 May;40(3):197-202. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2015.10.002. Epub 2015 Nov 24.

引用本文的文献

1
[Post-primary Limberg flap-A new approach in pilonidal sinus surgery].[原发性后Limberg皮瓣——藏毛窦手术的一种新方法]
Chirurgie (Heidelb). 2025 Aug;96(8):673-674. doi: 10.1007/s00104-025-02328-6. Epub 2025 Jun 23.
2
Impact of surgical case load on recurrence rates in pilonidal sinus disease: a cross-study data synthesis.手术病例数对藏毛窦疾病复发率的影响:一项跨研究数据综合分析
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2025 May 23;40(1):126. doi: 10.1007/s00384-025-04883-0.
3
A novel, double Limberg flap repair for recurrent pilonidal sinus disease.
一种用于复发性藏毛窦疾病的新型双Limberg皮瓣修复术。
J Surg Case Rep. 2024 Nov 6;2024(11):rjae683. doi: 10.1093/jscr/rjae683. eCollection 2024 Nov.
4
Pit picking vs. Limberg flap vs. primary open method to treat pilonidal sinus disease - A cohort of 327 consecutive patients.用于治疗藏毛窦疾病的挖除术与Limberg皮瓣术及一期开放法——327例连续患者队列研究
Innov Surg Sci. 2022 Jun 27;7(1):23-29. doi: 10.1515/iss-2021-0041. eCollection 2022 Mar 1.
5
The Surgical Management of Pilonidal Disease is Uncertain Because of High Recurrence Rates.由于复发率高,藏毛疾病的手术治疗存在不确定性。
Cureus. 2018 May 14;10(5):e2625. doi: 10.7759/cureus.2625.