Tallarico Marco, Canullo Luigi, Caneva Martina, Özcan Mutlu
Private Practice, Rome, Italy; Aldent University, Implantology and Prosthetic Aspects, Master of Science in Dentistry Program, Tirana, Albania.
Private Practice, Rome, Italy; Istituto Stomatologico Toscano, Camaiore, Viareggio, Italy.
J Prosthodont Res. 2017 Jul;61(3):233-241. doi: 10.1016/j.jpor.2017.03.001. Epub 2017 Mar 27.
The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the microbial colonization at the implant-abutment interfaces (IAI) on bone-level implants and to identify possible association with peri-implant conditions.
The focus question aimed to answer whether two-piece osseointegrated implants, in function for at least 1 year, in human, relate to higher bacterial count and the onset of periimplantitis, compared to healthy peri-implant conditions. Search strategy encompassed the on-line (MedLine, Google scholar, Cochrane library) literature from 1990 up to March 2015 published in English using combinations of MeSH (Medical Subject Headings) and search terms. Quality assessment of selected full-text articles was performed according to the ARRIVE and CONSORT statement guidelines. For data analysis, the total bacterial count of Porphyromonas gingivalis, Tannerella forsythia, Treponema denticola, Prevotella intermedia, and Fusobacterium nucleatum was calculated and compared to IAI with or without peri-implant pathology.
A total of 14 articles, reporting data from 1126 implants, fulfilled the inclusion criteria and subjected to quality assessment. The selected studies revealed contamination of the IAI, in patients who received two-piece implant systems. Meta-analysis indicated significant difference in total bacterial count between implants affected by periimplantitis versus healthy peri-implant tissues (0.387±0.055; 95% CI 0.279-0.496). Less bacterial counts were identified in the healthy IAI for all the investigated gram-negative bacteria except for T. forsythia.
Significantly higher bacterial counts were found for periodontal pathogenic bacteria within the IAI of implants in patients with periimplantitis compared to those implants surrounded by healthy peri-implant tissues.
本系统评价和荟萃分析旨在评估骨水平种植体种植体 - 基台界面(IAI)处的微生物定植情况,并确定其与种植体周围状况的可能关联。
核心问题旨在回答与健康的种植体周围状况相比,在人体中使用至少1年的两件式骨结合种植体是否与更高的细菌计数及种植体周炎的发生有关。检索策略包括使用医学主题词(MeSH)和检索词组合,搜索1990年至2015年3月期间以英文发表在在线数据库(MedLine、谷歌学术、Cochrane图书馆)中的文献。根据ARRIVE和CONSORT声明指南对选定的全文文章进行质量评估。数据分析时,计算牙龈卟啉单胞菌、福赛坦纳菌、具核梭杆菌、中间普雷沃菌和齿垢密螺旋体的总细菌计数,并将其与有或无种植体周围病变的IAI进行比较。
共有14篇报告1126颗种植体数据的文章符合纳入标准并接受质量评估。所选研究显示,接受两件式种植系统的患者中IAI存在污染。荟萃分析表明,种植体周炎患者的种植体与健康种植体周围组织的总细菌计数存在显著差异(0.387±0.055;95%可信区间0.279 - 0.496)。除福赛坦纳菌外,在健康的IAI中,所有研究的革兰氏阴性菌的细菌计数均较少。
与健康种植体周围组织包围的种植体相比,种植体周炎患者种植体的IAI内牙周病原菌的细菌计数显著更高。