Lin Tian, Gifford Wendy, Lan Yutao, Qin Xiuqun, Liu Xuelian, Wang Juan, Yang Biping, You Tianhui, Chen Ken
School of Nursing, Guangdong Pharmaceutical University, 283 Jianghai Avenue, Haizhu Distrct, Guangzhou, China.
School of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Int J Nurs Stud. 2017 Jun;71:80-88. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2017.03.005. Epub 2017 Mar 9.
To review the evidence on diagnostic accuracy of ultrasonography for detecting correct nasogastric tube (NGT) placement in adults compared to X-ray as the reference standard.
This is a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies, searched in the literature between 1961 and 2015. We included studies which compared the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasonography detection for NGT placement with X-ray in adult patients who were undergoing NGT placement for any reason in any care setting. We searched published studies in the following electronic databases: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Web of Science, WanFang Data, China Journal Net, and the Chinese Biomedical Literature Database. Both English and non-English-language articles were retrieved. Risk of bias was assessed using a standard procedure according to the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) criteria.
We included five studies involving a total of 420 adult patients undergoing nasogastric tube placement: three trials were undertaken in mechanically ventilated patients in prehospital settings and two involved participants with comma or severe trauma in emergency room or intensive care unit (ICU). Pooled results showed that ultrasonography had a sensitivity of 0.93 (95% CI 0.87 to 0.97), and specificity of 0.97 (95% CI 0. 23 to 1.00), suggesting that diagnostic performance of ultrasound is useful to confirm correct NGT placement, but not optimal to detect incorrect NGT position. This was confirmed through a summary receiver operator characteristics (SROC) curve that showed the area under the curve was 0.96 (95% CI 0.94 to 0.98).
The main limitation of the review is the relatively moderate level of heterogeneity of included studies which may partially undermine the reliability and reproducibility of results. The insufficient studies included did not allow identification of possible sources of heterogeneity and exploration of reporting bias. Due to heterogeneity of studies, the diagnostic performance of ultrasonography could only be drawn cautiously. Physicians and nurses should perform routine X-ray if visualization of NGT is not possible. More well designed studies exploring ultrasound as a diagnostic tool for accuracy of NGT placement are needed to strengthen the current evidence.
与作为参考标准的X线相比,回顾关于超声检查在检测成人鼻胃管(NGT)正确置入方面诊断准确性的证据。
这是一项对观察性研究的系统评价和荟萃分析,检索了1961年至2015年的文献。我们纳入了在任何护理环境中因任何原因接受NGT置入的成年患者中,比较超声检查检测NGT置入与X线诊断准确性的研究。我们在以下电子数据库中检索已发表的研究:Cochrane对照试验中心注册库、MEDLINE、EMBASE、CINAHL、科学网、万方数据、中国知网和中国生物医学文献数据库。检索了英文和非英文文章。根据诊断准确性研究质量评估(QUADAS-2)标准,采用标准程序评估偏倚风险。
我们纳入了5项研究,共涉及420例接受鼻胃管置入的成年患者:3项试验在院前环境中的机械通气患者中进行,2项涉及急诊室或重症监护病房(ICU)中患有昏迷或严重创伤的参与者。汇总结果显示,超声检查的敏感性为0.93(95%CI 0.87至0.97),特异性为0.97(95%CI 0.23至1.00),表明超声的诊断性能有助于确认NGT的正确置入,但检测NGT位置错误并非最佳。通过汇总受试者工作特征(SROC)曲线证实了这一点,该曲线显示曲线下面积为0.96(95%CI 0.94至0.98)。
该综述的主要局限性在于纳入研究的异质性水平相对中等,这可能部分削弱结果的可靠性和可重复性。纳入的研究不足,无法确定可能的异质性来源和探索报告偏倚。由于研究的异质性,只能谨慎得出超声检查的诊断性能。如果无法看到NGT,医生和护士应进行常规X线检查。需要更多设计良好的研究来探索超声作为诊断NGT置入准确性的工具,以加强现有证据。