Tomczak Adam P, Fernández-Trillo Jorge, Bharill Shashank, Papp Ferenc, Panyi Gyorgy, Stühmer Walter, Isacoff Ehud Y, Pardo Luis A
Oncophysiology Group, Max Planck Institute for Experimental Medicine, 37075 Göttingen, Germany.
Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720.
J Gen Physiol. 2017 May 1;149(5):577-593. doi: 10.1085/jgp.201611742. Epub 2017 Mar 30.
Voltage-gated ion channels couple transmembrane potential changes to ion flow. Conformational changes in the voltage-sensing domain (VSD) of the channel are thought to be transmitted to the pore domain (PD) through an α-helical linker between them (S4-S5 linker). However, our recent work on channels disrupted in the S4-S5 linker has challenged this interpretation for the KCNH family. Furthermore, a recent single-particle cryo-electron microscopy structure of K10.1 revealed that the S4-S5 linker is a short loop in this KCNH family member, confirming the need for an alternative gating model. Here we use "split" channels made by expression of VSD and PD as separate fragments to investigate the mechanism of gating in K10.1. We find that disruption of the covalent connection within the S4 helix compromises the ability of channels to close at negative voltage, whereas disconnecting the S4-S5 linker from S5 slows down activation and deactivation kinetics. Surprisingly, voltage-clamp fluorometry and MTS accessibility assays show that the motion of the S4 voltage sensor is virtually unaffected when VSD and PD are not covalently bound. Finally, experiments using constitutively open PD mutants suggest that the presence of the VSD is structurally important for the conducting conformation of the pore. Collectively, our observations offer partial support to the gating model that assumes that an inward motion of the C-terminal S4 helix, rather than the S4-S5 linker, closes the channel gate, while also suggesting that control of the pore by the voltage sensor involves more than one mechanism.
电压门控离子通道将跨膜电位变化与离子流动相耦合。通道电压感应结构域(VSD)的构象变化被认为是通过它们之间的α-螺旋连接子(S4-S5连接子)传递到孔道结构域(PD)的。然而,我们最近关于S4-S5连接子被破坏的通道的研究对KCNH家族的这一解释提出了挑战。此外,最近K10.1的单颗粒冷冻电子显微镜结构显示,在这个KCNH家族成员中S4-S5连接子是一个短环,这证实了需要一个替代的门控模型。在这里,我们使用通过将VSD和PD作为单独片段表达而制成的“拆分”通道来研究K10.1中的门控机制。我们发现,S4螺旋内共价连接的破坏会损害通道在负电压下关闭的能力,而将S4-S5连接子与S5断开会减慢激活和失活动力学。令人惊讶的是,电压钳荧光测定法和MTS可及性测定法表明,当VSD和PD没有共价结合时,S4电压传感器的运动几乎不受影响。最后,使用组成型开放PD突变体的实验表明,VSD的存在对孔道的传导构象在结构上很重要。总的来说,我们的观察结果为门控模型提供了部分支持,该模型假设C端S4螺旋向内运动而不是S4-S5连接子关闭通道门,同时也表明电压传感器对孔道的控制涉及多种机制。