Lovell Sarah, Walker Robert J, Schollum John B W, Marshall Mark R, McNoe Bronwen M, Derrett Sarah
School of Health Sciences, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Department of Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
BMJ Open. 2017 Mar 29;7(3):e014781. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014781.
Issues related to renal replacement therapy in elderly people with end stage kidney disease (ESKD) are complex. There is inadequate empirical data related to: decision-making by older populations, treatment experiences, implications of dialysis treatment and treatment modality on quality of life, and how these link to expectations of ageing.
Participants for this study were selected from a larger quantitative study of dialysis and predialysis patients aged 65 years or older recruited from three nephrology services across New Zealand. All participants had reached chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage 5 and had undergone dialysis education but had not started dialysis or recently started dialysis within the past 6 months.
Serial qualitative interviews were undertaken to explore the decision-making processes and subsequent treatment experiences of patients with ESKD.Analytical approach: A framework method guided the iterative process of analysis. Decision-making codes were generated within NVivo software and then compared with the body of the interviews.
Interviews were undertaken with 17 participants. We observed that decision-making was often a fluid process, rather than occurring at a single point in time, and was heavily influenced by perceptions of oneself as becoming old, social circumstances, life events and health status.
This study focuses on participants' experiences of decision-making about treatment and does not include perspectives of their nephrologists or other members of the nephrology team.
Older patients often delay dialysis as an act of self-efficacy. They often do not commit to a dialysis decision following predialysis education. Delaying decision-making and initiating dialysis were common. This was not seen by participants as a final decision about therapy. Predialysis care and education should be different for older patients, who will delay decision-making until the time of facing obvious uraemic symptoms, threatening blood tests or paternalistic guidance from their nephrologist.
Australasian Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN 12611000024943; results.
老年终末期肾病(ESKD)患者的肾脏替代治疗相关问题较为复杂。目前缺乏足够的实证数据,涉及老年人群的决策制定、治疗体验、透析治疗及其方式对生活质量的影响,以及这些与衰老预期之间的联系。
本研究的参与者选自一项针对65岁及以上透析和透析前患者的大型定量研究,这些患者来自新西兰的三家肾病服务机构。所有参与者均已达到慢性肾脏病(CKD)5期,接受过透析教育,但尚未开始透析或在过去6个月内未刚开始透析。
采用系列定性访谈来探究ESKD患者的决策过程及后续治疗体验。分析方法:采用框架法指导迭代分析过程。在NVivo软件中生成决策编码,然后与访谈内容进行比较。
对17名参与者进行了访谈。我们观察到,决策制定通常是一个动态过程,而非发生在某个单一时间点,并且很大程度上受到自我认知衰老、社会环境、生活事件和健康状况的影响。
本研究聚焦于参与者关于治疗的决策体验,未纳入其肾病医生或肾病团队其他成员的观点。
老年患者常将推迟透析作为一种自我效能行为。在接受透析前教育后,他们往往不会做出透析决策。推迟决策和开始透析很常见。参与者并不认为这是关于治疗的最终决定。对于老年患者,透析前护理和教育应有所不同,他们会推迟决策,直到面临明显的尿毒症症状、危及血液检测结果或肾病医生的家长式指导之时。
澳大利亚临床试验注册中心ACTRN 12611000024943;结果