Herding Jan, Ludwig Simon, Blankenburg Felix
Neurocomputation and Neuroimaging Unit, Department of Education and Psychology, Freie Universität Berlin,Berlin, Germany; Bernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience Berlin,Berlin, Germany.
Neurocomputation and Neuroimaging Unit, Department of Education and Psychology, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2017 Mar 15;11:118. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00118. eCollection 2017.
Perceptual decisions based on the comparison of two vibrotactile frequencies have been extensively studied in non-human primates. Recently, we obtained corresponding findings from human oscillatory electroencephalography (EEG) activity in the form of choice-selective modulations of upper beta band amplitude in medial premotor areas. However, the research in non-human primates as well as its human counterpart was so far limited to decisions reported by button presses. Thus, here we investigated whether the observed human beta band modulation is specific to the response modality. We recorded EEG activity from participants who compared two sequentially presented vibrotactile frequencies (f1 and f2), and decided whether f2 > f1 or f2 < f1, by performing a horizontal saccade to either side of a computer screen. Contrasting time-frequency transformed EEG data between both choices revealed that upper beta band amplitude (∼24-32 Hz) was modulated by participants' choices before actual responses were given. In particular, "f2 > f1" choices were always associated with higher beta band amplitude than "f2 < f1" choices, irrespective of whether the choice was correct or not, and independent of the specific association between saccade direction and choice. The observed pattern of beta band modulation was virtually identical to our previous results when participants responded with button presses. In line with an intentional framework of decision making, the most likely sources of the beta band modulation were now, however, located in lateral as compared to medial premotor areas including the frontal eye fields. Hence, we could show that the choice-selective modulation of upper beta band amplitude is on the one hand consistent across different response modalities (i.e., same modulation pattern in similar frequency band), and on the other hand effector specific (i.e., modulation originating from areas involved in planning and executing saccades).
基于两种振动触觉频率比较的感知决策在非人类灵长类动物中已得到广泛研究。最近,我们从人类振荡脑电图(EEG)活动中获得了相应的发现,其表现为内侧运动前区上β波段振幅的选择选择性调制。然而,迄今为止,在非人类灵长类动物以及人类中的研究都仅限于通过按键报告的决策。因此,在这里我们研究了观察到的人类β波段调制是否特定于反应方式。我们记录了参与者的EEG活动,这些参与者比较两个依次呈现的振动触觉频率(f1和f2),并通过向电脑屏幕的一侧进行水平扫视来决定f2 > f1还是f2 < f1。对比两种选择之间的时频变换EEG数据发现,在实际做出反应之前,参与者的选择会调制上β波段振幅(约24 - 32赫兹)。特别是,“f2 > f1”的选择总是比“f2 < f1”的选择具有更高的β波段振幅,无论选择是否正确,并且与扫视方向和选择之间的特定关联无关。当参与者通过按键做出反应时,观察到的β波段调制模式与我们之前的结果几乎相同。然而,与包括额眼区在内的内侧运动前区相比,现在与决策的有意框架一致的是,β波段调制最可能的来源位于外侧。因此,我们可以表明,上β波段振幅的选择选择性调制一方面在不同反应方式之间是一致的(即在相似频段具有相同的调制模式),另一方面是效应器特异性的(即调制源自参与计划和执行扫视的区域)。