Ziegelmann Matthew J, Boorjian Stephen A, Joyce Daniel D, Montgomery Brian D, Linder Brian J
Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.
Can Urol Assoc J. 2017 Mar-Apr;11(3-4):E79-E82. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.4047. Epub 2017 Mar 16.
Hemorrhagic cystitis presents a difficult clinical challenge, yet data regarding treatment options is sparse. Here, we sought to evaluate outcomes of a contemporary cohort of patients treated with intravesical formalin for hemorrhagic cystitis.
We identified a retrospective cohort of eight patients managed with formalin for hemorrhagic cystitis from 2000-2014. All patients failed prior measures, including bladder irrigation, clot evacuation, and other intravesical agents. Treatment success was defined as hematuria resolution during the given hospitalization without use of additional invasive therapies. We also evaluated treatment complications and additional treatments following hospital dismissal.
Etiology of cystitis was radiation for malignancy in all cases. The formalin concentration ranged from 1-4%, with escalation used in treatment failures. Five patients (62.5%) received a single dose of 1% formalin, two patients received two doses, and one patient received three doses. Notably, intraoperative cystography identified vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) in 50.0% of patients. Six patients (75.0%) achieved treatment success, with a median time to resolution of four days (range 1-17 days). Of those refractory to formalin, one was managed with indwelling nephrostomy tubes and one underwent cystectomy. Median followup was eight months. Of the responders, two eventually required cystectomy, one for recurrent hematuria and one for recalcitrant bladder neck contracture and bladder dysfunction. The remaining four patients (50%) required no additional therapy.
Formalin remains an important tool for treating refractory hemorrhagic cystitis, with roughly 75.0% of patients requiring no additional therapy prior to hospital discharge. Notably, there is a risk of bladder dysfunction following formalin.
出血性膀胱炎带来了严峻的临床挑战,但关于治疗选择的数据却很稀少。在此,我们试图评估当代一组接受膀胱内灌注福尔马林治疗出血性膀胱炎患者的治疗结果。
我们确定了一个回顾性队列,其中8例患者在2000年至2014年期间接受福尔马林治疗出血性膀胱炎。所有患者先前的措施均告失败,包括膀胱冲洗、血凝块清除及其他膀胱内用药。治疗成功定义为在给定的住院期间血尿消失,且无需使用额外的侵入性治疗。我们还评估了治疗并发症及出院后的后续治疗。
所有病例中膀胱炎的病因均为恶性肿瘤放疗。福尔马林浓度范围为1%至4%,治疗失败时采用浓度递增。5例患者(62.5%)接受了单剂量1%的福尔马林治疗,2例患者接受了两剂,1例患者接受了三剂。值得注意的是,术中膀胱造影显示50.0%的患者存在膀胱输尿管反流(VUR)。6例患者(75.0%)治疗成功,血尿消失的中位时间为4天(范围1至17天)。对福尔马林治疗无效的患者中,1例采用留置肾造瘘管处理,1例接受了膀胱切除术。中位随访时间为8个月。在治疗有效的患者中,2例最终需要进行膀胱切除术,1例因复发性血尿,1例因顽固性膀胱颈挛缩和膀胱功能障碍。其余4例患者(50%)无需额外治疗。
福尔马林仍然是治疗难治性出血性膀胱炎的重要工具,约75.0%的患者在出院前无需额外治疗。值得注意的是,福尔马林治疗后存在膀胱功能障碍的风险。