• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

设想一些不同的东西:一种针对学术教员发展的集体方法如何能将窃取快乐的竞争转变为学术生产力。

Imagine Something Different: How a Group Approach to Scholarly Faculty Development Can Turn Joy-Stealing Competition Into Scholarly Productivity.

作者信息

Heinrich Kathleen T

机构信息

Scholarly Development Consultant, KTH Consulting, Guilford, CT, 06437.

出版信息

J Prof Nurs. 2017 Mar-Apr;33(2):95-101. doi: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2016.08.008. Epub 2016 Aug 20.

DOI:10.1016/j.profnurs.2016.08.008
PMID:28363394
Abstract

As academic institutions across the country raise the scholarly bar for retention, promotion, and tenure, academic leaders are being asked to scholar-ready nursing faculty. With the retirement of senior scholars and too few scholar-mentors to go around, leaders often find themselves squeezed between scholarly expectations on the rise and faculty groups less than ready to meet those expectations. Today's nursing faculty present a formidable scholarly development challenge. A diverse mix of master's-prepared clinicians and recent graduates from doctor of philosophy and doctor of nursing practice programs, they come with a broad range of scholarly learning needs. These inequities not only leave many faculty feeling like scholar-impostors but also they can breed competitions that erode collegial bonds and sow the seeds of incivilities that steal scholarly joy, slow scholarly progress, and stress academic workplaces. What if leaders began imagining something different for themselves and with faculty groups? This is what can happen when leaders expand their perspective on scholarly faculty development from individual challenge to collective responsibility. More essay than research paper, this article describes how scholarly joy-stealing patterns can infiltrate faculty groups, shares thought leaders' visions for supportive scholarly communities, and offers strategies leaders can use to invite faculty groups to co-create cultures of scholarly caring.

摘要

随着全国各学术机构提高留任、晋升和终身教职的学术标准,学术领导者被要求打造具备学术能力的护理教师队伍。由于资深学者退休,且可供指导的学者型导师过少,领导者常常发现自己夹在不断提高的学术期望与尚未做好准备满足这些期望的教师群体之间。如今的护理教师队伍面临着严峻的学术发展挑战。他们由硕士学历的临床医生以及哲学博士和护理实践博士项目的应届毕业生组成,背景多样,有着广泛的学术学习需求。这些不公平现象不仅让许多教师觉得自己是学术冒牌货,还可能引发竞争,破坏同事关系,播下不文明行为的种子,剥夺学术乐趣,阻碍学术进步,给学术工作场所带来压力。要是领导者开始为自己和教师群体设想不同的情况会怎样呢?当领导者将对学术教师发展的看法从个人挑战扩展到集体责任时,就会出现这种情况。本文与其说是一篇研究论文,不如说是一篇文章,它描述了那些窃取学术乐趣的模式是如何渗透到教师群体中的,分享了思想领袖对支持性学术社区的愿景,并提供了领导者可以用来邀请教师群体共同营造学术关怀文化的策略。

相似文献

1
Imagine Something Different: How a Group Approach to Scholarly Faculty Development Can Turn Joy-Stealing Competition Into Scholarly Productivity.设想一些不同的东西:一种针对学术教员发展的集体方法如何能将窃取快乐的竞争转变为学术生产力。
J Prof Nurs. 2017 Mar-Apr;33(2):95-101. doi: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2016.08.008. Epub 2016 Aug 20.
2
How a faculty group's peer mentoring of each other's scholarship can enhance retention and recruitment.一个教师群体相互指导学术研究如何增强保留和招聘。
J Prof Nurs. 2012 Jan-Feb;28(1):5-12. doi: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2011.06.002.
3
A nursing department faculty-mentored research project.护理系教师指导的研究项目。
Nurse Educ. 2011 Jan-Feb;36(1):35-9. doi: 10.1097/NNE.0b013e3182001c39.
4
The Teacher-Scholar Project: how to help faculty groups develop scholarly skills.教师学者项目:如何帮助教师团队培养学术技能。
Nurs Educ Perspect. 2009 May-Jun;30(3):181-6.
5
The Scholarship Circle: an introduction to writing for publication for nursing faculty.奖学金圈:护理教师出版写作入门
J Med Libr Assoc. 2020 Jan;108(1):98-105. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2020.685. Epub 2020 Jan 1.
6
Developing a scholarship community.建立一个奖学金团体。
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2005;37(3):289-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1547-5069.2005.00049.x.
7
A summative evaluation of productivity and accomplishments of Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Nurse Faculty Scholars Program participants.对罗伯特·伍德·约翰逊基金会护士教师学者项目参与者的生产力和成就进行的总结性评估。
J Prof Nurs. 2018 Jul-Aug;34(4):289-295. doi: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2017.11.001. Epub 2017 Nov 7.
8
Scholarly Requirements and Support for Nursing Faculty Development and Career Advancement: A Nationwide Delphi Study.学术要求与支持对护理教师发展和职业晋升的影响:一项全国范围的德尔菲研究。
Nurs Educ Perspect. 2021;42(2):69-73. doi: 10.1097/01.NEP.0000000000000784.
9
Factors related to graduate nursing faculty scholarly productivity.与护理学研究生导师学术产出相关的因素。
Nurs Res. 1993 May-Jun;42(3):179-83.
10
Growing together: a qualitative study of leading nurse scholars in Thailand.共同成长:泰国领先护理学者的定性研究。
Int Nurs Rev. 2010 Jun;57(2):202-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1466-7657.2009.00776.x.