Oryan Ahmad, Alidadi Soodeh, Bigham-Sadegh Amin, Meimandi-Parizi Abdolhamid
Department of Pathology, School of Veterinary Medicine, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran.
Department of Pathology, School of Veterinary Medicine, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran.
Int J Biol Macromol. 2017 Aug;101:630-637. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.03.148. Epub 2017 Mar 28.
This study compared the regeneration potentials of the hydroxyapatite (HA) and beta-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP) alone or in combination with a HA:TCP ratio of 30:70 in the critical-sized radial bone defects of rats. Bilateral 60 radial bone defects created were randomly divided into six equal groups (n=10 defects/group) including autograft, untreated or defect, chitosan-gelatin-platelet gel (CGP), CGP-HA, CGP-TCP and CGP-HA/TCP. The defects were evaluated by radiography, morphology, histopathology, histomorphometry, CT scan, scanning electron microscopy and biomechanical testing after eight weeks. Compared with the untreated and CGP-HA groups, the CGP and CGP-HA/TCP groups showed significantly higher new bone formation, bone volume, and mechanical properties. The CGP-HA and CGP-TCP scaffolds showed low biodegradability, whereas the CGP scaffolds were completely degraded. Osteoconductivity and osteoinductivity of the CGP and CGP-HA/TCP scaffolds were superior to the CGP-HA ones. The untreated and CGP-HA groups repaired mostly through fibrosis, while there were evidence of higher bone formation in the autograft, CGP and CGP-HA/TCP groups. In conclusion, addition of HA or β-TCP alone into the CGP scaffolds impaired bone regeneration, while bone regeneration with the CGP and CGP-HA/TCP scaffolds was comparable with the autograft. Therefore, the CGP-HA/TCP scaffold can be a possible option to substitute the autologous bone grafting.
本研究比较了单独使用羟基磷灰石(HA)和β-磷酸三钙(β-TCP),以及HA与TCP比例为30:70组合时,在大鼠临界尺寸桡骨缺损中的再生潜力。创建的双侧60处桡骨缺损被随机分为六个相等的组(每组n = 10处缺损),包括自体移植组、未处理或缺损组、壳聚糖-明胶-血小板凝胶(CGP)组、CGP-HA组、CGP-TCP组和CGP-HA/TCP组。八周后,通过放射照相、形态学、组织病理学、组织形态计量学、CT扫描、扫描电子显微镜和生物力学测试对缺损进行评估。与未处理组和CGP-HA组相比,CGP组和CGP-HA/TCP组显示出显著更高的新骨形成、骨体积和力学性能。CGP-HA和CGP-TCP支架显示出低生物降解性,而CGP支架完全降解。CGP和CGP-HA/TCP支架的骨传导性和骨诱导性优于CGP-HA支架。未处理组和CGP-HA组主要通过纤维化修复,而在自体移植组、CGP组和CGP-HA/TCP组中有更高骨形成的证据。总之,单独向CGP支架中添加HA或β-TCP会损害骨再生,而CGP和CGP-HA/TCP支架的骨再生与自体移植相当。因此,CGP-HA/TCP支架可能是替代自体骨移植的一个可行选择。