Shahsavari-Pour Sheila, Aliabadi Ehsan, Latifi Mona, Zareifard Nehle, Namavar Mohammad Reza, Talaei-Khozani Tahereh
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz Iran.
Department of Tissue Engineering, National Institute of Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, Iran.
Iran J Med Sci. 2018 Nov;43(6):633-644.
Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and bioceramics such as hydroxyapatite (HA) and zirconium oxide (ZrO) are used to reconstruct mandibular defects. We sought to determine the synergistic effects of HA/ZrO and PRP and compare their osteogenic activity.
ZrO scaffolds were constructed by the slurry method and were then coated with HA and impregnated by PRP/heparan sulfate (HS). Bilateral mandibular defects were created in 26 male rabbits. In 20 rabbits, the left defects were treated with HA/ZrO/PRP (Group 1) and the corresponding right defects were filled with HA/ZrO (Group 2). The 6 remaining models were treated with PRP gels at both sides (Group 3). The osteoconductivity of HA/ZrO/PRP was compared with that of HA/ZrO or PRP by radiological and histological methods after the follow-up period, at weeks 2, 6 and 8. The statistical analyses were performed by ANOVA and LSD using SPSS, version 16.0, for Windows (P<0.05).
After 2 weeks, the percentage of the surface occupied by bone was significantly higher in the HA/ZrO/PRP-treated defects than in the PRP-treated defects (P=0.007). Osteoblast and osteocyte counts were higher significantly in the PRP-treated group (P=0.032); however, the cells had not started matrix formation on a large scale and just small islands of osteoid with trapped osteocytes were observed. In the long term, the regenerative potential of all the scaffolds was the same.
HA/ZrO showed a superior osteoconductive capacity over PRP in the short term; however, they showed no long-term synergic effects.
富含血小板血浆(PRP)以及生物陶瓷如羟基磷灰石(HA)和氧化锆(ZrO)被用于下颌骨缺损的重建。我们试图确定HA/ZrO和PRP的协同作用,并比较它们的成骨活性。
采用浆料法构建ZrO支架,然后用HA涂层并通过PRP/硫酸乙酰肝素(HS)进行浸渍。在26只雄性兔子身上制造双侧下颌骨缺损。在20只兔子中,左侧缺损用HA/ZrO/PRP治疗(第1组),相应的右侧缺损用HA/ZrO填充(第2组)。其余6只模型双侧用PRP凝胶治疗(第3组)。在随访期的第2、6和8周后,通过放射学和组织学方法比较HA/ZrO/PRP与HA/ZrO或PRP的骨传导性。使用Windows版SPSS 16.0软件通过方差分析和最小显著差异法进行统计分析(P<0.05)。
2周后,HA/ZrO/PRP治疗的缺损处骨占据的表面积百分比显著高于PRP治疗的缺损处(P = 0.007)。PRP治疗组的成骨细胞和骨细胞计数显著更高(P = 0.032);然而,细胞尚未开始大规模形成基质,仅观察到有被困骨细胞的小骨样岛。从长期来看,所有支架的再生潜力相同。
短期内,HA/ZrO显示出比PRP更强的骨传导能力;然而,它们没有显示出长期协同效应。