Beebe Dean W, Field Julie, Milller Megan M, Miller Lauren E, LeBlond Elizabeth
Division of Behavioral Medicine and Clinical Psychology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine,Cincinnati, OH.
Immaculate Heart of Mary School, Cincinnati, OH.
Sleep. 2017 Feb 1;40(2). doi: 10.1093/sleep/zsw035.
Investigate whether a realistic "dose" of shortened sleep, relative to a well-rested state, causes a decline in adolescents' learning and an increase in inattentive and sleepy behaviors in a simulated classroom setting.
Eighty-seven healthy 14.0- to 16.9-year olds underwent a 3-week sleep manipulation protocol, including two 5-night sleep manipulation conditions presented in a randomly counterbalanced within-subjects cross-over design. Wake time was held constant. Bedtimes were set to induce Short Sleep (SS; 6.5 hours in bed) versus Healthy Sleep (HS; 10 hours in bed). During the morning at the end of each condition, participants underwent a simulated classroom procedure in which they viewed lecture-based educational videotapes and completed relevant quizzes. Their behaviors in the simulated classroom were later coded by condition-blind raters for evidence of inattention and sleepiness.
Adolescents had a longer average sleep period during HS (9.1 hours) than SS (6.5 hours). Compared to scores during HS, adolescents scored significantly lower on the quiz, showed more behaviors suggestive of inattention and sleepiness in the simulated classroom, and were reported by adolescents themselves and by their parents to be more inattentive and sleepy during SS. However, the impact of the manipulation on quiz scores was not mediated by changes in attention or sleepiness.
Although effect sizes were modest, these findings suggest that previously-reported correlations between sleep duration and academic performance reflect true cause-effect relationships. Findings add to the growing evidence that the chronically shortened sleep experienced by many adolescents on school nights adversely impacts their functioning and health.
研究相对于充分休息状态,实际的短睡眠“剂量”是否会导致青少年学习能力下降,并在模拟课堂环境中增加注意力不集中和困倦行为。
87名年龄在14.0至16.9岁之间的健康青少年接受了为期3周的睡眠控制方案,包括两种为期5晚的睡眠控制条件,采用随机平衡的受试者内交叉设计。起床时间保持不变。就寝时间设定为诱导短睡眠(SS;卧床6.5小时)与健康睡眠(HS;卧床10小时)。在每种条件结束后的早晨,参与者进行了模拟课堂程序,他们观看基于讲座的教育录像带并完成相关测验。他们在模拟课堂中的行为后来由不知情的评分者进行编码,以寻找注意力不集中和困倦的证据。
青少年在HS期间的平均睡眠时间(9.1小时)比SS期间(6.5小时)更长。与HS期间的分数相比,青少年在测验中的得分显著更低,在模拟课堂中表现出更多注意力不集中和困倦的行为,并且青少年自己和他们的父母报告在SS期间他们更注意力不集中和困倦。然而,控制措施对测验分数的影响并未通过注意力或困倦程度的变化来介导。
尽管效应量适中,但这些发现表明,先前报道的睡眠时间与学业成绩之间的相关性反映了真正的因果关系。这些发现进一步证明了越来越多的证据,即许多青少年在上学日晚上长期睡眠不足会对他们的功能和健康产生不利影响。