Bobos Pavlos, Lalone Emily A, Grewal Ruby, MacDermid Joy C
1 Roth|McFarlane Hand and Upper Limb Centre Clinical Research Lab, St. Joseph's Health Centre, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
Hand (N Y). 2018 Jul;13(4):441-447. doi: 10.1177/1558944717701242. Epub 2017 Apr 1.
The relationship of routinely measured grip and motion measures may be related to hand dexterity. This has not yet been thoroughly examined following a distal radius fracture (DRF). The purpose of this study was to investigate if impairments in range of motion (ROM) and grip strength predict hand dexterity 6 months following a DRF.
Patients with DRFs were recruited from a specialized hand clinic. Hand grip was assessed with a J-Tech dynamometer; ROM was measured using standard landmarks and a manual goniometer. Multiple regression analyses were performed to identify whether potential predictors (grip, ROM, age, hand dominance, and sex) were associated with 3-month or 6-month outcomes in large- and small-object subtests of the NK dexterity test in the affected hand.
Age, sex, and arc motion for radial-ulnar deviation were significant predictors of large-object hand dexterity explaining the 23% of the variation. For small-object hand dexterity, age and flexion-extension arc motion were significant predictors explaining 11% of the variation at 3 month after the fracture (n = 391). At 6 months post injury (n = 319), grip strength, arc motion for flexion-extension, and age were found to be significant predictors of large-object dexterity explaining 34% of the variance. For the small objects, age, grip strength, sex, and arc motion of radial-ulnar deviation explained 25% of the variation.
Although this confirms that the impairments in ROM and grip that occur after a DRF can explain almost one-third of the variation in hand dexterity, it also suggests the need for dexterity testing to provide more accurate assessment.
常规测量的握力与运动指标之间的关系可能与手部灵活性有关。桡骨远端骨折(DRF)后,这一关系尚未得到充分研究。本研究的目的是调查运动范围(ROM)和握力受损是否能预测DRF后6个月的手部灵活性。
从一家专门的手部诊所招募DRF患者。使用J-Tech测力计评估握力;使用标准体表标志和手动角度计测量ROM。进行多元回归分析,以确定潜在预测因素(握力、ROM、年龄、利手和性别)是否与患手NK灵活性测试的大物体和小物体子测试中的3个月或6个月结果相关。
年龄、性别和桡尺偏斜的弧运动是大物体手部灵活性的显著预测因素,解释了23%的变异。对于小物体手部灵活性,年龄和屈伸弧运动是显著预测因素,在骨折后3个月解释了11%的变异(n = 391)。在受伤后6个月(n = 319),握力、屈伸弧运动和年龄被发现是大物体灵活性的显著预测因素,解释了34%的方差。对于小物体,年龄、握力、性别和桡尺偏斜的弧运动解释了25%的变异。
虽然这证实了DRF后出现的ROM和握力受损可以解释手部灵活性近三分之一的变异,但也表明需要进行灵活性测试以提供更准确的评估。