Bobos Pavlos, MacDermid Joy C, Nazari Goris, Lalone Emily A, Ferreira Louis, Grewal Ruby
Department of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Western's Bone and Joint Institute.
Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Health Care Research, Institute of Health Policy Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto.
Physiother Can. 2021 Winter;73(1):56-65. doi: 10.3138/ptc-2019-0037.
Joint protection has been introduced as a self-management strategy for people with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and osteoarthritis (OA) of the hand. The purpose of this study was to conduct an overview of systematic reviews (SRs) and critically appraise the evidence to establish the current effectiveness of joint protection for people with hand RA and OA. A comprehensive search was conducted of six databases from January 2008 to May 2018. SRs that evaluated the effectiveness of joint protection for people with hand arthritis were eligible for inclusion. The A MeaSurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) 2 checklist was used to assess the methodological quality of each SR. Nine SRs were included: two were rated as high quality, and seven were rated as low quality. Seven of the nine did not take into account risk of bias when interpreting or discussing their findings, six did not assess publication bias, and five did not register their protocol. The high-quality reviews found no clinically important benefit of joint protection for pain, hand function, and grip strength levels. The low-quality reviews reported improvements in function, pain, grip strength, fatigue, depression, self-efficacy, joint protection behaviours, and disease symptoms in people with RA. High-quality evidence from high-quality reviews found a lack of any clinically important benefit of joint protection programmes for pain, hand function, and grip strength outcomes, whereas low-quality evidence from low-quality reviews found improvements in these outcomes.
关节保护已被引入作为手部类风湿性关节炎(RA)和骨关节炎(OA)患者的一种自我管理策略。本研究的目的是对系统评价(SRs)进行概述,并严格评估证据,以确定关节保护对手部RA和OA患者的当前有效性。从2008年1月至2018年5月对六个数据库进行了全面检索。评估关节保护对手部关节炎患者有效性的SRs符合纳入标准。使用评估系统评价的测量工具(AMSTAR)2清单来评估每个SR的方法学质量。纳入了9项SRs:2项被评为高质量,7项被评为低质量。9项中的7项在解释或讨论其研究结果时未考虑偏倚风险,6项未评估发表偏倚,5项未注册其方案。高质量评价发现关节保护在疼痛、手部功能和握力水平方面没有临床重要益处。低质量评价报告了RA患者在功能、疼痛、握力、疲劳、抑郁、自我效能、关节保护行为和疾病症状方面的改善。高质量评价的高质量证据发现关节保护方案在疼痛、手部功能和握力结果方面缺乏任何临床重要益处,而低质量评价的低质量证据发现这些结果有所改善。