Lee Ellie
University of Kent, UK.
Fem Psychol. 2017 Feb;27(1):15-33. doi: 10.1177/0959353516678010. Epub 2017 Feb 12.
Between February 2012 and March 2015, the claim that sex selection abortion was taking place in Britain and that action needed to be taken to stop it dominated debate in Britain about abortion. Situating an analysis in sociological and social psychological approaches to the construction of social problems, particularly those considering "feminised" re-framings of anti-abortion arguments, this paper presents an account of this debate. Based on analysis of media coverage, Parliamentary debate and official documents, we focus on claims about grounds (evidence) made to sustain the case that sex selection abortion is a British social problem and highlight how abortion was problematised in new ways. Perhaps most notable, we argue, was the level of largely unchallenged vilification of abortion doctors and providers, on the grounds that they are both law violators and participants in acts of discrimination and violence against women, especially those of Asian heritage. We draw attention to the role of claims made by feminists in the media and in Parliament about "gendercide" as part of this process and argue that those supportive of access to abortion need to critically assess both this aspect of the events and also consider arguments about the problems of "medical power" in the light of what took place.
在2012年2月至2015年3月期间,关于英国存在性别选择堕胎现象且需采取行动加以制止的说法主导了英国关于堕胎问题的辩论。本文将分析置于社会学和社会心理学对社会问题建构的研究方法之中,尤其是那些考虑反堕胎论点的“女性化”重塑的研究方法,进而阐述这场辩论。基于对媒体报道、议会辩论及官方文件的分析,我们聚焦于为支持性别选择堕胎是英国社会问题这一观点而提出的依据(证据),并着重指出堕胎问题是如何以新的方式被问题化的。我们认为,或许最值得注意的是,堕胎医生和堕胎服务提供者在很大程度上遭到了无端诋毁,理由是他们既是违法者,又是对妇女,尤其是对亚裔妇女实施歧视和暴力行为的参与者。我们提请注意女权主义者在媒体和议会中就“性别灭绝”所提出的主张在这一过程中所起的作用,并指出支持堕胎权利的人士需要审慎评估这一事件的这一方面,同时也应根据所发生的事情思考有关“医疗权力”问题的论点。