Scheepmans Kristien, Dierckx de Casterlé Bernadette, Paquay Louis, Van Gansbeke Hendrik, Milisen Koen
Nursing Department, Wit-Gele Kruis van Vlaanderen, Brussels, Belgium.
Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Academic Centre for Nursing and Midwifery, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2017 Aug;65(8):1769-1776. doi: 10.1111/jgs.14880. Epub 2017 Mar 28.
To determine the prevalence, types, frequency, and duration of restraint use in older adults receiving home nursing care and to determine factors involved in the decision-making process for restraint use and application.
Cross-sectional survey of restraint use in older adults receiving home care completed by primary care nurses.
Homes of older adults receiving care from a home nursing organization in Belgium.
Randomized sample of older adults receiving home care (N = 6,397; mean age 80.6; 66.8% female).
For each participant, nurses completed an investigator-constructed and -validated questionnaire collecting information demographic, clinical, and behavioral characteristics and aspects of restraint use. A broad definition of restraint was used that includes a range of restrictive actions.
Restraints were used in 24.7% of the participants, mostly on a daily basis (85%) and often for a long period (54.5%, 24 h/d). The most common reason for restraint use was safety (50.2%). Other reasons were that the individual wanted to remain at home longer, which necessitated the use of restraints (18.2%) and to provide respite for the informal caregiver (8.6%). The latter played an important role in the decision and application process. The physician was less involved in the process. In 64.5% of cases, there was no evaluation after restraint use was initiated.
Use of restraints is common in older adults receiving home care nursing in Belgium. These results contribute to a better understanding of the complexity of use of restraints in home care, a situation that may be even more complex than in nursing homes and acute hospital settings.
确定接受家庭护理的老年人中使用约束措施的患病率、类型、频率和持续时间,并确定约束措施使用和应用决策过程中的相关因素。
由初级护理护士完成的对接受家庭护理的老年人使用约束措施的横断面调查。
比利时一家家庭护理机构为老年人提供护理服务的家庭。
接受家庭护理的老年人随机样本(N = 6397;平均年龄80.6岁;66.8%为女性)。
护士为每位参与者填写一份由研究者编制并验证的问卷,收集人口统计学、临床和行为特征以及约束措施使用方面的信息。使用了对约束措施的宽泛定义,包括一系列限制行动。
24.7%的参与者使用了约束措施,大多数是每天使用(85%),且经常使用较长时间(54.5%,每天24小时)。使用约束措施最常见的原因是安全(50.2%)。其他原因包括个人希望在家中停留更长时间,这需要使用约束措施(18.2%)以及为非正式护理人员提供喘息机会(8.6%)。后者在决策和应用过程中发挥了重要作用。医生参与该过程的程度较低。在64.5%的案例中,开始使用约束措施后未进行评估。
在比利时接受家庭护理的老年人中,使用约束措施很常见。这些结果有助于更好地理解家庭护理中使用约束措施的复杂性,这种情况可能比养老院和急症医院环境更为复杂。