Arexis Mahé, Maquestiaux François, Gaspelin Nicholas, Ruthruff Eric, Didierjean André
Université de Franche-Comté, Besançon, France.
University of California, Davis, California, USA.
Br J Psychol. 2017 May;108(2):259-275. doi: 10.1111/bjop.12197. Epub 2016 Mar 28.
Drivers face frequent distraction on the roadways, but little is known about situations placing them at risk of misallocating visual attention. To investigate this issue, we asked participants to search for a red target embedded within simulated driving scenes (photographs taken from inside a car) in three experiments. Distraction was induced by presenting, via a GPS unit, red or green distractors positioned in an irrelevant location at which the target never appeared. If the salient distractor captures attention, visual search should be slower on distractor-present trials than distractor-absent trials. In Experiment 1, salient distractors yielded no such capture effect. In Experiment 2, we decreased the frequency of the salient distractor from 50% of trials to only 10% or 20% of trials. Capture effects were almost five times larger for the 10% occurrence group than for the 20% occurrence group. In Experiment 3, the amount of available central resources was manipulated by asking participants to either simultaneously monitor or ignore a stream of spoken digits. Capture effects were much larger for the dual-task group than for the single-task group. In summary, these findings identify risk factors for attentional capture in real-world driving scenes: distractor rarity and diversion of attention.
驾驶员在道路上面临频繁的注意力分散,但对于使他们有视觉注意力分配错误风险的情况却知之甚少。为了研究这个问题,我们在三个实验中要求参与者在模拟驾驶场景(从车内拍摄的照片)中寻找嵌入其中的红色目标。通过全球定位系统(GPS)设备呈现位于目标从未出现的无关位置的红色或绿色干扰物来诱发注意力分散。如果显著干扰物吸引了注意力,那么在有干扰物呈现的试验中视觉搜索应该比没有干扰物的试验更慢。在实验1中,显著干扰物没有产生这样的捕获效应。在实验2中,我们将显著干扰物出现的频率从试验次数的50%降低到仅10%或20%。对于出现频率为10%的组,捕获效应几乎是出现频率为20%组的五倍。在实验3中,通过要求参与者同时监测或忽略一连串的语音数字来操纵可用的中央资源量。双任务组的捕获效应比单任务组大得多。总之,这些发现确定了现实世界驾驶场景中注意力捕获的风险因素:干扰物的稀缺性和注意力的转移。