• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2014年国际泌尿病理学会前列腺癌分级系统对接受根治性前列腺切除术患者的预测价值及长期随访

Predictive value of the 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology grading system for prostate cancer in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy with long-term follow-up.

作者信息

Grogan Judith, Gupta Ruta, Mahon Kate L, Stricker Phillip D, Haynes Anne-Maree, Delprado Warick, Turner Jennifer, Horvath Lisa G, Kench James G

机构信息

Cancer Research Program, Kinghorn Cancer Centre/Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia.

Department of Tissue Pathology and Diagnostic Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

出版信息

BJU Int. 2017 Nov;120(5):651-658. doi: 10.1111/bju.13857. Epub 2017 Apr 30.

DOI:10.1111/bju.13857
PMID:28371244
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the relationship between the International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) 2014 grading system, biochemical recurrence (BCR) and clinical recurrence (CLR) after radical prostatectomy (RP), to determine whether the 2014 ISUP grading system is a better predictor of survival compared with the previous Gleason scoring systems, and to investigate whether incorporation of the tertiary pattern/grade into the ISUP scoring system significantly improves its efficacy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 635 RP cases (1991-1999) were identified from a database at a single institution. A histopathology review was performed to re-grade the cases as per the ISUP 2014 grading system. All relevant clinicopathological data and clinical follow-up (median [range] 15.25 [0.3-26] years) were obtained. Log-rank, Kaplan-Meier, Cox regression and Harrell's concordance c-indices analyses were performed.

RESULTS

At a median follow-up of 15 years, 276 patients (44%) had BCR and 41 (7%) had CLR. Grade Groups 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 were seen in 112 (18%), 307 (48%), 129 (20%), 33 (5%) and 54 patients (9%), respectively: 337 (53%) were upgraded, while 70 (11%) were downgraded compared with the 1992 Gleason system. Grade Group (hazard ratio [HR] 4.9; P < 0.001) and preoperative prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level (HR 1.4; P < 0.001) were independent predictors of BCR. Only Grade Group 5 (HR 12.3; P = 0.02), preoperative PSA (HR 1.6; P < 0.001), stage pT3b (HR 3.1; P = 0.03) and pT4 (HR 12.4; P < 0.001) independently predicted CLR. Harrell's c-indices showed that the 2014 ISUP grading system was a significantly better predictor of BCR and CLR as well as prostate cancer-specific death, compared with the 2005 ISUP modified Gleason system. The replacement of the secondary pattern by the tertiary pattern did not alter the prognostic efficacy of the ISUP 2014 grading system.

CONCLUSIONS

The ISUP 2014 grading system is a significant independent predictor of both BCR and CLR, outperforming the 2005 ISUP modified Gleason system. This classification system has the potential to influence clinical decision-making after RP.

摘要

目的

评估国际泌尿病理学会(ISUP)2014年分级系统与根治性前列腺切除术(RP)后生化复发(BCR)及临床复发(CLR)之间的关系,确定2014年ISUP分级系统与既往Gleason评分系统相比是否为更好的生存预测指标,并研究将三级模式/分级纳入ISUP评分系统是否能显著提高其效能。

患者与方法

从单一机构的数据库中识别出635例RP病例(1991 - 1999年)。进行组织病理学复查,按照ISUP 2014年分级系统对病例重新分级。获取所有相关的临床病理数据及临床随访资料(中位[范围]15.25[0.3 - 26]年)。进行对数秩检验、Kaplan - Meier分析、Cox回归分析及Harrell一致性c指数分析。

结果

中位随访15年时,276例患者(44%)发生BCR,41例患者(7%)发生CLR。1级、2级、3级、4级和5级组分别见于112例(18%)、307例(48%)、129例(20%)、33例(5%)和54例患者(9%):与1992年Gleason系统相比,337例(53%)病例分级上调,70例(11%)病例分级下调。分级组(风险比[HR]4.9;P < 0.001)及术前前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)水平(HR 1.4;P < 0.001)是BCR的独立预测因素。仅5级组(HR 12.3;P = 0.02)、术前PSA(HR 1.6;P < 0.001)、pT3b期(HR 3.1;P = 0.03)和pT4期(HR 12.4;P < 0.001)独立预测CLR。Harrell c指数显示,与2005年ISUP改良Gleason系统相比,2014年ISUP分级系统对BCR、CLR以及前列腺癌特异性死亡的预测能力显著更好。用三级模式替代二级模式并未改变ISUP 2014年分级系统的预后效能。

结论

ISUP 2014年分级系统是BCR和CLR的重要独立预测指标,优于2005年ISUP改良Gleason系统。该分类系统有可能影响RP后的临床决策。

相似文献

1
Predictive value of the 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology grading system for prostate cancer in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy with long-term follow-up.2014年国际泌尿病理学会前列腺癌分级系统对接受根治性前列腺切除术患者的预测价值及长期随访
BJU Int. 2017 Nov;120(5):651-658. doi: 10.1111/bju.13857. Epub 2017 Apr 30.
2
The impact of the 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology consensus guidelines on Gleason grading - a matched-pair analysis.2005年国际泌尿病理学会 Gleason 分级共识指南的影响——配对分析
BJU Int. 2016 Jun;117(6):883-9. doi: 10.1111/bju.13439. Epub 2016 Feb 22.
3
Biparametric Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version2 and International Society of Urological Pathology Grade Predict Biochemical Recurrence after Radical Prostatectomy.前列腺影像报告和数据系统 2 版联合国际泌尿病理学会分级预测前列腺癌根治术后生化复发。
Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2018 Aug;16(4):e817-e829. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2018.02.011. Epub 2018 Feb 24.
4
Impact of the 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology Grading System on Concept of High-Risk Prostate Cancer: Comparison of Long-Term Oncological Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy.2014年国际泌尿病理学会分级系统对高危前列腺癌概念的影响:根治性前列腺切除术患者长期肿瘤学结局的比较
Front Oncol. 2019 Nov 19;9:1272. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2019.01272. eCollection 2019.
5
Prognostic Significance of Percentage and Architectural Types of Contemporary Gleason Pattern 4 Prostate Cancer in Radical Prostatectomy.当代前列腺癌 Gleason 模式 4 的百分比和结构类型对根治性前列腺切除术预后的意义。
Am J Surg Pathol. 2016 Oct;40(10):1400-6. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000000691.
6
Prognostic Gleason grade grouping: data based on the modified Gleason scoring system.预后格里森分级分组:基于改良格里森评分系统的数据。
BJU Int. 2013 May;111(5):753-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11611.x. Epub 2013 Mar 6.
7
Optimization of the 2014 Gleason grade grouping in a Canadian cohort of patients with localized prostate cancer.优化加拿大局限性前列腺癌患者队列中 2014 年格里森分级分组。
BJU Int. 2019 Apr;123(4):624-631. doi: 10.1111/bju.14512. Epub 2018 Sep 11.
8
The prognostic significance of the 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grading system for prostate cancer.2014年国际泌尿病理学会(ISUP)前列腺癌分级系统的预后意义。
Pathology. 2015 Oct;47(6):515-9. doi: 10.1097/PAT.0000000000000315.
9
Prognostic Value of the New Prostate Cancer International Society of Urological Pathology Grade Groups.新的前列腺癌国际泌尿病理学会分级组的预后价值
Front Med (Lausanne). 2017 Sep 29;4:157. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2017.00157. eCollection 2017.
10
SOCS3 Immunohistochemical Expression Seems to Support the 2005 and 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Modified Gleason Grading System.SOCS3免疫组化表达似乎支持2005年和2014年国际泌尿病理学会(ISUP)改良的Gleason分级系统。
Prostate. 2017 May;77(6):597-603. doi: 10.1002/pros.23299. Epub 2017 Feb 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of circ Expression on Prostate Cancer Malignancy and Tumor Growth.环状RNA表达对前列腺癌恶性程度和肿瘤生长的影响。
Acta Histochem Cytochem. 2025 Jun 24;58(3):133-141. doi: 10.1267/ahc.25-00008. Epub 2025 Jun 18.
2
An MRI radiomics model for predicting a prostate-specific antigen response following abiraterone treatment in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.一种用于预测转移性去势抵抗性前列腺癌患者接受阿比特龙治疗后前列腺特异性抗原反应的MRI影像组学模型。
Front Oncol. 2025 Jan 27;15:1491848. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1491848. eCollection 2025.
3
Investigating the prognostic utility of promoter methylation in prostate cancer.
研究启动子甲基化在前列腺癌中的预后效用。
BJUI Compass. 2024 Oct 30;5(12):1299-1306. doi: 10.1002/bco2.445. eCollection 2024 Dec.
4
Navigating the evolving diagnostic and therapeutic landscape of low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer.低危和中危前列腺癌诊断与治疗领域的不断演变。
Asian J Androl. 2024 Nov 1;26(6):549-556. doi: 10.4103/aja20249. Epub 2024 May 3.
5
Genetic ancestry and radical prostatectomy findings in Hispanic/Latino patients.西班牙裔/拉丁裔患者的遗传血统与根治性前列腺切除术结果
Front Oncol. 2024 Apr 3;14:1338250. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1338250. eCollection 2024.
6
Development of machine learning prognostic models for overall survival of prostate cancer patients with lymph node-positive.机器学习预后模型在淋巴结阳性前列腺癌患者总生存中的开发。
Sci Rep. 2023 Oct 27;13(1):18424. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-45804-x.
7
Impact of Grade Groups on Prostate Cancer-Specific and Other-Cause Mortality: Competing Risk Analysis from a Large Single Institution Series.分级组对前列腺癌特异性死亡率和其他原因死亡率的影响:来自大型单机构系列研究的竞争风险分析
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Apr 19;13(8):1963. doi: 10.3390/cancers13081963.
8
Prostate cancer grading, time to go back to the future.前列腺癌分级,是时候回归未来了。
BJU Int. 2021 Feb;127(2):165-168. doi: 10.1111/bju.15298. Epub 2020 Nov 27.
9
Aberrant SOCS3 Promoter Methylation as a Noninvasive Diagnostic Biomarker for Locally Advanced Prostate Cancer.异常的细胞因子信号转导抑制因子3(SOCS3)启动子甲基化作为局部晚期前列腺癌的非侵入性诊断生物标志物
Medeni Med J. 2020;35(2):99-105. doi: 10.5222/MMJ.2020.58708. Epub 2020 Jun 30.
10
Identification of areas of grading difficulties in prostate cancer and comparison with artificial intelligence assisted grading.识别前列腺癌分级困难区域,并与人工智能辅助分级进行比较。
Virchows Arch. 2020 Dec;477(6):777-786. doi: 10.1007/s00428-020-02858-w. Epub 2020 Jun 15.