• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[帕利哌酮不同剂型用于精神分裂症患者的临床及经济效率比较评估]

[Comparative evaluation of clinical and economic efficiency of paliperidone in various dosage forms used in patients with schizophrenia].

作者信息

D'yakov I N, Zyryanov S K

机构信息

Mechnikov Research Institute of Vaccines and Sera.

Moscow, Russia ,Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Ministry of Health, Moscow, Russia.

出版信息

Zh Nevrol Psikhiatr Im S S Korsakova. 2017;117(2):85-92. doi: 10.17116/jnevro20171172185-92.

DOI:10.17116/jnevro20171172185-92
PMID:28374699
Abstract

AIM

To evaluate clinical and economic efficacy of schizophrenia treatment with three forms of paliperidone (peroral form, intramuscular injections once a month and once in three month).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Pharmacoeconomic analysis based on the results of earlier foreign randomized clinical studies on paliperidone in treatment of schizophrenia was carried out. Indirect comparison of different medication forms of paliperidone compared to placebo was performed. The analysis of costs was based on a Markov model built for the study. Two categories of costs: costs of pharmacological treatment with paliperidone and costs of disease exacerbation due to the violation of treatment regimen were considered. To assess pharmacoeconomic efficacy of paliperidone, a cost-benefit analysis with calculation of cost utility ratio (CUR) and incremental cost utility ratio (ICUR) was used.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

In view of the influence on the budget, all forms of paliperidone have similar pharmacoeconomic efficacy with the advantage of prolonged release injectable (depot) forms that increase patient's adherence to treatment. As a result, CUR of injectable forms was lower compared to that of the peroral form by 11,1 and 46,3% of month and 3-month forms, respectively. ICUR for paliperidone used once in 3 month (trevicta) was more effective compared to paliperidone used monthly (xeplion). It has been concluded that paliperidone for prolonged release injections used once in 3 month is most pharmacoeconomically effective.

摘要

目的

评估三种形式的帕利哌酮(口服制剂、每月一次和每三个月一次的肌肉注射制剂)治疗精神分裂症的临床和经济疗效。

材料与方法

基于先前国外关于帕利哌酮治疗精神分裂症的随机临床研究结果进行药物经济学分析。对帕利哌酮不同剂型与安慰剂进行间接比较。成本分析基于为该研究构建的马尔可夫模型。考虑两类成本:帕利哌酮药物治疗成本和因治疗方案中断导致的疾病加重成本。为评估帕利哌酮的药物经济学疗效,采用成本效益分析并计算成本效用比(CUR)和增量成本效用比(ICUR)。

结果与结论

鉴于对预算的影响,所有形式的帕利哌酮具有相似的药物经济学疗效,长效注射(储库)剂型具有优势,可提高患者的治疗依从性。结果,注射剂型的CUR分别比口服剂型低11.1%(每月剂型)和46.3%(每三个月剂型)。每三个月使用一次的帕利哌酮(trevicta)的ICUR比每月使用一次的帕利哌酮(xeplion)更有效。得出结论:每三个月使用一次的长效注射用帕利哌酮在药物经济学上最有效。

相似文献

1
[Comparative evaluation of clinical and economic efficiency of paliperidone in various dosage forms used in patients with schizophrenia].[帕利哌酮不同剂型用于精神分裂症患者的临床及经济效率比较评估]
Zh Nevrol Psikhiatr Im S S Korsakova. 2017;117(2):85-92. doi: 10.17116/jnevro20171172185-92.
2
Cost Effectiveness of Paliperidone Long-Acting Injectable Versus Other Antipsychotics for the Maintenance Treatment of Schizophrenia in France.在法国,帕利哌酮长效注射剂与其他抗精神病药物用于精神分裂症维持治疗的成本效益分析
Pharmacoeconomics. 2016 Apr;34(4):363-91. doi: 10.1007/s40273-015-0348-x.
3
Cost effectiveness of paliperidone palmitate versus oral antipsychotics in patients with schizophrenia and a history of criminal justice involvement.帕利哌酮棕榈酸酯与口服抗精神病药物治疗有刑事司法介入史的精神分裂症患者的成本效益
J Med Econ. 2015;18(8):637-45. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2015.1037307. Epub 2015 May 6.
4
Projecting the Potential Effect of Using Paliperidone Palmitate Once-Monthly and Once-Every-3-Months Long-Acting Injections Among Medicaid Beneficiaries with Schizophrenia.预测帕利哌酮棕榈酸酯每月 1 次和每 3 个月 1 次长效注射在 Medicaid 精神分裂症受益人群中的潜在效果。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2018 Aug;24(8):759-768. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2018.24.8.759.
5
Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Aripiprazole Once-Monthly for the Treatment of Schizophrenia in the UK.阿立哌唑每月一次治疗英国精神分裂症的成本效益分析。
J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2015 Dec;18(4):185-200.
6
The clinical and economic impact of three-monthly long-acting formulation of paliperidone palmitate versus the one-monthly formulation in the treatment of schizophrenia in France: A cost-utility study.长效棕榈酸帕利哌酮三月剂型与一月剂型治疗法国精神分裂症的临床和经济影响:一项成本-效用研究。
Encephale. 2019 Dec;45(6):459-467. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2019.03.001. Epub 2019 Sep 18.
7
Economic analysis of paliperidone long-acting injectable for chronic schizophrenia in Portugal.帕利哌酮长效注射剂用于葡萄牙慢性精神分裂症的经济学分析。
J Med Econ. 2016 Sep;19(9):913-21. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2016.1184156. Epub 2016 May 13.
8
Cost-effectiveness of 3-month paliperidone therapy for chronic schizophrenia in the Netherlands.荷兰3个月帕利哌酮治疗慢性精神分裂症的成本效益
J Med Econ. 2017 Nov;20(11):1187-1199. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2017.1363050. Epub 2017 Aug 14.
9
Cost-effectiveness of 3-month paliperidone treatment for chronic schizophrenia in Spain.3个月帕利哌酮治疗西班牙慢性精神分裂症的成本效益
J Med Econ. 2017 Oct;20(10):1039-1047. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2017.1351370. Epub 2017 Jul 13.
10
Estimated medical cost reductions for paliperidone palmitate vs placebo in a randomized, double-blind relapse-prevention trial of patients with schizoaffective disorder.在一项针对分裂情感性障碍患者的随机、双盲预防复发试验中,棕榈酸帕利哌酮与安慰剂相比预计的医疗成本降低情况。
J Med Econ. 2015;18(8):629-36. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2015.1033424. Epub 2015 Apr 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Revisiting Drug Compliance: The Need for a Holistic Approach in the Treatment of Severe Mental Disorders.重新审视药物依从性:治疗严重精神障碍需要采取整体方法。
Consort Psychiatr. 2021 Nov 5;2(3):17-25. doi: 10.17816/CP93. eCollection 2021.