Gurney-Champion Oliver J, Versteijne Eva, van der Horst Astrid, Lens Eelco, Rütten Heidi, Heerkens Hanne D, Paardekooper Gabriel M R M, Berbee Maaike, Rasch Coen R N, Stoker Jaap, Engelbrecht Marc R W, van Herk Marcel, Nederveen Aart J, Klaassen Remy, van Laarhoven Hanneke W M, van Tienhoven Geertjan, Bel Arjan
a Department of Radiation Oncology, Academic Medical Center , University of Amsterdam , Amsterdam , the Netherlands.
b Department of Radiology, Academic Medical Center , University of Amsterdam , Amsterdam , the Netherlands.
Acta Oncol. 2017 Jul;56(7):923-930. doi: 10.1080/0284186X.2017.1304654. Epub 2017 Apr 4.
To assess the effect of additional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) alongside the planning computed tomography (CT) scan on target volume delineation in pancreatic cancer patients.
Eight observers (radiation oncologists) from six institutions delineated the gross tumor volume (GTV) on 3DCT, and internal GTV (iGTV) on 4DCT of four pancreatic cancer patients, while MRI was available in a second window (CT + MRI). Variations in volume, generalized conformity index (CI), and overall observer variation, expressed as standard deviation (SD) of the distances between delineated surfaces, were analyzed. CI is a measure of overlap of the delineated iGTVs (1 = full overlap, 0 = no overlap). Results were compared with those from an earlier study that assessed the interobserver variation by the same observers on the same patients on CT without MRI (CT-only).
The maximum ratios between delineated volumes within a patient were 6.1 and 22.4 for the GTV (3DCT) and iGTV (4DCT), respectively. The average (root-mean-square) overall observer variations were SD = 0.41 cm (GTV) and SD = 0.73 cm (iGTV). The mean CI was 0.36 for GTV and 0.37 for iGTV. When compared to the iGTV delineated on CT-only, the mean volumes of the iGTV on CT + MRI were significantly smaller (32%, Wilcoxon signed-rank, p < .0005). The median volumes of the iGTV on CT + MRI were included for 97% and 92% in the median volumes of the iGTV on CT. Furthermore, CT + MRI showed smaller overall observer variations (root-mean-square SD = 0.59 cm) in six out of eight delineated structures compared to CT-only (root-mean-square SD = 0.72 cm). However, large local observer variations remained close to biliary stents and pathological lymph nodes, indicating issues with instructions and instruction compliance.
The availability of MRI images during target delineation of pancreatic cancer on 3DCT and 4DCT resulted in smaller target volumes and reduced the interobserver variation in six out of eight delineated structures.
评估在胰腺癌患者的计划计算机断层扫描(CT)基础上增加磁共振成像(MRI)对靶区勾画的影响。
来自六个机构的八名观察者(放射肿瘤学家)在四名胰腺癌患者的三维CT上勾画大体肿瘤体积(GTV),在四维CT上勾画内部GTV(iGTV),同时在第二个窗口中可获取MRI图像(CT + MRI)。分析了体积变化、广义适形指数(CI)以及整体观察者变异,整体观察者变异以勾画表面之间距离的标准差(SD)表示。CI是所勾画iGTV重叠程度的一种度量(1 = 完全重叠,0 = 无重叠)。将结果与早期一项研究的结果进行比较,该研究评估了相同观察者在无MRI的CT(仅CT)上对相同患者的观察者间变异。
患者体内所勾画体积的最大比值,GTV(三维CT)为6.1,iGTV(四维CT)为22.4。整体观察者变异的平均(均方根)值为SD = 0.41 cm(GTV)和SD = 0.73 cm(iGTV)。GTV的平均CI为0.36,iGTV的平均CI为0.37。与仅在CT上勾画的iGTV相比,CT + MRI上iGTV的平均体积显著更小(32%,Wilcoxon符号秩检验,p <.0005)。CT + MRI上iGTV的中位数体积分别有97%和92%包含在CT上iGTV的中位数体积内。此外,与仅CT相比,在八个勾画结构中的六个结构上,CT + MRI显示出更小的整体观察者变异(均方根SD = 0.59 cm)(仅CT的均方根SD = 0.72 cm)。然而,在靠近胆管支架和病理性淋巴结处仍存在较大的局部观察者变异,表明存在指令及指令依从性方面的问题。
在胰腺癌的三维CT和四维CT靶区勾画过程中使用MRI图像可使靶区体积更小,并减少了八个勾画结构中六个结构的观察者间变异。