Seward Kirsty, Wolfenden Luke, Wiggers John, Finch Meghan, Wyse Rebecca, Oldmeadow Christopher, Presseau Justin, Clinton-McHarg Tara, Yoong Sze Lin
Hunter New England Population Health, Wallsend, NSW, 2287, Australia.
School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia.
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2017 Apr 4;14(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s12966-017-0499-6.
While there are number of frameworks which focus on supporting the implementation of evidence based approaches, few psychometrically valid measures exist to assess constructs within these frameworks. This study aimed to develop and psychometrically assess a scale measuring each domain of the Theoretical Domains Framework for use in assessing the implementation of dietary guidelines within a non-health care setting (childcare services).
A 75 item 14-domain Theoretical Domains Framework Questionnaire (TDFQ) was developed and administered via telephone interview to 202 centre based childcare service cooks who had a role in planning the service menu. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was undertaken to assess the reliability, discriminant validity and goodness of fit of the 14-domain theoretical domain framework measure.
For the CFA, five iterative processes of adjustment were undertaken where 14 items were removed, resulting in a final measure consisting of 14 domains and 61 items. For the final measure: the Chi-Square goodness of fit statistic was 3447.19; the Standardized Root Mean Square Residual (SRMR) was 0.070; the Root Mean Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA) was 0.072; and the Comparative Fit Index (CFI) had a value of 0.78.
While only one of the three indices support goodness of fit of the measurement model tested, a 14-domain model with 61 items showed good discriminant validity and internally consistent items. Future research should aim to assess the psychometric properties of the developed TDFQ in other community-based settings.
虽然有许多框架专注于支持循证方法的实施,但用于评估这些框架内构念的心理测量学上有效的测量方法却很少。本研究旨在开发并从心理测量学角度评估一个量表,该量表用于测量理论领域框架的每个领域,以评估在非医疗环境(儿童保育服务)中饮食指南的实施情况。
编制了一份包含75个条目的14领域理论领域框架问卷(TDFQ),并通过电话访谈对202名参与制定服务菜单的中心型儿童保育服务厨师进行了施测。采用验证性因素分析(CFA)来评估14领域理论领域框架测量方法的信度、区分效度和拟合优度。
对于CFA,进行了五个迭代调整过程,共删除了14个条目,最终得到一个由14个领域和61个条目组成的测量方法。对于最终的测量方法:卡方拟合优度统计量为3447.19;标准化根均方残差(SRMR)为0.070;近似根均方误差(RMSEA)为0.