Obuku E A, Lavis J N, Kinengyere A, Mafigiri D K, Sengooba F, Karamagi C, Sewankambo N K
Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, PO Box 7072, Kampala, Uganda.
Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Health Res Policy Syst. 2017 Apr 4;15(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s12961-017-0194-8.
Research is a core business of universities globally, and is crucial in the scientific process as a precursor for knowledge uptake and use. We aimed to assess the academic productivity of post-graduate students in a university located in a low-income country.
This is an observational retrospective documentary analysis using hand searching archives, Google Scholar and PubMed electronic databases. The setting is Makerere University College of Health Sciences, Uganda. Records of post-graduate students (Masters) enrolled from 1996 to 2010, and followed to 2016 for outcomes were analysed. The outcome measures were publications (primary), citations, electronic dissertations found online or conference abstracts (secondary). Descriptive and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed using Stata 14.1.
We found dissertations of 1172 Masters students over the 20-year period of study. While half (590, 50%) had completed clinical graduate disciplines (surgery, internal medicine, paediatrics, obstetrics and gynaecology), Master of Public Health was the single most popular course, with 393 students (31%). Manuscripts from 209 dissertations (18%; 95% CI, 16-20%) were published and approximately the same proportion was cited (196, 17%; 95% CI, 15-19%). Very few (4%) policy-related documents (technical reports and guidelines) cited these dissertations. Variables that remained statistically significant in the multivariable model were students' age at enrolment into the Masters programme (adjusted coefficient -0.12; 95% CI, -0.18 to -0.06; P < 0.001) and type of research design (adjusted coefficient 0.22; 0.03 to 0.40; P = 0.024). Cohort studies were more likely to be published compared to cross-sectional designs (adjusted coefficient 0.78; 95% CI, 0.2 to 1.36; P = 0.008).
The productivity and use of post-graduate students' research conducted at the College of Health Sciences Makerere University is considerably low in terms of peer-reviewed publications and citations in policy-related documents. The need for effective strategies to reverse this 'waste' is urgent if the College, decision-makers, funders and the Ugandan public are to enjoy the 'return on investment' from post-graduate students research.
研究是全球大学的核心业务,在科学进程中作为知识吸收和应用的先导至关重要。我们旨在评估一所位于低收入国家的大学中研究生的学术产出。
这是一项观察性回顾性文献分析,通过手工检索档案、谷歌学术和PubMed电子数据库进行。研究地点是乌干达的马凯雷雷大学健康科学学院。对1996年至2010年入学并追踪至2016年观察结果的研究生(硕士)记录进行分析。结果指标为发表的论文(主要指标)、被引用次数、在线找到的电子论文或会议摘要(次要指标)。使用Stata 14.1进行描述性和多变量逻辑回归分析。
在20年的研究期间,我们找到了1172名硕士研究生的论文。其中一半(590名,50%)完成了临床研究生学科(外科、内科、儿科、妇产科),公共卫生硕士是最受欢迎的单一课程,有393名学生(31%)。209篇论文(18%;95%置信区间,16 - 20%)的手稿得以发表,被引用的比例大致相同(196篇,17%;95%置信区间,15 - 19%)。很少有(4%)与政策相关的文件(技术报告和指南)引用这些论文。在多变量模型中仍具有统计学意义的变量是学生进入硕士项目时的年龄(调整系数 -0.12;95%置信区间,-0.18至 -0.06;P < 0.001)和研究设计类型(调整系数0.22;0.03至0.40;P = 0.024)。与横断面设计相比,队列研究更有可能发表(调整系数0.78;95%置信区间,0.2至1.36;P = 0.008)。
就同行评审的出版物以及政策相关文件中的引用而言,马凯雷雷大学健康科学学院研究生研究的产出率和利用率相当低。如果该学院、决策者、资助者和乌干达公众想要从研究生研究中获得“投资回报”,迫切需要有效的策略来扭转这种“浪费”现象。