From the Departments of Neurology (L.A.B., Y.B.W.E.M.R.) and Radiology (O.A.B., C.B.L.M.M.) and the Clinical Research Unit (M.G.W.D.), Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Departments of Neurology (O.A.B., P.S.S.F., D.W.J.D.), Radiology (O.A.B., A.L.), and Public Health (H.F.L.), Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, and the Departments of Neurology (D.B., R.J.O.) and Radiology (W.H.Z.), Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht - all in the Netherlands.
N Engl J Med. 2017 Apr 6;376(14):1341-1349. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1612136.
Several trials involving patients with acute ischemic stroke have shown better functional outcomes with endovascular treatment than with conventional treatment at 90 days after initiation of treatment. However, results on long-term clinical outcomes are lacking.
We assessed clinical outcomes 2 years after patients were randomly assigned to receive either endovascular treatment (intervention group) or conventional treatment (control group) for acute ischemic stroke. The primary outcome was the score on the modified Rankin scale at 2 years; this scale measures functional outcome, with scores ranging from 0 (no symptoms) to 6 (death). Secondary outcomes included all-cause mortality and the quality of life at 2 years, as measured by means of a health utility index that is based on the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions questionnaire (scores range from -0.329 to 1, with higher scores indicating better health).
Of the 500 patients who underwent randomization in the original trial, 2-year data for this extended follow-up trial were available for 391 patients (78.2%) and information on death was available for 459 patients (91.8%). The distribution of outcomes on the modified Rankin scale favored endovascular treatment over conventional treatment (adjusted common odds ratio, 1.68; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.15 to 2.45; P=0.007). There was no significant difference between the treatment groups in the percentage of patients who had an excellent outcome (i.e., a modified Rankin scale score of 0 or 1). The mean quality-of-life score was 0.48 among patients randomly assigned to endovascular treatment as compared with 0.38 among patients randomly assigned to conventional treatment (mean difference, 0.10; 95% CI, 0.03 to 0.16; P=0.006). The cumulative 2-year mortality rate was 26.0% in the intervention group and 31.0% in the control group (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.9; 95% CI, 0.6 to 1.2; P=0.46).
In this extended follow-up trial, the beneficial effect of endovascular treatment on functional outcome at 2 years in patients with acute ischemic stroke was similar to that reported at 90 days in the original trial. (Funded by the Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development and others; MR CLEAN Current Controlled Trials number, ISRCTN10888758 , and Netherlands Trial Register number, NTR1804 , and MR CLEAN extended follow-up trial Netherlands Trial Register number, NTR5073 .).
几项涉及急性缺血性脑卒中患者的试验表明,与传统治疗相比,血管内治疗在治疗后 90 天具有更好的功能结局。然而,长期临床结局的结果尚缺乏。
我们评估了患者随机分配接受血管内治疗(干预组)或传统治疗(对照组)治疗急性缺血性脑卒中后 2 年的临床结局。主要结局为 2 年时改良 Rankin 量表评分;该量表衡量功能结局,评分范围为 0(无症状)至 6(死亡)。次要结局包括 2 年时的全因死亡率和生活质量,通过基于欧洲生活质量 5 维度问卷的健康效用指数来衡量(评分范围为-0.329 至 1,得分越高表示健康状况越好)。
在原始试验中接受随机分组的 500 例患者中,本扩展随访试验获得了 391 例患者(78.2%)的 2 年数据,以及 459 例患者(91.8%)的死亡信息。改良 Rankin 量表的结局分布有利于血管内治疗而非传统治疗(调整后的常见比值比,1.68;95%置信区间[CI],1.15 至 2.45;P=0.007)。治疗组之间,改良 Rankin 量表评分为 0 或 1 的患者比例无显著差异。随机分配至血管内治疗的患者的平均生活质量评分(0.48)高于随机分配至传统治疗的患者(0.38)(平均差异,0.10;95%CI,0.03 至 0.16;P=0.006)。干预组的 2 年累积死亡率为 26.0%,对照组为 31.0%(调整后的风险比,0.9;95%CI,0.6 至 1.2;P=0.46)。
在这项扩展随访试验中,血管内治疗对急性缺血性脑卒中患者 2 年时功能结局的有益作用与原始试验中 90 天时的报告结果相似。(由荷兰卫生研究与发展组织和其他组织资助;MR CLEAN 当前对照试验编号,ISRCTN10888758,和荷兰试验登记处编号,NTR1804,和 MR CLEAN 扩展随访试验荷兰试验登记处编号,NTR5073)。