• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用实时肿瘤追踪技术对肺肿瘤进行立体定向消融放疗后胸壁毒性的预测因素。

Predictors of chest wall toxicity after stereotactic ablative radiotherapy using real-time tumor tracking for lung tumors.

作者信息

Park Younghee, Kim Hee Jung, Chang Ah Ram

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology/CyberKnife Center, Soonchunhyang University Seoul Hospital, 59 Daesagwan-ro, Yongsan-gu, Seoul, 140-743, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Radiat Oncol. 2017 Apr 5;12(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s13014-017-0803-2.

DOI:10.1186/s13014-017-0803-2
PMID:28381302
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5382431/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the incidence of chest wall toxicity after lung stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) and identify risk factors for the development of rib fracture.

METHODS

Thirty-nine patients with 49 lesions underwent SABR for primary or metastatic lung tumors using Cyberknife® with tumor tracking systems. Patient characteristics, treatment factors and variables obtained from dose-volume histograms (DVHs) were analyzed to find the association with chest wall toxicity. Four-dimensional (4D) dose calculations were done to investigate the effect of respiratory motion on dose to the ribs.

RESULTS

After follow-up of median 26.7 months (range: 8.4 - 80.0), 8 patients (20.5%) experienced rib fractures and among these patients, three (37.5%) had chest wall pain at 2-3 months after SABR. Median time to rib fracture was 13.4 months (range: 8.0 - 38.5) and the 2-year actuarial risk of rib fracture was 12.2%. Dose to the 4.6 cc of the ribs (D) and rib volume received 160 Gy or more (V) were significant predictor for rib fracture. No significant differences between three-dimensional (3D) and 4D dose calculations were found.

CONCLUSIONS

Parameters from DVH are useful in predicting the risk of chest wall toxicity after SABR for lung tumors. Efforts should be made to reduce the risk of the rib fracture after lung SABR.

摘要

背景

评估肺部立体定向消融放疗(SABR)后胸壁毒性的发生率,并确定肋骨骨折发生的危险因素。

方法

39例患者共49个病灶接受了使用带有肿瘤追踪系统的赛博刀®进行的原发性或转移性肺肿瘤SABR治疗。分析患者特征、治疗因素以及从剂量体积直方图(DVH)获得的变量,以寻找与胸壁毒性的关联。进行四维(4D)剂量计算,以研究呼吸运动对肋骨剂量的影响。

结果

中位随访26.7个月(范围:8.4 - 80.0个月)后,8例患者(20.5%)发生肋骨骨折,其中3例(37.5%)在SABR后2 - 3个月出现胸壁疼痛。肋骨骨折的中位时间为13.4个月(范围:8.0 - 38.5个月),2年肋骨骨折精算风险为12.2%。肋骨4.6 cc的剂量(D)和接受160 Gy或更高剂量的肋骨体积(V)是肋骨骨折的显著预测因素。三维(3D)和4D剂量计算之间未发现显著差异。

结论

DVH参数有助于预测肺部肿瘤SABR后胸壁毒性的风险。应努力降低肺部SABR后肋骨骨折的风险。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11de/5382431/2b5528deb157/13014_2017_803_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11de/5382431/c297fabb1ac5/13014_2017_803_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11de/5382431/9eea2eb8707a/13014_2017_803_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11de/5382431/af92d5a196b4/13014_2017_803_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11de/5382431/2b5528deb157/13014_2017_803_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11de/5382431/c297fabb1ac5/13014_2017_803_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11de/5382431/9eea2eb8707a/13014_2017_803_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11de/5382431/af92d5a196b4/13014_2017_803_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11de/5382431/2b5528deb157/13014_2017_803_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Predictors of chest wall toxicity after stereotactic ablative radiotherapy using real-time tumor tracking for lung tumors.使用实时肿瘤追踪技术对肺肿瘤进行立体定向消融放疗后胸壁毒性的预测因素。
Radiat Oncol. 2017 Apr 5;12(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s13014-017-0803-2.
2
Predictors of Chest Wall Toxicity after Lung Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy.肺立体定向消融放疗后胸壁毒性的预测因素
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2016 Jan;28(1):28-35. doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2015.06.009. Epub 2015 Jun 28.
3
Chest wall volume receiving >30 Gy predicts risk of severe pain and/or rib fracture after lung stereotactic body radiotherapy.胸部接受 >30 Gy 剂量的体积预测了肺癌立体定向体放射治疗后出现严重疼痛和/或肋骨骨折的风险。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010 Mar 1;76(3):796-801. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.02.027. Epub 2009 May 8.
4
Incidence and risk factors for chest wall toxicity after risk-adapted stereotactic radiotherapy for early-stage lung cancer.风险适应立体定向放疗治疗早期肺癌后胸壁毒性的发生率及危险因素。
J Thorac Oncol. 2011 Dec;6(12):2052-7. doi: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e3182307e74.
5
Radiation-induced rib fracture after stereotactic body radiotherapy with a total dose of 54-56 Gy given in 9-7 fractions for patients with peripheral lung tumor: impact of maximum dose and fraction size.对于周围型肺肿瘤患者,在立体定向体部放射治疗中给予9至7次分割的总剂量54 - 56 Gy后发生的放射性肋骨骨折:最大剂量和分割剂量大小的影响
Radiat Oncol. 2015 Apr 22;10:99. doi: 10.1186/s13014-015-0406-8.
6
Chest wall toxicity after stereotactic body radiotherapy for malignant lesions of the lung and liver.立体定向体部放疗治疗肺部和肝脏恶性病变后的胸壁毒性。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011 Jul 1;80(3):692-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.03.020. Epub 2011 Feb 1.
7
Chest wall and rib irradiation and toxicities of early-stage lung cancer patients treated with CyberKnife stereotactic body radiotherapy.胸部壁层和肋骨照射以及接受射波刀立体定向体部放射治疗的早期肺癌患者的毒性反应
Future Oncol. 2014 Dec;10(15):2311-7. doi: 10.2217/fon.14.158.
8
Clinical prognostic factors and grading system for rib fracture following stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in patients with peripheral lung tumors.立体定向体部放射治疗(SBRT)治疗周围型肺部肿瘤后肋骨骨折的临床预后因素和分级系统。
Lung Cancer. 2013 Feb;79(2):161-6. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2012.10.011. Epub 2012 Nov 20.
9
Quantitative evaluation of correlation of dose and FDG-PET uptake value with clinical chest wall complications in patients with lung cancer treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy.立体定向体部放射治疗肺癌患者中剂量及氟代脱氧葡萄糖正电子发射断层扫描摄取值与临床胸壁并发症相关性的定量评估
J Xray Sci Technol. 2015;23(6):727-36. doi: 10.3233/XST-150523.
10
Characterization of Chest Wall Toxicity During Long-term Follow Up After Thoracic Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy.胸部立体定向体部放射治疗后长期随访中胸壁毒性的特征。
Pract Radiat Oncol. 2019 May;9(3):e338-e346. doi: 10.1016/j.prro.2019.01.012. Epub 2019 Feb 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Irradiation of Lung Cancer Stem Cells Identifies the Lowest Therapeutic Dose Needed for Tumor Growth Arrest and Mass Reduction .肺癌干细胞的辐照确定了肿瘤生长停滞和体积缩小所需的最低治疗剂量。
Front Oncol. 2022 May 12;12:837400. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.837400. eCollection 2022.
2
Systematic Review of Single-Fraction Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Early Stage Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer and Lung Oligometastases: How to Stop Worrying and Love One and Done.早期非小细胞肺癌和肺寡转移瘤单次分割立体定向体部放射治疗的系统评价:如何不再担忧并爱上单次治疗。
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Feb 3;14(3):790. doi: 10.3390/cancers14030790.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Long-term outcomes of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) with fiducial tracking for inoperable stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).针对无法手术的I期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC),采用基准跟踪的立体定向体部放射治疗(SBRT)的长期结果。
J Radiat Oncol. 2016;5(4):379-387. doi: 10.1007/s13566-016-0273-4. Epub 2016 Aug 20.
2
A cortical thickness and radiation dose mapping approach identifies early thinning of ribs after stereotactic body radiation therapy.一种皮质厚度与辐射剂量映射方法可识别立体定向体部放射治疗后肋骨的早期变薄情况。
Radiother Oncol. 2016 Jun;119(3):449-53. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2016.03.023. Epub 2016 Apr 9.
3
The evolving toxicity profile of SBRT for lung cancer.
立体定向体部放疗治疗肺癌时不断演变的毒性特征。
Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2019 Feb;8(1):48-57. doi: 10.21037/tlcr.2018.10.06.
4
Local Reirradiation of Recurrent Non-small Cell Lung Carcinoma Resulting in Long Disease-free Survival, Although in the Presence of Osteonecrosis.复发性非小细胞肺癌的局部再照射导致长期无病生存,尽管存在骨坏死。
Cureus. 2018 Oct 22;10(10):e3471. doi: 10.7759/cureus.3471.
5
Clinical Results of Mean GTV Dose Optimized Robotic-Guided Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Lung Tumors.平均GTV剂量优化的机器人引导立体定向体部放射治疗肺部肿瘤的临床结果
Front Oncol. 2018 May 17;8:171. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2018.00171. eCollection 2018.
6
Erratum to: Predictors of chest wall toxicity after stereotactic ablative radiotherapy using real-time tumor tracking for lung tumors.《使用实时肿瘤追踪技术对肺癌进行立体定向消融放疗后胸壁毒性的预测因素》勘误
Radiat Oncol. 2017 Jul 21;12(1):121. doi: 10.1186/s13014-017-0857-1.
Dose-Response Model for Chest Wall Tolerance of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy.
立体定向体部放射治疗胸壁耐受性的剂量反应模型
Semin Radiat Oncol. 2016 Apr;26(2):129-34. doi: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2015.11.003. Epub 2015 Dec 22.
4
Predictors of Chest Wall Toxicity after Lung Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy.肺立体定向消融放疗后胸壁毒性的预测因素
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2016 Jan;28(1):28-35. doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2015.06.009. Epub 2015 Jun 28.
5
Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy versus lobectomy for operable stage I non-small-cell lung cancer: a pooled analysis of two randomised trials.立体定向消融放疗与肺叶切除术治疗可手术的Ⅰ期非小细胞肺癌:两项随机试验的汇总分析
Lancet Oncol. 2015 Jun;16(6):630-7. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)70168-3. Epub 2015 May 13.
6
Radiation-induced rib fracture after stereotactic body radiotherapy with a total dose of 54-56 Gy given in 9-7 fractions for patients with peripheral lung tumor: impact of maximum dose and fraction size.对于周围型肺肿瘤患者,在立体定向体部放射治疗中给予9至7次分割的总剂量54 - 56 Gy后发生的放射性肋骨骨折:最大剂量和分割剂量大小的影响
Radiat Oncol. 2015 Apr 22;10:99. doi: 10.1186/s13014-015-0406-8.
7
Predictors and management of chest wall toxicity after lung stereotactic body radiotherapy.肺部立体定向体部放疗后胸壁毒性的预测因子和处理。
Cancer Treat Rev. 2014 Dec;40(10):1215-20. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2014.09.003. Epub 2014 Sep 16.
8
Comparison of 3D and 4D Monte Carlo optimization in robotic tracking stereotactic body radiotherapy of lung cancer.3D与4D蒙特卡罗优化在肺癌机器人跟踪立体定向体部放射治疗中的比较
Strahlenther Onkol. 2015 Feb;191(2):161-71. doi: 10.1007/s00066-014-0747-5. Epub 2014 Sep 20.
9
Stereotactic radiotherapy (SABR) for the treatment of primary non-small cell lung cancer; systematic review and comparison with a surgical cohort.立体定向放疗(SABR)治疗原发性非小细胞肺癌;系统评价及与手术队列比较。
Radiother Oncol. 2013 Oct;109(1):1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2013.09.006. Epub 2013 Oct 12.
10
Experimental evaluations of the accuracy of 3D and 4D planning in robotic tracking stereotactic body radiotherapy for lung cancers.机器人跟踪立体定向体部放射治疗肺癌的 3D 和 4D 计划精度的实验评估。
Med Phys. 2013 Apr;40(4):041712. doi: 10.1118/1.4794505.