• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

动态默认模式网络在不同脑状态下的变化。

Dynamic Default Mode Network across Different Brain States.

机构信息

College of Biomedical Engineering, South-Central University for Nationalities, Wuhan, 430074, China.

Key Laboratory of Biomedical Information Engineering of Education Ministry, Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710049, China.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2017 Apr 6;7:46088. doi: 10.1038/srep46088.

DOI:10.1038/srep46088
PMID:28382944
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5382672/
Abstract

The default mode network (DMN) is a complex dynamic network that is critical for understanding cognitive function. However, whether dynamic topological reconfiguration of the DMN occurs across different brain states, and whether this potential reorganization is associated with prior learning or experience is unclear. To better understand the temporally changing topology of the DMN, we investigated both nodal and global dynamic DMN-topology metrics across different brain states. We found that DMN topology changes over time and those different patterns are associated with different brain states. Further, the nodal and global topological organization can be rebuilt by different brain states. These results indicate that the post-task, resting-state topology of the brain network is dynamically altered as a function of immediately prior cognitive experience, and that these modulated networks are assembled in the subsequent state. Together, these findings suggest that the changing topology of the DMN may play an important role in characterizing brain states.

摘要

默认模式网络(DMN)是一个复杂的动态网络,对于理解认知功能至关重要。然而,DMN 是否会在不同的大脑状态下发生动态拓扑重配置,以及这种潜在的重新组织是否与先前的学习或经验有关尚不清楚。为了更好地理解 DMN 的时间变化拓扑结构,我们研究了不同大脑状态下的节点和全局动态 DMN-拓扑度量。我们发现 DMN 的拓扑结构随时间而变化,这些不同的模式与不同的大脑状态有关。此外,不同的大脑状态可以重建节点和全局拓扑组织。这些结果表明,作为之前认知经验的函数,大脑网络在任务后静息状态的拓扑结构是动态改变的,并且这些调节后的网络在随后的状态中被组装。总之,这些发现表明,DMN 的不断变化的拓扑结构可能在表征大脑状态方面发挥重要作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8802/5382672/a26d3080cf44/srep46088-f9.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8802/5382672/2233164c6c90/srep46088-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8802/5382672/d6428fb76f1a/srep46088-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8802/5382672/cd43d8fb43b5/srep46088-f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8802/5382672/90bd19fa3b79/srep46088-f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8802/5382672/7f9eb0b576f8/srep46088-f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8802/5382672/e24c65177440/srep46088-f6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8802/5382672/86accf6112ed/srep46088-f7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8802/5382672/f4c1b58e8f0f/srep46088-f8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8802/5382672/a26d3080cf44/srep46088-f9.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8802/5382672/2233164c6c90/srep46088-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8802/5382672/d6428fb76f1a/srep46088-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8802/5382672/cd43d8fb43b5/srep46088-f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8802/5382672/90bd19fa3b79/srep46088-f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8802/5382672/7f9eb0b576f8/srep46088-f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8802/5382672/e24c65177440/srep46088-f6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8802/5382672/86accf6112ed/srep46088-f7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8802/5382672/f4c1b58e8f0f/srep46088-f8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8802/5382672/a26d3080cf44/srep46088-f9.jpg

相似文献

1
Dynamic Default Mode Network across Different Brain States.动态默认模式网络在不同脑状态下的变化。
Sci Rep. 2017 Apr 6;7:46088. doi: 10.1038/srep46088.
2
Changes in the brain intrinsic organization in both on-task state and post-task resting state.大脑在任务状态和任务后静息状态下的固有组织变化。
Neuroimage. 2012 Aug 1;62(1):394-407. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.04.051. Epub 2012 May 5.
3
Static and dynamic posterior cingulate cortex nodal topology of default mode network predicts attention task performance.默认模式网络的静态和动态后扣带回皮质节点拓扑结构可预测注意力任务表现。
Brain Imaging Behav. 2016 Mar;10(1):212-25. doi: 10.1007/s11682-015-9384-6.
4
Default Mode Dynamics for Global Functional Integration.全球功能整合的默认模式动力学
J Neurosci. 2015 Nov 18;35(46):15254-62. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2135-15.2015.
5
Principal States of Dynamic Functional Connectivity Reveal the Link Between Resting-State and Task-State Brain: An fMRI Study.动态功能连接的主要状态揭示了静息态和任务态大脑之间的联系:一项 fMRI 研究。
Int J Neural Syst. 2018 Sep;28(7):1850002. doi: 10.1142/S0129065718500028. Epub 2018 Jan 25.
6
Modulation of effective connectivity in the default mode network at rest and during a memory task.静息状态及记忆任务期间默认模式网络中有效连接性的调制。
Brain Connect. 2015 Feb;5(1):60-7. doi: 10.1089/brain.2014.0249. Epub 2014 Dec 29.
7
Brain connectivity during resting state and subsequent working memory task predicts behavioural performance.静息状态和随后的工作记忆任务期间的大脑连通性可预测行为表现。
Cortex. 2012 Oct;48(9):1187-96. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2011.07.006. Epub 2011 Aug 5.
8
Cognitive and default-mode resting state networks: do male and female brains "rest" differently?认知和默认模式静息态网络:男性和女性的大脑“休息”方式是否不同?
Hum Brain Mapp. 2010 Nov;31(11):1713-26. doi: 10.1002/hbm.20968.
9
Involvement of the default mode network under varying levels of cognitive effort.默认模式网络在不同认知努力水平下的参与情况。
Sci Rep. 2022 Apr 15;12(1):6303. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-10289-7.
10
Spontaneous brain activity in the default mode network is sensitive to different resting-state conditions with limited cognitive load.默认模式网络中的自发脑活动对认知负荷有限的不同静息状态条件敏感。
PLoS One. 2009 May 29;4(5):e5743. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0005743.

引用本文的文献

1
Brain network dynamics reflect psychiatric illness status and transdiagnostic symptom profiles across health and disease.脑网络动力学反映了健康与疾病状态下的精神疾病状况及跨诊断症状特征。
bioRxiv. 2025 May 28:2025.05.23.655864. doi: 10.1101/2025.05.23.655864.
2
The Neural Association Between Symptom and Cognition in Major Depressive Disorder: A Network Control Theory Study.重度抑郁症中症状与认知之间的神经关联:一项网络控制理论研究。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2025 Apr 1;46(5):e70198. doi: 10.1002/hbm.70198.
3
Brain-wide dynamic coactivation states code for hand movements in the resting state.

本文引用的文献

1
The Reorganization of Human Brain Networks Modulated by Driving Mental Fatigue.驾驶导致的精神疲劳对人脑网络重组的影响。
IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2017 May;21(3):743-755. doi: 10.1109/JBHI.2016.2544061. Epub 2016 Mar 18.
2
Random matrix theory for analyzing the brain functional network in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.随机矩阵理论分析注意缺陷多动障碍的脑功能网络。
Phys Rev E. 2016 Nov;94(5-1):052411. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.94.052411. Epub 2016 Nov 23.
3
Exploring time- and frequency- dependent functional connectivity and brain networks during deception with single-trial event-related potentials.
全脑动态共激活状态在静息状态下对手部运动进行编码。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025 Mar 18;122(11):e2415508122. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2415508122. Epub 2025 Mar 12.
4
Abnormal brain activation during speech perception and production in children and adults with reading difficulty.有阅读困难的儿童和成人在言语感知和产生过程中的大脑激活异常。
NPJ Sci Learn. 2024 Aug 24;9(1):53. doi: 10.1038/s41539-024-00266-2.
5
Lateral frontoparietal effective connectivity differentiates and predicts state of consciousness in a cohort of patients with traumatic disorders of consciousness.外侧额顶叶有效连接可区分并预测创伤性意识障碍患者队列的意识状态。
PLoS One. 2024 Jul 5;19(7):e0298110. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0298110. eCollection 2024.
6
Chronic pain as an emergent property of a complex system and the potential roles of psychedelic therapies.慢性疼痛作为复杂系统的一种涌现特性以及迷幻疗法的潜在作用。
Front Pain Res (Lausanne). 2024 Apr 19;5:1346053. doi: 10.3389/fpain.2024.1346053. eCollection 2024.
7
Recent-onset and persistent tinnitus: Uncovering the differences in brain activities using resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging technologies.近期发作和持续性耳鸣:运用静息态功能磁共振成像技术揭示大脑活动差异。
Front Neurosci. 2022 Oct 19;16:976095. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2022.976095. eCollection 2022.
8
Spindle-slow oscillation coupling correlates with memory performance and connectivity changes in a hippocampal network after sleep.纺锤波慢波同步与睡眠后海马网络的记忆表现和连接变化相关。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2022 Sep;43(13):3923-3943. doi: 10.1002/hbm.25893. Epub 2022 Apr 30.
9
Reconfiguration of Brain Network Dynamics in Autism Spectrum Disorder Based on Hidden Markov Model.基于隐马尔可夫模型的自闭症谱系障碍脑网络动力学重构
Front Hum Neurosci. 2022 Feb 8;16:774921. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.774921. eCollection 2022.
10
Effect of Phase-Encoding Direction on Gender Differences: A Resting-State Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study.相位编码方向对性别差异的影响:一项静息态功能磁共振成像研究。
Front Neurosci. 2022 Jan 25;15:748080. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2021.748080. eCollection 2021.
运用单试次事件相关电位技术探索欺骗过程中的时频依赖功能连通性和脑网络。
Sci Rep. 2016 Nov 11;6:37065. doi: 10.1038/srep37065.
4
Spectral properties of the temporal evolution of brain network structure.脑网络结构时间演化的光谱特性。
Chaos. 2015 Dec;25(12):123112. doi: 10.1063/1.4937451.
5
Default mode network connectivity during task execution.任务执行期间的默认模式网络连接。
Neuroimage. 2015 Nov 15;122:96-104. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.07.053. Epub 2015 Jul 26.
6
Static and dynamic posterior cingulate cortex nodal topology of default mode network predicts attention task performance.默认模式网络的静态和动态后扣带回皮质节点拓扑结构可预测注意力任务表现。
Brain Imaging Behav. 2016 Mar;10(1):212-25. doi: 10.1007/s11682-015-9384-6.
7
Signature of consciousness in the dynamics of resting-state brain activity.静息态脑活动动力学中的意识特征
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Jan 20;112(3):887-92. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1418031112. Epub 2015 Jan 5.
8
Assessing dynamic brain graphs of time-varying connectivity in fMRI data: application to healthy controls and patients with schizophrenia.评估功能磁共振成像(fMRI)数据中时变连通性的动态脑图谱:应用于健康对照者和精神分裂症患者。
Neuroimage. 2015 Feb 15;107:345-355. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.12.020. Epub 2014 Dec 13.
9
Differential lateralization of hippocampal connectivity reflects features of recent context and ongoing demands: an examination of immediate post-task activity.海马体连接的差异侧化反映了近期情境特征和当前需求:任务后即时活动的研究。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2015 Feb;36(2):519-37. doi: 10.1002/hbm.22644. Epub 2014 Oct 8.
10
What we talk about when we talk about the default mode network.当我们谈论默认模式网络时,我们在谈论什么。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2014 Aug 25;8:619. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00619. eCollection 2014.