Lunetta Christian, Lizio Andrea, Maestri Eleonora, Sansone Valeria Ada, Mora Gabriele, Miller Robert G, Appel Stanley H, Chiò Adriano
NeuroMuscular Omnicentre, Fondazione Serena Onlus, Milano, Italy.
NeuroMuscular Omnicentre, Fondazione Serena Onlus, Milano, Italy2Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
JAMA Neurol. 2017 Jun 1;74(6):660-667. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2016.6179.
Various factors have been proposed as possible candidates associated with the prognosis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS); however, there is still no consensus on which biomarkers are reliable prognostic factors. C-reactive protein (CRP) is a biomarker of the inflammatory response that shows significant prognostic value for several diseases.
To examine the prognostic significance of CRP in ALS.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Patients' serum CRP levels were evaluated from January 1, 2009, to June 30, 2015, in a large cohort of patients with ALS observed by an Italian tertiary multidisciplinary center. Results were replicated in an independent cohort obtained from a population-based registry of patients with ALS. A post hoc analysis was performed of the phase 2 trial of NP001 to determine whether stratification by levels of CRP improves differentiation of responders and nonresponders to the drug.
Serum CRP levels from the first examination were recorded to assess their effect on disease progression and survival.
A total of 394 patients with ALS (168 women and 226 men; mean [SD] age at diagnosis, 60.18 [13.60] years) were observed in a tertiary multidisciplinary center, and the analysis was replicated in an independent cohort of 116 patients with ALS (50 women and 66 men; mean [SD] age at diagnosis, 67.00 [10.74] years) identified through a regional population-based registry. Serum CRP levels in the 394 patients with ALS correlated with severity of functional impairment, as measured by total score on the ALS Functional Rating Scale-Revised, at first evaluation (r = -0.14818; P = .004), and with patient survival (hazard ratio, 1.129; 95% CI, 1.033-1.234; P = .007). Similar results were found in the independent cohort (hazard ratio, 1.044; 95% CI, 1.016-1.056; P ≤ .001). Moreover, a post hoc analysis of the phase 2 trial of NP001 using the same CRP threshold showed that patients with elevated baseline CRP levels receiving the higher dose of NP001 had significantly less functional impairment after the treatment period compared with patients with normal baseline CRP, regardless of whether patients with normal CRP levels received NP001 or placebo (3.00 [3.62] vs -7.31 [6.23]; P = .04).
These findings suggest that patients with ALS and elevated serum CRP levels progress more rapidly than do those with lower CRP levels and that this elevation may reflect a neuroinflammatory state potentially responsive to the immune regulators such as NP001.
多种因素已被提出可能与肌萎缩侧索硬化症(ALS)的预后相关;然而,对于哪些生物标志物是可靠的预后因素仍未达成共识。C反应蛋白(CRP)是炎症反应的生物标志物,对多种疾病具有显著的预后价值。
研究CRP在ALS中的预后意义。
设计、设置和参与者:2009年1月1日至2015年6月30日期间,意大利一家三级多学科中心对一大群ALS患者的血清CRP水平进行了评估。结果在从基于人群的ALS患者登记处获得的独立队列中得到了重复验证。对NP001的2期试验进行了事后分析,以确定根据CRP水平进行分层是否能改善对该药物反应者和无反应者的区分。
记录首次检查时的血清CRP水平,以评估其对疾病进展和生存的影响。
在一家三级多学科中心观察了394例ALS患者(168例女性和226例男性;诊断时的平均[标准差]年龄为60.18[13.60]岁),并在通过地区基于人群的登记处确定的116例ALS独立队列患者(50例女性和66例男性;诊断时的平均[标准差]年龄为67.00[10.74]岁)中重复了该分析。在394例ALS患者中,首次评估时血清CRP水平与功能损害严重程度相关,通过ALS功能评定量表修订版总分衡量(r = -0.14818;P = 0.004),并且与患者生存相关(风险比,1.129;95%置信区间,1.033 - 1.234;P = 0.007)。在独立队列中也发现了类似结果(风险比,1.044;95%置信区间,1.016 - 1.056;P≤0.001)。此外,使用相同CRP阈值对NP001的2期试验进行的事后分析表明,与基线CRP正常的患者相比,基线CRP水平升高且接受较高剂量NP001的患者在治疗期后功能损害明显更少,无论基线CRP正常的患者接受的是NP001还是安慰剂(3.00[3.62]对 -7.31[6.23];P = 应0.04)。
这些发现表明,血清CRP水平升高的ALS患者比CRP水平较低的患者进展更快,并且这种升高可能反映了一种可能对NP001等免疫调节剂有反应的神经炎症状态。