Suppr超能文献

一种区分儿童言语失用症与言语迟缓的诊断标志物:II. 停顿标志物的效度研究。

A Diagnostic Marker to Discriminate Childhood Apraxia of Speech From Speech Delay: II. Validity Studies of the Pause Marker.

作者信息

Shriberg Lawrence D, Strand Edythe A, Fourakis Marios, Jakielski Kathy J, Hall Sheryl D, Karlsson Heather B, Mabie Heather L, McSweeny Jane L, Tilkens Christie M, Wilson David L

机构信息

Waisman Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison.

Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.

出版信息

J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2017 Apr 14;60(4):S1118-S1134. doi: 10.1044/2016_JSLHR-S-15-0297.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of this 2nd article in this supplement is to report validity support findings for the Pause Marker (PM), a proposed single-sign diagnostic marker of childhood apraxia of speech (CAS).

METHOD

PM scores and additional perceptual and acoustic measures were obtained from 296 participants in cohorts with idiopathic and neurogenetic CAS, adult-onset apraxia of speech and primary progressive apraxia of speech, and idiopathic speech delay.

RESULTS

Adjusted for questionable specificity disagreements with a pediatric Mayo Clinic diagnostic standard, the estimated sensitivity and specificity, respectively, of the PM were 86.8% and 100% for the CAS cohort, yielding positive and negative likelihood ratios of 56.45 (95% confidence interval [CI]: [1.15, 2763.31]) and 0.13 (95% CI [0.06, 0.30]). Specificity of the PM for 4 cohorts totaling 205 participants with speech delay was 98.5%.

CONCLUSION

These findings are interpreted as providing support for the PM as a near-conclusive diagnostic marker of CAS.

摘要

目的

本增刊中第二篇文章的目的是报告停顿标记(PM)的效度支持结果,PM是一种针对儿童言语失用症(CAS)提议的单信号诊断标记。

方法

从患有特发性和神经遗传性CAS、成人起病的言语失用症和原发性进行性言语失用症以及特发性言语延迟的队列中的296名参与者处获取PM分数以及其他感知和声学测量数据。

结果

针对与梅奥诊所儿科诊断标准存在可疑特异性分歧进行调整后,CAS队列中PM的估计敏感性和特异性分别为86.8%和100%,阳性似然比和阴性似然比分别为56.45(95%置信区间[CI]:[1.15, 2763.31])和0.13(95%CI [0.06, 0.30])。PM对总计205名有言语延迟参与者的4个队列的特异性为98.5%。

结论

这些结果被解释为支持PM作为CAS的近乎决定性诊断标记。

相似文献

1
A Diagnostic Marker to Discriminate Childhood Apraxia of Speech From Speech Delay: II. Validity Studies of the Pause Marker.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2017 Apr 14;60(4):S1118-S1134. doi: 10.1044/2016_JSLHR-S-15-0297.
3
A Diagnostic Marker to Discriminate Childhood Apraxia of Speech From Speech Delay: IV. The Pause Marker Index.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2017 Apr 14;60(4):S1153-S1169. doi: 10.1044/2016_JSLHR-S-16-0149.
4
5
A Diagnostic Marker to Discriminate Childhood Apraxia of Speech From Speech Delay: Introduction.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2017 Apr 14;60(4):S1094-S1095. doi: 10.1044/2016_JSLHR-S-16-0148.
6
Estimates of the prevalence of motor speech disorders in children with idiopathic speech delay.
Clin Linguist Phon. 2019;33(8):679-706. doi: 10.1080/02699206.2019.1595731. Epub 2019 Apr 15.
7
Developmental apraxia of speech: I. Descriptive and theoretical perspectives.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1997 Apr;40(2):273-85. doi: 10.1044/jslhr.4002.273.
8
The hypothesis of apraxia of speech in children with autism spectrum disorder.
J Autism Dev Disord. 2011 Apr;41(4):405-26. doi: 10.1007/s10803-010-1117-5.
9
A motor speech assessment for children with severe speech disorders: reliability and validity evidence.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2013 Apr;56(2):505-20. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2012/12-0094). Epub 2012 Dec 28.
10
Childhood apraxia of speech and multiple phonological disorders in Cairo-Egyptian Arabic speaking children: language, speech, and oro-motor differences.
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2010 Jun;74(6):578-85. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2010.02.003. Epub 2010 Mar 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Review of methods for conducting speech research with minimally verbal individuals with autism spectrum disorder.
Augment Altern Commun. 2023 Mar;39(1):33-44. doi: 10.1080/07434618.2022.2120071. Epub 2022 Nov 8.
3
The importance of deep speech phenotyping for neurodevelopmental and genetic disorders: a conceptual review.
J Neurodev Disord. 2022 Jun 11;14(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s11689-022-09443-z.
4
Differences Between School-Aged Children with Apraxia of Speech and Other Speech Sound Disorders on Multisyllable Repetition.
Perspect ASHA Spec Interest Groups. 2020 Aug 17;5(4):794-808. doi: 10.1044/2020_persp-19-00086. Epub 2020 May 20.
5
Concurrent Validity Between Two Sound Sequencing Tasks Used to Identify Childhood Apraxia of Speech in School-Age Children.
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2021 Jun 18;30(3S):1580-1588. doi: 10.1044/2020_AJSLP-20-00108. Epub 2021 Mar 8.
6
Factor analysis of signs of childhood apraxia of speech.
J Commun Disord. 2020 Sep-Oct;87:106033. doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2020.106033. Epub 2020 Aug 18.
7
Differential Diagnosis of Apraxia of Speech in Children and Adults: A Scoping Review.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2020 Sep 15;63(9):2952-2994. doi: 10.1044/2020_JSLHR-20-00061. Epub 2020 Aug 12.
9
Estimates of the Prevalence of Speech and Motor Speech Disorders in Youth With 22q11.2 Deletion Syndrome.
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2019 Feb 21;28(1):53-82. doi: 10.1044/2018_AJSLP-18-0037.
10
Changes in movement transitions across a practice period in childhood apraxia of speech.
Clin Linguist Phon. 2018;32(7):661-687. doi: 10.1080/02699206.2017.1419378. Epub 2017 Dec 27.

本文引用的文献

2
4
A Diagnostic Marker to Discriminate Childhood Apraxia of Speech From Speech Delay: Introduction.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2017 Apr 14;60(4):S1094-S1095. doi: 10.1044/2016_JSLHR-S-16-0148.
5
A Diagnostic Marker to Discriminate Childhood Apraxia of Speech From Speech Delay: IV. The Pause Marker Index.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2017 Apr 14;60(4):S1153-S1169. doi: 10.1044/2016_JSLHR-S-16-0149.
6
Primary progressive apraxia of speech: clinical features and acoustic and neurologic correlates.
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2015 May;24(2):88-100. doi: 10.1044/2015_AJSLP-14-0174.
7
The diagnosis and understanding of apraxia of speech: why including neurodegenerative etiologies may be important.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2012 Oct;55(5):S1518-22. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2012/11-0309).
8
Characterizing a neurodegenerative syndrome: primary progressive apraxia of speech.
Brain. 2012 May;135(Pt 5):1522-36. doi: 10.1093/brain/aws032. Epub 2012 Mar 1.
9
Prevalence and phenotype of childhood apraxia of speech in youth with galactosemia.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2011 Apr;54(2):487-519. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2010/10-0068). Epub 2010 Oct 21.
10
Perceptual and acoustic reliability estimates for the Speech Disorders Classification System (SDCS).
Clin Linguist Phon. 2010 Oct;24(10):825-46. doi: 10.3109/02699206.2010.503007.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验