Shriberg Lawrence D, Strand Edythe A, Fourakis Marios, Jakielski Kathy J, Hall Sheryl D, Karlsson Heather B, Mabie Heather L, McSweeny Jane L, Tilkens Christie M, Wilson David L
Waisman Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic-Rochester, NY.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2017 Apr 14;60(4):S1135-S1152. doi: 10.1044/2016_JSLHR-S-15-0298.
Previous articles in this supplement described rationale for and development of the pause marker (PM), a diagnostic marker of childhood apraxia of speech (CAS), and studies supporting its validity and reliability. The present article assesses the theoretical coherence of the PM with speech processing deficits in CAS.
PM and other scores were obtained for 264 participants in 6 groups: CAS in idiopathic, neurogenetic, and complex neurodevelopmental disorders; adult-onset apraxia of speech (AAS) consequent to stroke and primary progressive apraxia of speech; and idiopathic speech delay.
Participants with CAS and AAS had significantly lower scores than typically speaking reference participants and speech delay controls on measures posited to assess representational and transcoding processes. Representational deficits differed between CAS and AAS groups, with support for both underspecified linguistic representations and memory/access deficits in CAS, but for only the latter in AAS. CAS-AAS similarities in the age-sex standardized percentages of occurrence of the most frequent type of inappropriate pauses (abrupt) and significant differences in the standardized occurrence of appropriate pauses were consistent with speech processing findings.
Results support the hypotheses of core representational and transcoding speech processing deficits in CAS and theoretical coherence of the PM's pause-speech elements with these deficits.
本增刊之前的文章描述了停顿标记(PM)的理论依据、开发过程,它是儿童言语失用症(CAS)的一种诊断标记,以及支持其有效性和可靠性的研究。本文评估了PM与CAS言语处理缺陷的理论一致性。
为6组共264名参与者获取了PM和其他分数,这6组分别为:特发性、神经遗传性和复杂性神经发育障碍中的CAS;中风后成人获得性言语失用症(AAS)和原发性进行性言语失用症;以及特发性言语延迟。
在假定用于评估表征和转码过程的测量中,患有CAS和AAS的参与者得分显著低于正常言语的对照参与者和言语延迟对照组。CAS组和AAS组的表征缺陷有所不同,CAS组存在语言表征不明确和记忆/提取缺陷的证据,而AAS组仅存在后者。CAS和AAS在最常见的不适当停顿类型(突然停顿)的年龄 - 性别标准化发生率上的相似性,以及适当停顿标准化发生率的显著差异,与言语处理结果一致。
结果支持了CAS中存在核心表征和转码言语处理缺陷的假设,以及PM的停顿 - 言语元素与这些缺陷的理论一致性。