• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Combined Conventional and Endoscopic Microdebrider-Assisted Adenoidectomy: A Tertiary Centre Experience.传统与内镜下微型切割器辅助腺样体切除术联合应用:三级医疗中心经验
J Clin Diagn Res. 2017 Feb;11(2):MC05-MC07. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2017/24682.9394. Epub 2017 Feb 1.
2
How we do it: a combined method of traditional curette and power-assisted endoscopic adenoidectomy.我们的做法:传统刮匙与电动辅助内镜下腺样体切除术相结合的方法。
Acta Otolaryngol. 2009 May;129(5):556-9. doi: 10.1080/00016480802294377.
3
Comparative Study Between Conventional Curettage Adenoidectomy Versus Endoscopic Microdebrider Assisted Adenoidectomy: Our Experience.传统刮除腺样体切除术与内镜下微型切割器辅助腺样体切除术的比较研究:我们的经验
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022 Oct;74(Suppl 2):875-880. doi: 10.1007/s12070-020-01944-4. Epub 2020 Jul 9.
4
Endoscopic Assisted Cold Steel adenoidectomy - A Cost Effective Modification for Better Outcome.内镜辅助冷器械腺样体切除术——一种经济有效的改良方法以获得更好的效果
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2023 Dec;75(4):3211-3215. doi: 10.1007/s12070-023-03979-9. Epub 2023 Jun 16.
5
Comparison of transnasal and transoral routes of microdebrider combined curettage adenoidectomy and assessment of endoscopy for residue: a randomized prospective study.经鼻与经口微动力系统联合腺样体切除术切除残留的对比:一项随机前瞻性研究。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2021 Mar;278(3):797-805. doi: 10.1007/s00405-020-06385-x. Epub 2020 Sep 28.
6
Endoscopic assisted powered adenoidectomy versus conventional adenoidectomy - a randomised controlled trial.内镜辅助动力腺样体切除术与传统腺样体切除术的随机对照试验
J Laryngol Otol. 2019 Apr;133(4):289-293. doi: 10.1017/S0022215119000550.
7
A comparative study of two adenoidectomy technics for efficacy and safety: Conventional curettage adenoidectomy versus endoscopic microdebrider adenoidectomy.两种腺样体切除术技术的疗效和安全性比较研究:传统刮除腺样体切除术与内镜下微动力系统切除术的比较。
Am J Otolaryngol. 2023 Jul-Aug;44(4):103807. doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2023.103807. Epub 2023 Mar 9.
8
Comparison between curettage adenoidectomy and endoscopic-assisted microdebrider adenoidectomy in terms of Eustachian tube dysfunction.经比较,腺样体刮除术与内镜辅助微动力切割术治疗咽鼓管功能障碍的疗效。
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2020 Jan-Feb;86(1):38-43. doi: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2018.08.004. Epub 2018 Sep 25.
9
Comparative analysis of conventional cold curettage versus endoscopic assisted coblation adenoidectomy.传统冷刮除术与内镜辅助低温等离子腺样体切除术的对比分析
J Laryngol Otol. 2019 Apr;133(4):294-299. doi: 10.1017/S0022215119000227. Epub 2019 Mar 19.
10
Assessment of middle ear function after conventional or endoscopic microdebrider assisted adenoidectomy.评估传统或内镜下微动力辅助腺样体切除术对中耳功能的影响。
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2023 Dec;43(6):417-423. doi: 10.14639/0392-100X-N2593. Epub 2023 Oct 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Adenoidectomy: Anatomical Versus Clinical Success.腺样体切除术:解剖学成功与临床成功
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2023 Dec;75(4):3481-3486. doi: 10.1007/s12070-023-03992-y. Epub 2023 Jun 30.
2
Adverse events of coblation or microdebrider in pediatric adenoidectomy: A retrospective analysis in 468 patients.小儿腺样体切除术使用低温等离子消融术或微型切割器的不良事件:468例患者的回顾性分析
Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2022 Oct 13;7(6):2154-2160. doi: 10.1002/lio2.949. eCollection 2022 Dec.
3
Comparison of Conventional Curettage Adenoidectomy Versus Endoscopic Powered Adenoidectomy: A Randomised Single-Blind Study.传统刮除腺样体切除术与内镜动力腺样体切除术的比较:一项随机单盲研究。
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022 Oct;74(Suppl 2):1044-1049. doi: 10.1007/s12070-020-02122-2. Epub 2020 Sep 2.
4
Adenoidectomy in Children: What Is the Evidence and What Is its Role?儿童腺样体切除术:证据是什么,其作用又是什么?
Curr Otorhinolaryngol Rep. 2018;6(1):64-73. doi: 10.1007/s40136-018-0190-8. Epub 2018 Mar 2.

本文引用的文献

1
Adenoidectomy as an adjuvant to primary tympanostomy tube placement: a systematic review and meta-analysis.腺样体切除术作为鼓室置管术的辅助治疗:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014 Feb;140(2):95-101. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2013.5842.
2
Endoscopic adenoidectomy with microdebrider.使用微型切割器的内镜下腺样体切除术。
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2010 Oct;62(4):427-31. doi: 10.1007/s12070-011-0118-9. Epub 2011 Jan 11.
3
Endoscopic nasopharyngeal exploration at the end of conventional curettage adenoidectomy.经传统腺样体切除术刮除术末端行内镜鼻咽探查。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2012 Mar;269(3):1037-40. doi: 10.1007/s00405-011-1739-z. Epub 2011 Aug 11.
4
Endoscopic-assisted versus curettage adenoidectomy: a prospective, randomized, double-blind study with objective outcome measures.内镜辅助与刮除腺样体切除术的比较:一项前瞻性、随机、双盲研究,具有客观的结局指标。
Laryngoscope. 2010 Sep;120(9):1895-9. doi: 10.1002/lary.21045.
5
How we do it: a combined method of traditional curette and power-assisted endoscopic adenoidectomy.我们的做法:传统刮匙与电动辅助内镜下腺样体切除术相结合的方法。
Acta Otolaryngol. 2009 May;129(5):556-9. doi: 10.1080/00016480802294377.
6
Videoendoscopic adenoidectomy with microdebrider.使用微型切割器的视频内镜腺样体切除术。
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2008 Feb;28(1):26-9.
7
Power-assisted adenoidectomy: total and partial resection.动力辅助腺样体切除术:全切除和部分切除
Laryngoscope. 2002 Aug;112(8 Pt 2 Suppl 100):29-31. doi: 10.1097/00005537-200208001-00011.
8
Obstructive adenoid tissue: an indication for powered-shaver adenoidectomy.阻塞性腺样体组织:电动剃须刀腺样体切除术的一个指征
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2002 Jul;128(7):789-91. doi: 10.1001/archotol.128.7.789.
9
Comparison of power-assisted adenoidectomy vs adenoid curette adenoidectomy.动力辅助腺样体切除术与腺样体刮除术的比较。
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2000 Jul;126(7):845-9. doi: 10.1001/archotol.126.7.845.
10
Endoscopic-assisted adenoidectomy.内镜辅助腺样体切除术
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1999 Dec;121(6):740-4. doi: 10.1053/hn.1999.v121.a98201.

传统与内镜下微型切割器辅助腺样体切除术联合应用:三级医疗中心经验

Combined Conventional and Endoscopic Microdebrider-Assisted Adenoidectomy: A Tertiary Centre Experience.

作者信息

Das Amal T, Prakash S B, Priyadarshini V

机构信息

Assistant Professor, Department of ENT and HNS, DM Wayanad Institute of Medical Sciences , Wayanad, Kerala, India .

Associate Professor, Department of ENT and HNS, DM Wayanad Institute of Medical Sciences , Wayanad, Kerala, India .

出版信息

J Clin Diagn Res. 2017 Feb;11(2):MC05-MC07. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2017/24682.9394. Epub 2017 Feb 1.

DOI:10.7860/JCDR/2017/24682.9394
PMID:28384895
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5376862/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Adenoidectomy is one of the most commonly performed surgical procedures in children. Conventional adenoidectomy is associated with incomplete adenoid tissue removal with persistence of symptoms. The advent of rigid nasal endoscopes, cold light source, fiber optics and powered instruments used in functional endoscopic sinus surgery helped in the development of endoscopic microdebrider-assisted adenoidectomy.

AIM

To establish the safety and efficacy of combined conventional and endoscopic microdebrider-assisted adenoidectomy procedure.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a prospective study of 60 child patients who underwent combined conventional and endoscopic microdebrider-assisted adenoidectomy. The study was conducted from September 2013 to September 2015. Only child patients with grade 3 and grade 4 Adenoid Hypertrophy (AH) was included in the study. At the end of conventional adenoidectomy and after combined procedure, the AH was graded again. Post-operative complications like neck pain, hypernasality and swallowing problems were noted. Their symptom score was reviewed before surgery and after one month and one year of surgery. The duration of surgery and amount of blood loss was recorded.

RESULTS

By this technique, complete clearance of adenoid tissue was obtained in all 60 (100%) cases. The mean pre-operative symptom score for AH was 3.7, which improved to 0 after one month of combined conventional and endoscopic microdebrider-assisted adenoidectomy. All child patients were symptom-free at the end of one month and one year. The duration of conventional adenoidectomy was 5 minutes 12 seconds while total duration of the combined conventional and endoscopic microdebrider-assisted adenoidectomy was 14 minutes 45 seconds. There was no significant blood loss (15±3 ml approximately). There were no major complications in this study.

CONCLUSION

The combined approach of conventional curette along with endoscopic microdebrider-assisted adenoidectomy is a safe and effective method for complete and accurate removal of large adenoids.

摘要

引言

腺样体切除术是儿童最常施行的外科手术之一。传统腺样体切除术与腺样体组织切除不完全及症状持续存在有关。功能性鼻内镜鼻窦手术中使用的硬性鼻内镜、冷光源、纤维光学和动力器械的出现,推动了内镜下微切割吸引器辅助腺样体切除术的发展。

目的

确定传统与内镜下微切割吸引器辅助腺样体切除术联合应用的安全性和有效性。

材料与方法

这是一项对60例接受传统与内镜下微切割吸引器辅助腺样体切除术联合手术的儿童患者的前瞻性研究。研究于2013年9月至2015年9月进行。仅纳入3级和4级腺样体肥大(AH)的儿童患者。在传统腺样体切除术后及联合手术后,再次对腺样体肥大进行分级。记录术后并发症,如颈部疼痛、鼻音过重和吞咽问题。在手术前以及术后1个月和1年对其症状评分进行复查。记录手术时间和失血量。

结果

通过该技术,所有60例(100%)患者的腺样体组织均被完全清除。腺样体肥大术前平均症状评分为3.7,在传统与内镜下微切割吸引器辅助腺样体切除术联合手术后1个月降至0。所有儿童患者在1个月和1年时均无症状。传统腺样体切除术的时间为5分12秒,而传统与内镜下微切割吸引器辅助腺样体切除术联合手术的总时间为14分45秒。失血量无显著差异(约15±3 ml)。本研究中无重大并发症。

结论

传统刮匙与内镜下微切割吸引器辅助腺样体切除术联合应用是一种安全有效的方法,可完整、准确地切除大型腺样体。