• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对多重机构隶属关系的初步审视:一项针对德国、日本和英国作者的研究。

A first look at multiple institutional affiliations: a study of authors in Germany, Japan and the UK.

作者信息

Hottenrott Hanna, Lawson Cornelia

机构信息

TUM School of Management, Technische Universität München, Arcisstraße 21, 80333 Munich, Germany.

Centre for European Economic Research (ZEW), Mannheim, Germany.

出版信息

Scientometrics. 2017;111(1):285-295. doi: 10.1007/s11192-017-2257-6. Epub 2017 Jan 28.

DOI:10.1007/s11192-017-2257-6
PMID:28386152
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5362650/
Abstract

This study sheds light on the unexplored phenomenon of multiple institutional affiliations using scientific publications. Institutional affiliations are important in the organisation and governance of science. Multiple affiliations may alter the traditional framework of academic employment and careers and may require a reappraisal of institutional assessment based on research outcomes of affiliated staff. Results for authors in three major science and technology nations (Germany, Japan and the UK) and in three fields (biology, chemistry, and engineering) show that multiple affiliations have at least doubled over the past few years. The analysis proposes three major types of multiple affiliations that depend on the structure of the research sector and its international openness. Highly internationalised and higher education-centred affiliations are most common for researchers in the UK whereas Germany and Japan have stronger cross-sector affiliation patterns. International multiple affiliations are, however, still more common in Germany compared to Japan which is characterised by a domestic, cross-sector affiliation distribution. Moreover, multiple affiliation authors are more often found on high impact papers, particularly in the case of authors from Japan and Germany in the fields of biology and chemistry.

摘要

本研究通过科学出版物揭示了多重机构隶属关系这一未被探索的现象。机构隶属关系在科学的组织和管理中很重要。多重隶属关系可能会改变学术就业和职业的传统框架,可能需要根据附属人员的研究成果对机构评估进行重新审视。对三个主要科技国家(德国、日本和英国)以及三个领域(生物学、化学和工程学)的作者的研究结果表明,在过去几年中,多重隶属关系至少增加了一倍。该分析提出了三种主要的多重隶属关系类型,这取决于研究部门的结构及其国际开放程度。高度国际化且以高等教育为中心的隶属关系在英国研究人员中最为常见,而德国和日本则有更强的跨部门隶属关系模式。然而,与以国内跨部门隶属关系分布为特征的日本相比,德国的国际多重隶属关系仍然更为常见。此外,在高影响力论文上更常发现有多重隶属关系的作者,特别是在生物学和化学领域的日本和德国作者的情况下。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d96/5362650/9691aa57e7e0/11192_2017_2257_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d96/5362650/c890077204b9/11192_2017_2257_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d96/5362650/a05b2feaeb3d/11192_2017_2257_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d96/5362650/9691aa57e7e0/11192_2017_2257_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d96/5362650/c890077204b9/11192_2017_2257_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d96/5362650/a05b2feaeb3d/11192_2017_2257_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d96/5362650/9691aa57e7e0/11192_2017_2257_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
A first look at multiple institutional affiliations: a study of authors in Germany, Japan and the UK.对多重机构隶属关系的初步审视:一项针对德国、日本和英国作者的研究。
Scientometrics. 2017;111(1):285-295. doi: 10.1007/s11192-017-2257-6. Epub 2017 Jan 28.
2
Plurality in multi-disciplinary research: multiple institutional affiliations are associated with increased citations.多学科研究中的多元性:多个机构附属关系与引用次数增加相关。
PeerJ. 2018 Sep 24;6:e5664. doi: 10.7717/peerj.5664. eCollection 2018.
3
Author misrepresentation of institutional affiliations: protocol for an exploratory case study.作者单位关系不当的描述:一项探索性案例研究的方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 Feb 22;9(2):e023983. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023983.
4
Scientific collaboration of Cuban researchers working in Europe: understanding relations between origin and destination countries.在欧洲工作的古巴研究人员的科学合作:理解原籍国与目的地国之间的关系。
Scientometrics. 2018;117(2):745-769. doi: 10.1007/s11192-018-2888-2. Epub 2018 Aug 20.
5
A spatial-institutional analysis of researchers with multiple affiliations.多机构任职研究人员的空间-制度分析。
PLoS One. 2021 Jun 29;16(6):e0253462. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253462. eCollection 2021.
6
Using Co-authorship Networks to Map and Analyse Global Neglected Tropical Disease Research with an Affiliation to Germany.利用共同作者网络绘制和分析与德国有关联的全球被忽视热带病研究。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2015 Dec 31;9(12):e0004182. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0004182. eCollection 2015 Dec.
7
International collaboration of clinical medicine research in Taiwan, 1990-2004: a bibliometric analysis.1990 - 2004年台湾临床医学研究的国际合作:文献计量分析
J Chin Med Assoc. 2007 Mar;70(3):110-6. doi: 10.1016/S1726-4901(09)70340-5.
8
A descriptive analysis of the Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics, 1989-1996.《手法与生理治疗杂志》1989 - 1996年的描述性分析
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1998 Oct;21(8):539-52.
9
Knowledge creation through collaboration: The role of shared institutional affiliations and physical proximity.通过合作实现知识创造:共享机构隶属关系和物理距离的作用。
J Assoc Inf Sci Technol. 2021 Nov;72(11):1337-1353. doi: 10.1002/asi.24491. Epub 2021 May 22.
10
Synchronous international scientific mobility in the space of affiliations: evidence from Russia.机构空间中的同步国际科学流动:来自俄罗斯的证据。
Springerplus. 2016 Apr 19;5:480. doi: 10.1186/s40064-016-2127-3. eCollection 2016.

引用本文的文献

1
Patterns of collaboration and knowledge generated by an Australian rural research centre over 20 years: a co-authorship network analysis.澳大利亚农村研究中心 20 多年来的合作模式和知识成果:合著网络分析。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2023 Aug 30;21(1):87. doi: 10.1186/s12961-023-01029-y.
2
Institution Origin and Medical School Rank Impact the Citation Frequency and Publication Rate in Orthopaedic Sports Medicine Journals.机构来源和医学院校排名对骨科运动医学期刊的引用频率和发表率有影响。
Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2022 Feb 8;4(2):e295-e300. doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2021.09.005. eCollection 2022 Apr.
3
A spatial-institutional analysis of researchers with multiple affiliations.

本文引用的文献

1
Citation impact. Saudi universities offer cash in exchange for academic prestige.引用影响力。沙特的大学用现金换取学术声誉。
Science. 2011 Dec 9;334(6061):1344-5. doi: 10.1126/science.334.6061.1344.
2
Multi-university research teams: shifting impact, geography, and stratification in science.多所大学联合研究团队:科学领域中影响力、地域及分层的转变
Science. 2008 Nov 21;322(5905):1259-62. doi: 10.1126/science.1158357. Epub 2008 Oct 9.
3
The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge.团队在知识生产中日益占据主导地位。
多机构任职研究人员的空间-制度分析。
PLoS One. 2021 Jun 29;16(6):e0253462. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253462. eCollection 2021.
4
Collaboration and knowledge generation in an 18-year quality improvement research programme in Australian Indigenous primary healthcare: a coauthorship network analysis.协作与知识生成在澳大利亚原住民初级医疗保健 18 年质量改进研究计划中:合著网络分析。
BMJ Open. 2021 May 6;11(5):e045101. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045101.
5
Scientific Publications in Dentistry in Lithuania, Latvia, and Estonia Between 1996 and 2018: A Bibliometric Analysis.立陶宛、拉脱维亚和爱沙尼亚的牙科领域科学出版物 1996-2018 年:文献计量分析。
Med Sci Monit. 2019 Jun 14;25:4414-4422. doi: 10.12659/MSM.914223.
6
Author misrepresentation of institutional affiliations: protocol for an exploratory case study.作者单位关系不当的描述:一项探索性案例研究的方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 Feb 22;9(2):e023983. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023983.
7
Plurality in multi-disciplinary research: multiple institutional affiliations are associated with increased citations.多学科研究中的多元性:多个机构附属关系与引用次数增加相关。
PeerJ. 2018 Sep 24;6:e5664. doi: 10.7717/peerj.5664. eCollection 2018.
Science. 2007 May 18;316(5827):1036-9. doi: 10.1126/science.1136099. Epub 2007 Apr 12.
4
Scientific workforce. Frustrations mount over China's high-priced hunt for trophy professors.科研人才队伍。中国高价招揽顶尖教授之举引发越来越多不满。
Science. 2006 Sep 22;313(5794):1721-3. doi: 10.1126/science.313.5794.1721.