• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

微创与开放远端胰腺切除术(LEOPARD):一项随机对照试验的研究方案

Minimally invasive versus open distal pancreatectomy (LEOPARD): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

de Rooij Thijs, van Hilst Jony, Vogel Jantien A, van Santvoort Hjalmar C, de Boer Marieke T, Boerma Djamila, van den Boezem Peter B, Bonsing Bert A, Bosscha Koop, Coene Peter-Paul, Daams Freek, van Dam Ronald M, Dijkgraaf Marcel G, van Eijck Casper H, Festen Sebastiaan, Gerhards Michael F, Groot Koerkamp Bas, Hagendoorn Jeroen, van der Harst Erwin, de Hingh Ignace H, Dejong Cees H, Kazemier Geert, Klaase Joost, de Kleine Ruben H, van Laarhoven Cornelis J, Lips Daan J, Luyer Misha D, Molenaar I Quintus, Nieuwenhuijs Vincent B, Patijn Gijs A, Roos Daphne, Scheepers Joris J, van der Schelling George P, Steenvoorde Pascal, Swijnenburg Rutger-Jan, Wijsman Jan H, Abu Hilal Moh'd, Busch Olivier R, Besselink Marc G

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, PO Box 22660, Amsterdam, AZ 1105, The Netherlands.

Department of Surgery, St Antonius Hospital, PO Box 2500, Nieuwegein, EM 3430, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Trials. 2017 Apr 8;18(1):166. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-1892-9.

DOI:10.1186/s13063-017-1892-9
PMID:28388963
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5385082/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Observational cohort studies have suggested that minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy (MIDP) is associated with better short-term outcomes compared with open distal pancreatectomy (ODP), such as less intraoperative blood loss, lower morbidity, shorter length of hospital stay, and reduced total costs. Confounding by indication has probably influenced these findings, given that case-matched studies failed to confirm the superiority of MIDP. This accentuates the need for multicenter randomized controlled trials, which are currently lacking. We hypothesize that time to functional recovery is shorter after MIDP compared with ODP even in an enhanced recovery setting.

METHODS

LEOPARD is a randomized controlled, parallel-group, patient-blinded, multicenter, superiority trial in all 17 centers of the Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Group. A total of 102 patients with symptomatic benign, premalignant or malignant disease will be randomly allocated to undergo MIDP or ODP in an enhanced recovery setting. The primary outcome is time (days) to functional recovery, defined as all of the following: independently mobile at the preoperative level, sufficient pain control with oral medication alone, ability to maintain sufficient (i.e. >50%) daily required caloric intake, no intravenous fluid administration and no signs of infection. Secondary outcomes are operative and postoperative outcomes, including clinically relevant complications, mortality, quality of life and costs.

DISCUSSION

The LEOPARD trial is designed to investigate whether MIDP reduces the time to functional recovery compared with ODP in an enhanced recovery setting.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Dutch Trial Register, NTR5188 . Registered on 9 April 2015.

摘要

背景

观察性队列研究表明,与开放性远端胰腺切除术(ODP)相比,微创远端胰腺切除术(MIDP)具有更好的短期预后,如术中失血更少、发病率更低、住院时间更短以及总成本降低。鉴于病例匹配研究未能证实MIDP的优越性,适应证的混杂因素可能影响了这些结果。这凸显了目前缺乏的多中心随机对照试验的必要性。我们假设,即使在强化康复环境下,MIDP后功能恢复的时间也比ODP短。

方法

LEOPARD是一项在荷兰胰腺癌研究组的所有17个中心进行的随机对照、平行组、患者盲法、多中心优效性试验。总共102例有症状的良性、癌前或恶性疾病患者将被随机分配在强化康复环境下接受MIDP或ODP。主要结局是功能恢复的时间(天),定义如下:在术前水平独立活动、仅用口服药物即可充分控制疼痛、能够维持足够(即>50%)的每日所需热量摄入、无需静脉输液且无感染迹象。次要结局是手术和术后结局,包括临床相关并发症、死亡率、生活质量和成本。

讨论

LEOPARD试验旨在研究在强化康复环境下,与ODP相比,MIDP是否能缩短功能恢复时间。

试验注册

荷兰试验注册库,NTR5188。于2015年4月9日注册。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f592/5385082/0cea9f0e1509/13063_2017_1892_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f592/5385082/ca4e6bad32a9/13063_2017_1892_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f592/5385082/e28b328c7c6e/13063_2017_1892_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f592/5385082/0cea9f0e1509/13063_2017_1892_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f592/5385082/ca4e6bad32a9/13063_2017_1892_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f592/5385082/e28b328c7c6e/13063_2017_1892_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f592/5385082/0cea9f0e1509/13063_2017_1892_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Minimally invasive versus open distal pancreatectomy (LEOPARD): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.微创与开放远端胰腺切除术(LEOPARD):一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2017 Apr 8;18(1):166. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-1892-9.
2
Minimally Invasive Versus Open Distal Pancreatectomy (LEOPARD): A Multicenter Patient-blinded Randomized Controlled Trial.微创与开腹远端胰腺切除术(LEOPARD):一项多中心患者盲法随机对照试验。
Ann Surg. 2019 Jan;269(1):2-9. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002979.
3
Minimally invasive versus open distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (DIPLOMA): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.微创与开腹胰体尾切除术治疗胰腺导管腺癌(DIPLOMA):一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2021 Sep 9;22(1):608. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05506-z.
4
Minimally invasive versus open pancreatoduodenectomy (LEOPARD-2): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.微创与开放胰十二指肠切除术(LEOPARD-2):一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2018 Jan 3;19(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2423-4.
5
Costs and quality of life in a randomized trial comparing minimally invasive and open distal pancreatectomy (LEOPARD trial).随机对照试验比较微创和开放远端胰腺切除术的成本和生活质量(LEOPARD 试验)。
Br J Surg. 2019 Jun;106(7):910-921. doi: 10.1002/bjs.11147. Epub 2019 Apr 23.
6
Long-Term Quality of Life after Minimally Invasive vs Open Distal Pancreatectomy in the LEOPARD Randomized Trial.LEOPARD 随机试验:微创与开放远端胰腺切除术的长期生活质量比较。
J Am Coll Surg. 2021 Dec;233(6):730-739.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2021.08.687. Epub 2021 Sep 13.
7
Analysis of 90-day cost for open versus minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy.分析开腹与微创远端胰腺切除术 90 天的成本。
HPB (Oxford). 2019 Jan;21(1):60-66. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2018.07.003. Epub 2018 Jul 31.
8
A multi-institutional randomized phase III study comparing minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy versus open distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer; Japan Clinical Oncology Group study JCOG2202 (LAPAN study).一项多机构随机III期研究,比较微创远端胰腺切除术与开放性远端胰腺切除术治疗胰腺癌;日本临床肿瘤学组研究JCOG2202(LAPAN研究)。
BMC Cancer. 2024 Feb 19;24(1):231. doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-11957-9.
9
Nationwide use and Outcome of Minimally Invasive Distal Pancreatectomy in IDEAL Stage IV following a Training Program and Randomized Trial.在一项培训项目和随机试验之后,理想IV期微创远端胰腺切除术的全国性应用及结果
Ann Surg. 2024 Feb 1;279(2):323-330. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005900. Epub 2023 May 4.
10
Evaluation of cost-effectiveness among open, laparoscopic and robotic distal pancreatectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.开腹、腹腔镜和机器人辅助远端胰腺切除术的成本效益评估:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Am J Surg. 2021 Sep;222(3):513-520. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2021.03.066. Epub 2021 Apr 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Pancreaticoduodenectomy for octogenarians under postoperative rehabilitation enhanced ERAS protocol.胰十二指肠切除术在术后康复强化 ERAS 方案下用于 80 岁以上患者。
BMC Surg. 2024 Nov 12;24(1):353. doi: 10.1186/s12893-024-02656-0.
2
Updated Principles of Surgical Management of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumours (pNETs): What Every Surgeon Needs to Know.胰腺神经内分泌肿瘤(pNETs)手术管理的更新原则:每位外科医生都需要了解的内容。
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Nov 27;13(23):5969. doi: 10.3390/cancers13235969.
3
Minimally invasive versus open distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (DIPLOMA): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

本文引用的文献

1
Continuous wound infiltration versus epidural analgesia after hepato-pancreato-biliary surgery (POP-UP): a randomised controlled, open-label, non-inferiority trial.肝胰胆手术后持续切口浸润与硬膜外镇痛(POP-UP):一项随机对照、开放性标签、非劣效性试验。
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016 Oct;1(2):105-113. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(16)30012-7. Epub 2016 Jul 7.
2
Impact of a Nationwide Training Program in Minimally Invasive Distal Pancreatectomy (LAELAPS).全国性微创远端胰腺切除术(LAELAPS)培训计划的影响。
Ann Surg. 2016 Nov;264(5):754-762. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001888.
3
Blinding in randomized controlled trials in general and abdominal surgery: protocol for a systematic review and empirical study.
微创与开腹胰体尾切除术治疗胰腺导管腺癌(DIPLOMA):一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2021 Sep 9;22(1):608. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05506-z.
4
Feasibility and safety of robotic-assisted total pancreatectomy: a pilot western series.机器人辅助全胰切除术的可行性和安全性:一项西方初步系列研究。
Updates Surg. 2021 Jun;73(3):955-966. doi: 10.1007/s13304-021-01079-3. Epub 2021 May 19.
5
Protocol for a randomised controlled trial to compare postoperative complications between minimally invasive and open DIStal PAnCreaTectomy (DISPACT-2 trial).一项比较微创与开放远端胰腺切除术术后并发症的随机对照试验方案(DISPACT-2试验)
BMJ Open. 2021 Feb 22;11(2):e047867. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047867.
6
Evaluation of robotic versus open partial pancreatoduodenectomy-study protocol for a randomised controlled pilot trial (EUROPA, DRKS00020407).机器人辅助与开放部分胰十二指肠切除术的评估——一项随机对照试验的研究方案(EUROPA,DRKS00020407)
Trials. 2021 Jan 8;22(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04933-8.
7
Surgical Management of Neuroendocrine Tumours of the Pancreas.胰腺神经内分泌肿瘤的外科治疗
J Clin Med. 2020 Sep 16;9(9):2993. doi: 10.3390/jcm9092993.
8
The laparoscopic approach to distal pancreatectomy is a value-added proposition for patients undergoing care in moderate-volume and high-volume centers.腹腔镜胰体尾切除术对于在中、高容量中心接受治疗的患者来说是一个增值方案。
Surgery. 2019 Aug;166(2):166-171. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2019.04.019. Epub 2019 May 31.
9
Costs and quality of life in a randomized trial comparing minimally invasive and open distal pancreatectomy (LEOPARD trial).随机对照试验比较微创和开放远端胰腺切除术的成本和生活质量(LEOPARD 试验)。
Br J Surg. 2019 Jun;106(7):910-921. doi: 10.1002/bjs.11147. Epub 2019 Apr 23.
10
The oncological safety in minimally invasive versus open distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.微创与开放远端胰腺切除术治疗胰腺导管腺癌的肿瘤安全性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Sci Rep. 2019 Feb 4;9(1):1159. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-37617-0.
一般及腹部手术随机对照试验中的盲法:系统评价与实证研究方案
Syst Rev. 2016 Mar 24;5:48. doi: 10.1186/s13643-016-0226-4.
4
Laparoscopic pancreatic surgery for benign and malignant disease.腹腔镜胰腺手术治疗良恶性疾病。
Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016 Apr;13(4):227-38. doi: 10.1038/nrgastro.2016.17. Epub 2016 Feb 17.
5
Laparoscopic radical 'no-touch' left pancreatosplenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: technique and results.腹腔镜根治性“非接触”左胰脾切除术治疗胰腺导管腺癌:技术与结果
Surg Endosc. 2016 Sep;30(9):3830-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4685-9. Epub 2015 Dec 16.
6
Laparoscopic Distal Pancreatectomy for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: Time for a Randomized Controlled Trial? Results of an All-inclusive National Observational Study.腹腔镜下远端胰腺切除术治疗胰腺导管腺癌:是时候进行随机对照试验了吗?一项全国性全面观察性研究的结果
Ann Surg. 2015 Nov;262(5):868-73; discussion 873-4. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001479.
7
Understanding the Hawthorne effect.理解霍桑效应。
BMJ. 2015 Sep 4;351:h4672. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h4672.
8
Minimally Invasive Distal Pancreatectomy for Cancer: Short-Term Oncologic Outcomes in 1,733 Patients.微创远端胰腺癌切除术:1733例患者的短期肿瘤学结局
World J Surg. 2015 Oct;39(10):2564-72. doi: 10.1007/s00268-015-3138-x.
9
A randomized trial of laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer.腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗直肠癌的随机对照研究。
N Engl J Med. 2015 Apr 2;372(14):1324-32. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1414882.
10
A nationwide comparison of laparoscopic and open distal pancreatectomy for benign and malignant disease.腹腔镜与开放远端胰腺切除术治疗良恶性疾病的全国性比较。
J Am Coll Surg. 2015 Mar;220(3):263-270.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.11.010. Epub 2014 Nov 20.