• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国外科医师学院 NSQIP 手术风险计算器准确性的研究

An Examination of American College of Surgeons NSQIP Surgical Risk Calculator Accuracy.

机构信息

Division of Research and Optimal Patient Care, American College of Surgeons, Chicago, IL.

Division of Research and Optimal Patient Care, American College of Surgeons, Chicago, IL.

出版信息

J Am Coll Surg. 2017 May;224(5):787-795e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2016.12.057. Epub 2017 Apr 4.

DOI:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2016.12.057
PMID:28389191
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The American College of Surgeons NSQIP offers a Surgical Risk Calculator (SRC) that provides detailed, patient-level, risk assessments for many adverse outcomes to surgeons, patients, and the general public. The SRC calculator was designed to help guide discussion and decisions by providing generally applicable (not hospital-specific) information about surgical risk using easily understood and broadly available preoperative variables. Although large, internal evaluations have shown that the SRC has good accuracy (model discrimination and calibration), external validations have been inconsistent and tend to favor a conclusion of inadequate performance.

STUDY DESIGN

External studies, attempting to validate the SRC, were examined with respect to 3 design features: sample size (small samples reduce reliability), case-mix homogeneity (homogeneity reduces discrimination); and number of institutions providing data (few institutions reduces generalizability). The impact of each feature was then examined in several sets of simulation studies.

RESULTS

Each of the 3 design features has the potential to act as an artifactual cause for apparent SRC predictive failure. In addition, demonstrations that SRC estimates are inferior to those from models that use additional (sometimes operation-specific) predictor variables were seen as not relevant with respect to the SRC's intended scope.

CONCLUSIONS

The SRC predictive failures, reported by studies with the described design limitations, should not be misunderstood as disqualifying the SRC as an accurate and appropriate tool for its intended purpose of providing a general purpose risk calculator, applicable across many surgical domains, using easily understood and generally available predictive information.

摘要

背景

美国外科医师学院 NSQIP 提供了一个外科风险计算器 (SRC),为外科医生、患者和公众提供了许多不良结果的详细、患者水平的风险评估。SRC 计算器旨在通过使用易于理解和广泛可用的术前变量提供关于手术风险的一般适用(非医院特定)信息,帮助指导讨论和决策。尽管进行了大量的内部评估,但 SRC 的准确性(模型区分度和校准度)良好,外部验证结果却不一致,往往倾向于认为其性能不足。

研究设计

针对 SRC 的外部验证研究,从以下 3 个设计特征进行了检查:样本量(样本量小会降低可靠性)、病例组合同质性(同质性降低区分度)和提供数据的机构数量(机构数量少会降低通用性)。然后在几组模拟研究中检查了每个特征的影响。

结果

这 3 个设计特征中的每一个都有可能成为 SRC 预测失败的人为原因。此外,认为 SRC 估计值不如使用额外(有时是特定于手术的)预测变量的模型的估计值,这与 SRC 的预期用途无关。

结论

在具有描述性设计限制的研究中报告的 SRC 预测失败,不应被误解为 SRC 作为一种准确和适当的工具,用于提供一种通用目的的风险计算器,适用于许多外科领域,使用易于理解和普遍可用的预测信息。

相似文献

1
An Examination of American College of Surgeons NSQIP Surgical Risk Calculator Accuracy.美国外科医师学院 NSQIP 手术风险计算器准确性的研究
J Am Coll Surg. 2017 May;224(5):787-795e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2016.12.057. Epub 2017 Apr 4.
2
Evaluating the Inaccuracy of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Project Surgical Risk Calculator in Plastic Surgery: A Meta-analysis of Short-Term Predicted Complications.评估国家外科质量改进计划外科风险计算器在整形外科中的不准确性:短期预测并发症的荟萃分析。
Ann Plast Surg. 2022 May 1;88(3 Suppl 3):S219-S223. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000003189.
3
The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Surgical Risk Calculator Does Not Accurately Predict Risk of 30-Day Complications Among Patients Undergoing Microvascular Head and Neck Reconstruction.美国外科医师学会国家外科质量改进计划手术风险计算器不能准确预测接受微血管头颈重建手术患者发生30天并发症的风险。
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016 Sep;74(9):1850-8. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2016.02.024. Epub 2016 Mar 3.
4
Comparison of accuracy of prediction of postoperative mortality and morbidity between a new, parsimonious risk calculator (SURPAS) and the ACS Surgical Risk Calculator.新的简化风险计算器(SURPAS)与美国外科医师学会手术风险计算器预测术后死亡率和发病率的准确性比较。
Am J Surg. 2020 Jun;219(6):1065-1072. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2019.07.036. Epub 2019 Jul 29.
5
Enhancing the American College of Surgeons NSQIP Surgical Risk Calculator to Predict Geriatric Outcomes.增强美国外科医师学会 NSQIP 手术风险计算器预测老年结局。
J Am Coll Surg. 2020 Jan;230(1):88-100.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2019.09.017. Epub 2019 Oct 28.
6
Can the American College of Surgeons Risk Calculator Predict 30-day Complications After Spine Surgery?美国外科医师学院风险计算器能否预测脊柱手术后 30 天的并发症?
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2020 May 1;45(9):621-628. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003340.
7
Predictive performance of the American College of Surgeons universal risk calculator in neurosurgical patients.美国外科医师学院通用风险计算器在神经外科患者中的预测性能。
J Neurosurg. 2018 Mar;128(3):942-947. doi: 10.3171/2016.11.JNS161377. Epub 2017 Apr 28.
8
Validation of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program risk predictor in an Australian general surgical cohort.验证美国外科医师学会国家外科质量改进计划风险预测因子在澳大利亚普通外科队列中的应用。
ANZ J Surg. 2024 Feb;94(1-2):108-116. doi: 10.1111/ans.18710. Epub 2023 Oct 4.
9
Utility of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program surgical risk calculator in predicting mortality in an Australian acute surgical unit.美国外科医师学会国家外科质量改进计划手术风险计算器在预测澳大利亚一家急性外科病房死亡率方面的效用。
ANZ J Surg. 2020 May;90(5):746-751. doi: 10.1111/ans.15892. Epub 2020 Apr 29.
10
Assessment of the NSQIP Surgical Risk Calculator in Predicting Microvascular Head and Neck Reconstruction Outcomes.评估 NSQIP 手术风险计算器预测微血管头颈部重建结果的能力。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019 Jan;160(1):100-106. doi: 10.1177/0194599818789132. Epub 2018 Jul 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Predicting Postoperative Complications in Older Patients Undergoing Head and Neck Microvascular Reconstruction Using the National Quality Improvement Program Risk Calculator.使用国家质量改进计划风险计算器预测接受头颈部微血管重建术的老年患者术后并发症
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2025 Jun 26;13(6):e6910. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000006910. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Development and validation of a new predictive model for in-hospital postoperative major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events after general anesthesia in nonagenarians undergoing non-cardiac surgery.非心脏手术的老年患者全麻术后院内主要不良心脑血管事件新预测模型的开发与验证
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2025 Jun 10;12:1590496. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2025.1590496. eCollection 2025.
3
Deep learning neural network prediction of postoperative complications in patients undergoing laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with or without CME and CVL for colon cancer: insights from SICE (Società Italiana di Chirurgia Endoscopica) CoDIG data.深度学习神经网络对接受腹腔镜右半结肠切除术(伴或不伴中央血管结扎术和全结肠系膜切除术)的结肠癌患者术后并发症的预测:来自意大利内镜外科学会(SICE)CoDIG数据的见解
Tech Coloproctol. 2025 Jun 11;29(1):135. doi: 10.1007/s10151-025-03165-9.
4
The CLUE postsurgery VTE risk instrument for abdominal and pelvic surgery: validation of patient risk factor component.用于腹部和盆腔手术的CLUE术后静脉血栓栓塞风险评估工具:患者风险因素部分的验证
Blood Adv. 2025 Aug 12;9(15):3837-3844. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2024015515.
5
Anaesthesia in chronic dialysis patients: A narrative review.慢性透析患者的麻醉:一篇叙述性综述。
World J Crit Care Med. 2025 Mar 9;14(1):100503. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v14.i1.100503.
6
Outcome prediction after emergency cholecystectomy: performance evaluation of the ACS-NSQIP surgical risk calculator and the 5-item modified frailty index.急诊胆囊切除术后的结局预测:美国外科医师学会国家外科质量改进计划(ACS-NSQIP)手术风险计算器和5项改良虚弱指数的性能评估
Updates Surg. 2025 Apr;77(2):481-491. doi: 10.1007/s13304-025-02128-x. Epub 2025 Feb 24.
7
A meta-analysis of the American college of surgeons risk calculator's predictive accuracy among different surgical sub-specialties.美国外科医师学会风险计算器在不同外科亚专业中的预测准确性的荟萃分析。
Surg Pract Sci. 2024 Feb 13;16:100238. doi: 10.1016/j.sipas.2024.100238. eCollection 2024 Mar.
8
Comparing prediction accuracy for 30-day readmission following primary total knee arthroplasty: the ACS-NSQIP risk calculator versus a novel artificial neural network model.比较初次全膝关节置换术后30天再入院的预测准确性:美国外科医师学会国家外科质量改进计划(ACS-NSQIP)风险计算器与新型人工神经网络模型
Knee Surg Relat Res. 2025 Jan 13;37(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s43019-024-00256-z.
9
Assessing the value of deep neural networks for postoperative complication prediction in pancreaticoduodenectomy patients.评估深度神经网络在胰十二指肠切除术患者术后并发症预测中的价值。
PLoS One. 2024 Dec 30;19(12):e0316402. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0316402. eCollection 2024.
10
Using A Surgical Risk Predictor to Estimate Percutaneous Cryoablation Adverse Event Risk: A Single Center Comparative Analysis.使用手术风险预测器评估经皮冷冻消融不良事件风险:单中心对比分析
J Am Coll Radiol. 2025 May;22(5):550-560. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2024.12.006. Epub 2024 Dec 18.