Lee Ja Y, Lindquist Kristen A, Nam Chang S
Industrial and Systems Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison WI, USA.
Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill NC, USA.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2017 Mar 24;11:133. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00133. eCollection 2017.
There is debate about whether , the tendency to label emotions in a nuanced and specific manner, is merely a product of labeling abilities, or a systematic difference in the experience of emotion during emotionally evocative events. According to the Conceptual Act Theory of Emotion (CAT) (Barrett, 2006), emotional granularity is due to the latter and is a product of on-going temporal differences in how individuals categorize and thus make meaning of their affective states. To address this question, the present study investigated the effects of individual differences in emotional granularity on electroencephalography-based brain activity during the experience of emotion in response to affective images. Event-related potentials (ERP) and event-related desynchronization and synchronization (ERD/ERS) analysis techniques were used. We found that ERP responses during the very early (60-90 ms), middle (270-300 ms), and later (540-570 ms) moments of stimulus presentation were associated with individuals' level of granularity. We also observed that highly granular individuals, compared to lowly granular individuals, exhibited relatively stable desynchronization of alpha power (8-12 Hz) and synchronization of gamma power (30-50 Hz) during the 3 s of stimulus presentation. Overall, our results suggest that emotional granularity is related to differences in neural processing throughout emotional experiences and that high granularity could be associated with access to executive control resources and a more habitual processing of affective stimuli, or a kind of "emotional complexity." Implications for models of emotion are also discussed.
关于以细致入微和具体的方式给情绪贴标签的倾向,究竟仅仅是贴标签能力的产物,还是在引发情绪的事件中情绪体验的系统性差异,存在争议。根据情绪概念行为理论(CAT)(巴雷特,2006年),情绪粒度是由后者导致的,并且是个体在对其情感状态进行分类从而赋予意义的过程中持续存在的时间差异的产物。为了解决这个问题,本研究调查了情绪粒度的个体差异对在对情感图像产生情绪体验期间基于脑电图的大脑活动的影响。使用了事件相关电位(ERP)以及事件相关去同步化和同步化(ERD/ERS)分析技术。我们发现,在刺激呈现的极早期(60 - 90毫秒)、中期(270 - 300毫秒)和后期(540 - 570毫秒),ERP反应与个体的粒度水平相关。我们还观察到,与低粒度个体相比,高粒度个体在刺激呈现的3秒内表现出相对稳定的α波功率(8 - 12赫兹)去同步化和γ波功率(30 - 50赫兹)同步化。总体而言,我们的结果表明,情绪粒度与整个情绪体验过程中的神经处理差异有关,并且高粒度可能与执行控制资源的获取以及对情感刺激的更习惯性处理相关,或者与一种“情绪复杂性”相关。还讨论了对情绪模型的启示。