• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

情绪粒度与认知重评对青少年社交焦虑和人际关系的影响:贝叶斯网络分析

Emotional Granularity and Cognitive Reappraisal Affect Social Anxiety and Interpersonal Relationships in Adolescents: A Bayesian Network Analysis.

作者信息

Lian Wen, Zhu Xinyi, Xu Tingting, Fan Lu, Sun Yuqi

机构信息

Department of Psychology, School of Education, Wenzhou University, Wenzhou 325035, China.

Department of Psychology, Jing Hengyi School of Education, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou 311121, China.

出版信息

Depress Anxiety. 2025 Feb 27;2025:8658973. doi: 10.1155/da/8658973. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.1155/da/8658973
PMID:40225730
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11987076/
Abstract

Emotional granularity (EG), the ability to finely distinguish emotional experiences, plays a crucial role in emotion regulation and social interactions. This study measures EG using a standardized experimental procedure and assesses related variables through questionnaires. We employ both undirected graphical Gaussian models (GGM) and directed Bayesian network analysis (NA) to investigate how positive EG (PEG) and negative EG (NEG), in conjunction with emotion regulation, uniquely influences social anxiety and interpersonal relationships. The sample comprised 407 junior high school students from China, aged 13-14 years old. We utilized the Photo Emotion Differentiation Task (PED task), Emotion Regulation Scale (ERS), Interpersonal Relationship Comprehensive Diagnostic Scale (IRCDS), and Adolescent Social Anxiety Scale (SAS-A) to measure emotional differentiation, emotion regulation, interpersonal relationships, and social anxiety, respectively. The undirected network highlights a pronounced relationship between interpersonal relationships and social anxiety. "Socialization and Friendship Distress" shows the highest expected influence, followed by "Social Avoidance and Distress in General Situations", and "Conversational Distress". Bayesian NA indicates that both PEG and NEG, along with cognitive reappraisal (CR), influence social anxiety and interpersonal relationships. PEG directly affects social anxiety features, whereas NEG is influenced by them. Additionally, females experience more severe issues with interpersonal relationships and social anxiety than males. The study revealed that individuals with lower positive EG directly impact social anxiety and interpersonal issues, and indirectly affect CR. Conversely, negative EG is mainly influenced by social anxiety symptoms and directly affects CR strategies. These findings highlight the importance of EG in adolescent mental health, suggesting that enhancing emotional differentiation could effectively address social anxiety and foster healthier interpersonal relationships.

摘要

情绪粒度(EG),即精细区分情绪体验的能力,在情绪调节和社交互动中起着至关重要的作用。本研究采用标准化实验程序测量EG,并通过问卷评估相关变量。我们同时运用无向图形高斯模型(GGM)和有向贝叶斯网络分析(NA)来探究积极情绪粒度(PEG)和消极情绪粒度(NEG)如何与情绪调节相结合,独特地影响社交焦虑和人际关系。样本包括407名来自中国的13 - 14岁初中生。我们分别使用照片情绪分化任务(PED任务)、情绪调节量表(ERS)、人际关系综合诊断量表(IRCDS)和青少年社交焦虑量表(SAS - A)来测量情绪分化、情绪调节、人际关系和社交焦虑。无向网络突出了人际关系与社交焦虑之间的显著关系。“社交化与友谊困扰”显示出最高的预期影响,其次是“一般情境下的社交回避与困扰”以及“对话困扰”。贝叶斯网络分析表明,PEG和NEG以及认知重评(CR)都会影响社交焦虑和人际关系。PEG直接影响社交焦虑特征,而NEG受其影响。此外,女性在人际关系和社交焦虑方面比男性面临更严重的问题。研究表明,积极情绪粒度较低的个体直接影响社交焦虑和人际关系问题,并间接影响认知重评。相反,消极情绪粒度主要受社交焦虑症状影响,并直接影响认知重评策略。这些发现突出了情绪粒度在青少年心理健康中的重要性,表明增强情绪分化可以有效解决社交焦虑并促进更健康的人际关系。

相似文献

1
Emotional Granularity and Cognitive Reappraisal Affect Social Anxiety and Interpersonal Relationships in Adolescents: A Bayesian Network Analysis.情绪粒度与认知重评对青少年社交焦虑和人际关系的影响:贝叶斯网络分析
Depress Anxiety. 2025 Feb 27;2025:8658973. doi: 10.1155/da/8658973. eCollection 2025.
2
Social Media and Emotional Burnout Regulation During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Multilevel Approach.社交媒体与新冠疫情期间的情绪耗竭调节:多层次方法
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Mar 16;23(3):e27015. doi: 10.2196/27015.
3
Music's Dual Role in Emotion Regulation: Network Analysis of Music Use, Emotion Regulation Self-Efficacy, Alexithymia, Anxiety, and Depression.音乐在情绪调节中的双重作用:音乐使用、情绪调节自我效能感、述情障碍、焦虑和抑郁的网络分析
Depress Anxiety. 2024 Jun 28;2024:1790168. doi: 10.1155/2024/1790168. eCollection 2024.
4
Exploring the Interplay Between Self-Identity, Affective Style, Emotion Regulation, and Anxiety: Based on Bayesian Network Model.基于贝叶斯网络模型探索自我认同、情感风格、情绪调节与焦虑之间的相互作用
Brain Behav. 2025 Feb;15(2):e70290. doi: 10.1002/brb3.70290.
5
Cognitive Reappraisal and Expressive Suppression Evoke Distinct Neural Connections during Interpersonal Emotion Regulation.认知重评和表达抑制在人际情绪调节中引发不同的神经连接。
J Neurosci. 2023 Dec 6;43(49):8456-8471. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0954-23.2023.
6
Daily interpersonal tensions and well-being among older adults: The role of emotion regulation strategies.老年人的日常人际紧张与幸福感:情绪调节策略的作用。
Psychol Aging. 2020 Jun;35(4):578-590. doi: 10.1037/pag0000416. Epub 2019 Oct 31.
7
Adult attachment and social anxiety: The mediating role of emotion regulation strategies.成人依恋与社交焦虑:情绪调节策略的中介作用。
PLoS One. 2018 Dec 28;13(12):e0207514. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0207514. eCollection 2018.
8
Self-compassion and emotional regulation as predictors of social anxiety.自我同情与情绪调节作为社交焦虑的预测因素
Psychol Psychother. 2021 Sep;94(3):426-442. doi: 10.1111/papt.12318. Epub 2020 Nov 20.
9
Interpersonal emotion regulation and physiological synchrony: cognitive reappraisal versus expressive suppression.人际情绪调节与生理同步性:认知重评与表达抑制
Cogn Emot. 2025 May;39(3):663-674. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2024.2371092. Epub 2024 Jul 7.
10
The effect of interpersonal relationship and epidemic attention on negative emotion among medical students: the mediating role of social satisfaction.人际关系和疫情关注度对医学生负面情绪的影响:社会满意度的中介作用。
BMC Psychiatry. 2023 Aug 21;23(1):610. doi: 10.1186/s12888-023-05113-z.

本文引用的文献

1
Examining the reciprocal link between social anxiety and social relationships spanning from childhood to adulthood: A meta-analysis of longitudinal studies.考察从儿童期到成年期社会焦虑与社会关系之间的互惠关系:纵向研究的元分析。
Dev Psychol. 2024 Jan;60(1):170-186. doi: 10.1037/dev0001666. Epub 2023 Nov 16.
2
Emotions in social anxiety disorder: A review.社交焦虑障碍中的情绪:综述。
J Anxiety Disord. 2023 Apr;95:102696. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2023.102696. Epub 2023 Mar 2.
3
The Prevalence of Adolescent Social Fears and Social Anxiety Disorder in School Contexts.
青少年在学校环境中社会恐惧和社交焦虑障碍的流行率。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 30;19(19):12458. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191912458.
4
Emotional complexity under high stress: Do protective associations for risk behaviors persist even during a pandemic?高压力下的情绪复杂性:即使在大流行期间,危险行为的保护性关联是否依然存在?
Emotion. 2023 Apr;23(3):879-885. doi: 10.1037/emo0001133. Epub 2022 Aug 8.
5
A tutorial on bayesian networks for psychopathology researchers.贝叶斯网络在精神病理学研究中的应用教程。
Psychol Methods. 2023 Aug;28(4):947-961. doi: 10.1037/met0000479. Epub 2022 Feb 3.
6
From Knowledge to Differentiation: Increasing Emotion Knowledge Through an Intervention Increases Negative Emotion Differentiation.从知识到分化:通过干预增加情绪知识可提升负面情绪分化。
Front Psychol. 2021 Nov 26;12:703757. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.703757. eCollection 2021.
7
Emotion Differentiation and Youth Mental Health: Current Understanding and Open Questions.情绪分化与青少年心理健康:当前的认识与待解问题
Front Psychol. 2021 Aug 6;12:700298. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.700298. eCollection 2021.
8
Emotion Differentiation as a Protective Factor Against the Behavioral Consequences of Rumination: A Conceptual Replication and Extension in the Context of Social Anxiety.情绪分化作为反刍行为后果的保护因素:社会焦虑情境下的概念复制与扩展
Behav Ther. 2020 Jan;51(1):135-148. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2019.05.011. Epub 2019 May 31.
9
Do I really feel better? Effectiveness of emotion regulation strategies depends on the measure and social anxiety.我真的感觉好些了吗?情绪调节策略的有效性取决于测量方法和社交焦虑程度。
Depress Anxiety. 2019 Dec;36(12):1182-1190. doi: 10.1002/da.22970. Epub 2019 Oct 25.
10
Social anxiety disorder and emotion regulation problems in adolescents.青少年的社交焦虑障碍与情绪调节问题
Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health. 2019 Sep 30;13:37. doi: 10.1186/s13034-019-0297-9. eCollection 2019.