a Department of Pharmacy, Health Sciences Faculty , University of Brasilia , Brasilia , Brazil.
b Department of Dentistry, Brazilian Centre for Evidence-Based Research , Federal University of Santa Catarina , Florianopolis , SC , Brazil / School of Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry , University of Alberta , Canada.
Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2018;58(12):2068-2081. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2017.1304358. Epub 2017 Aug 18.
Data about harms or benefits associated with the consumption of aspartame, a nonnutritive sweetener worldwide consumed, are still controversial. This systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials aimed to assess the effect of aspartame consumption on metabolic parameters related to diabetes and obesity. The search was performed on Cochrane, LILACS, PubMed, SCOPUS, Web of Science databases, and on a gray literature using Open Grey, Google Scholar, and ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. Searches across all databases were conducted from the earliest available date up to April 13, 2016, without date and language restrictions. Pooled mean differences were calculated using a random or fixed-effects model for heterogeneous and homogenous studies, respectively. Twenty-nine articles were included in qualitative synthesis and twelve, presenting numeric results, were used in meta-analysis. Fasting blood glucose (mmol/L), insulin levels (μU/mL), total cholesterol (mmol/L), triglycerides concentrations (mmol/L), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (mmol/L), body weight (kg), and energy intake (MJ) were considered as the main outcomes in subjects that consumed aspartame, and results were presented as mean difference; % confidence interval, range. Aspartame consumption was not associated with alterations on blood glucose levels compared to control (-0.03 mmol/L; 95% CI, -0.21 to 0.14) or to sucrose (0.31 mmol/L; 95% CI, -0.05 to 0.67) and on insulin levels compared to control (0.13 μU/mL; 95% CI, -0.69 to 0.95) or to sucrose (2.54 μU/mL; 95% CI, -6.29 to 11.37). Total cholesterol was not affected by aspartame consumption compared to control (-0.02 mmol/L; 95% CI, -0.31 to 0.27) or to sucrose (-0.24 mmol/L; 95% CI, -0.89 to 0.42). Triglycerides concentrations were not affected by aspartame consumption compared to control (0.00 mmol/L; 95% CI, -0.04 to 0.05) or to sucrose (0.00 mmol/L; 95% CI, -0.09 to 0.09). High-density lipoprotein cholesterol serum levels were higher on aspartame compared to control (-0.03 mmol/L; 95% CI, -0.06 to -0.01) and lower on aspartame compared to sucrose (0.05 mmol/L; 95% CI, 0.02 to 0.09). Body weight did not change after aspartame consumption compared to control (5.00 kg; 95% CI, -1.56 to 11.56) or to sucrose (3.78 kg; 95% CI, -2.18 to 9.74). Energy intake was not altered by aspartame consumption compared to control (-0.49 MJ; 95% CI, -1.21 to 0.22) or to sucrose (-0.17 MJ; 95% CI, -2.03 to 1.69). Data concerning effects of aspartame on main metabolic variables associated to diabetes and obesity do not support a beneficial related to its consumption.
关于阿斯巴甜(一种全球范围内消费的非营养性甜味剂)的消费与危害或益处相关的数据仍然存在争议。本系统评价和荟萃分析旨在评估阿斯巴甜的消费对与糖尿病和肥胖相关的代谢参数的影响。该研究在 Cochrane、LILACS、PubMed、SCOPUS、Web of Science 数据库以及 Open Grey、Google Scholar 和 ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global 等灰色文献中进行了检索。从最早可用的日期到 2016 年 4 月 13 日,在所有数据库中进行了搜索,没有日期和语言限制。对于异质性和同质性研究,分别使用随机或固定效应模型计算了汇总均值差异。29 篇文章进行了定性综合分析,12 篇有数值结果的文章用于荟萃分析。空腹血糖(mmol/L)、胰岛素水平(μU/mL)、总胆固醇(mmol/L)、甘油三酯浓度(mmol/L)、高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(mmol/L)、体重(kg)和能量摄入(MJ)被认为是食用阿斯巴甜的受试者的主要结果,结果以均值差表示;%置信区间,范围。与对照组相比,阿斯巴甜的消费与血糖水平的变化无关(-0.03 mmol/L;95%置信区间,-0.21 至 0.14)或与蔗糖相比(0.31 mmol/L;95%置信区间,-0.05 至 0.67),与对照组相比,阿斯巴甜的消费与胰岛素水平的变化也无关(0.13 μU/mL;95%置信区间,-0.69 至 0.95)或与蔗糖相比(2.54 μU/mL;95%置信区间,-6.29 至 11.37)。与对照组相比,阿斯巴甜的消费对总胆固醇水平没有影响(-0.02 mmol/L;95%置信区间,-0.31 至 0.27)或与蔗糖相比(-0.24 mmol/L;95%置信区间,-0.89 至 0.42)。与对照组相比,阿斯巴甜的消费对甘油三酯浓度没有影响(0.00 mmol/L;95%置信区间,-0.04 至 0.05)或与蔗糖相比(0.00 mmol/L;95%置信区间,-0.09 至 0.09)。与对照组相比,高密度脂蛋白胆固醇血清水平在阿斯巴甜组更高(-0.03 mmol/L;95%置信区间,-0.06 至 -0.01),在阿斯巴甜组更低(0.05 mmol/L;95%置信区间,0.02 至 0.09)。与对照组相比,食用阿斯巴甜后体重没有变化(5.00 kg;95%置信区间,-1.56 至 11.56)或与蔗糖相比(3.78 kg;95%置信区间,-2.18 至 9.74)。与对照组相比,阿斯巴甜的消费对能量摄入没有影响(-0.49 MJ;95%置信区间,-1.21 至 0.22)或与蔗糖相比(-0.17 MJ;95%置信区间,-2.03 至 1.69)。关于阿斯巴甜对与糖尿病和肥胖相关的主要代谢变量的影响的数据不支持其消费有益。