London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, 15-17 Tavistock Place, London, WC1H 9SH, UK.
University College London-Institute of Education, London, UK.
Prev Sci. 2017 Oct;18(7):839-853. doi: 10.1007/s11121-017-0775-3.
We aimed to investigate whether the Good School Toolkit reduced emotional violence, severe physical violence, sexual violence and injuries from school staff to students, as well as emotional, physical and sexual violence between peers, in Ugandan primary schools. We performed a two-arm cluster randomised controlled trial with parallel assignment. Forty-two schools in one district were allocated to intervention (n = 21) or wait-list control (n = 21) arms in 2012. We did cross-sectional baseline and endline surveys in 2012 and 2014, and the Good School Toolkit intervention was implemented for 18 months between surveys. Analyses were by intention to treat and are adjusted for clustering within schools and for baseline school-level proportions of outcomes. The Toolkit was associated with an overall reduction in any form of violence from staff and/or peers in the past week towards both male (aOR = 0.34, 95%CI 0.22-0.53) and female students (aOR = 0.55, 95%CI 0.36-0.84). Injuries as a result of violence from school staff were also lower in male (aOR = 0.36, 95%CI 0.20-0.65) and female students (aOR = 0.51, 95%CI 0.29-0.90). Although the Toolkit seems to be effective at reducing violence in both sexes, there is some suggestion that the Toolkit may have stronger effects in boys than girls. The Toolkit is a promising intervention to reduce a wide range of different forms of violence from school staff and between peers in schools, and should be urgently considered for scale-up. Further research is needed to investigate how the intervention could engage more successfully with girls.
我们旨在探究“好学校工具包”是否能减少乌干达小学中教职员工对学生的情感暴力、严重身体暴力、性暴力和伤害,以及学生之间的情感、身体和性暴力。我们进行了一项两臂整群随机对照试验,采用平行分组。2012 年,一个地区的 42 所学校被分配到干预(n=21)或候补名单对照(n=21)组。我们在 2012 年和 2014 年进行了横断面基线和终点调查,在调查之间实施了 18 个月的“好学校工具包”干预。分析采用意向治疗,并调整了学校内的聚类和基线学校水平结局的比例。该工具包与过去一周来自教职员工和/或同伴的任何形式的暴力行为总体减少有关,无论是对男生(aOR=0.34,95%CI 0.22-0.53)还是女生(aOR=0.55,95%CI 0.36-0.84)。男生(aOR=0.36,95%CI 0.20-0.65)和女生(aOR=0.51,95%CI 0.29-0.90)因教职员工暴力而受伤的情况也有所减少。尽管该工具包似乎对减少两性暴力都有效,但有一些迹象表明,该工具包对男孩的效果可能比女孩更强。该工具包是一种很有前途的干预措施,可以减少学校教职员工和学生之间广泛的不同形式的暴力行为,应该紧急考虑扩大规模。需要进一步研究该干预措施如何更成功地吸引女孩参与。