Raby K Lee, Yarger Heather A, Lind Teresa, Fraley R Chris, Leerkes Esther, Dozier Mary
University of Utah.
University of Delaware.
Dev Psychopathol. 2017 May;29(2):365-378. doi: 10.1017/S0954579417000049.
The first aim of the current study was to examine the latent structure of attachment states of mind as assessed by the Adult Attachment Interview (AAI) among three groups of parents of children at risk for insecure attachments: parents who adopted internationally (N = 147), foster parents (N = 300), and parents living in poverty and involved with Child Protective Services (CPS; N = 284). Confirmatory factor analysis indicated the state of mind rating scales loaded on two factors reflecting adults' preoccupied and dismissing states of mind. Taxometric analyses indicated the variation in adults' preoccupied states of mind was more consistent with a dimensional than a categorical model, whereas results for dismissing states of mind were indeterminate. The second aim was to examine the degree to which the attachment states of mind of internationally adoptive and foster parents differ from those of poverty/CPS-referred parents and low-risk parents. After controlling for parental age, sex, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status, (a) internationally adoptive parents had lower scores on the dismissing dimension than the sample of community parents described by Haltigan, Leerkes, Supple, and Calkins (2014); (b) foster parents did not differ from community parents on either the dismissing or the preoccupied AAI dimension; and (c) both internationally adoptive and foster parents had lower scores on the preoccupied dimension than poverty/CPS-referred parents. Analyses using the traditional AAI categories provided convergent evidence that (a) internationally adoptive parents were more likely to be classified as having an autonomous state of mind than low-risk North American mothers based on Bakermans-Kranenburg and van IJzendoorn's (2009) meta-analytic estimates, (b) the rates of autonomous states of mind did not differ between foster and low-risk parents, and
本研究的首要目的是,通过成人依恋访谈(AAI)来考察三组有不安全依恋风险儿童的父母的依恋心理状态的潜在结构:国际收养父母(N = 147)、养父母(N = 300)以及生活贫困且与儿童保护服务机构(CPS;N = 284)有接触的父母。验证性因素分析表明,心理状态评定量表加载在反映成年人痴迷和冷漠心理状态的两个因素上。分类分析表明,成年人痴迷心理状态的变化更符合维度模型而非类别模型,而冷漠心理状态的结果则不确定。第二个目的是考察国际收养父母和养父母的依恋心理状态与贫困/CPS转介父母及低风险父母的依恋心理状态的差异程度。在控制了父母的年龄、性别、种族和社会经济地位之后,(a)国际收养父母在冷漠维度上的得分低于哈尔蒂根、利克斯、萨普尔和卡尔金斯(2014年)所描述的社区父母样本;(b)养父母在冷漠或痴迷的AAI维度上与社区父母没有差异;(c)国际收养父母和养父母在痴迷维度上的得分均低于贫困/CPS转介父母。使用传统AAI类别的分析提供了趋同的证据,即(a)根据巴克曼斯-克兰纳enburg和范·伊曾多恩(2009年)的元分析估计,国际收养父母比低风险北美母亲更有可能被归类为具有自主心理状态;(b)养父母和低风险父母的自主心理状态发生率没有差异,并且