Suppr超能文献

基础生态位是否大于实现的生态位?检验哈钦森 50 年前的预测。

Are fundamental niches larger than the realized? Testing a 50-year-old prediction by Hutchinson.

机构信息

Biodiversity Research Center and Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2017 Apr 12;12(4):e0175138. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0175138. eCollection 2017.

Abstract

For more than 50 years ecological niches have been defined as combinations of multidimensional environmental conditions permitting a species to survive and reproduce. A fundamental niche (NF) is defined as the set of conditions within which a species can live in the absence of competitors, and a realized niche (NR) is a NF hypothetically reduced by competitive interactions (and some other limiting factors). This definition implies that NF is "larger" than NR, something that has been nearly universally accepted by ecologists. However, there have been few attempts at empirical tests. Here, we present a novel quantitative test using one-dimensional estimates of NF for 105 species of reptiles and amphibians, and estimates of NR obtained from ~1.4 x 104 field observations. To specify our test, we operationalize the original classification of niche types. Our results predominantly support the hypothesis that NF 'is larger' than NR and we highlight the theoretical and practical importance of quantifying niches.

摘要

五十多年来,生态位一直被定义为多维环境条件的组合,使物种能够生存和繁殖。基础生态位(NF)被定义为在没有竞争者的情况下一个物种可以生存的条件集,而实现生态位(NR)是一个 NF 通过竞争相互作用(和一些其他限制因素)假设减少的。这个定义意味着 NF 比 NR“更大”,这几乎被生态学家普遍接受。然而,很少有尝试进行实证检验。在这里,我们使用 105 种爬行动物和两栖动物的一维 NF 估计值和从大约 1.4 x 104 个实地观测中获得的 NR 估计值,提出了一种新颖的定量测试。为了指定我们的测试,我们对原始的生态位类型分类进行了操作化。我们的结果主要支持 NF“大于”NR 的假设,并且强调了量化生态位的理论和实践重要性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验