Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation for renal cell carcinoma vs. partial nephrectomy: Comparison of long-term oncologic outcomes in both clear cell and non-clear cell of the most common subtype.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the clinical outcomes of percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (PRFA) and partial nephrectomy (PN) in patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) and non-clear cell RCC (nccRCC) of the most common subtypes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted to review the records of all the patients who underwent PRFA or PN between February 2005 and April 2014 at our institution. Patients with histologic confirmation of ccRCC, papillary RCC, and chromophobe RCC were included. The Mann-Whitney U test was applied to compare PRFA to PN in the ccRCC and nccRCC groups. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to generate the survival curves that were compared to the log-rank test.

RESULTS

A total of 264 patients meeting the selection criteria were included in this study. The tumor size ranged from 0.9 to 7.0cm. The median follow-up period was 78 months (range: 8-132 mo). Although PRFA provided comparable 10-year overall survival rates and 10-year disease-free survival (DFS) rates to PN both in ccRCC ≤4cm and nccRCC, the 10-year DFS for patients treated with PRFA was lower than that of PN in ccRCC >4cm. The DFS survival curve between the 2 operations and 2 subtypes was statistically significant in patients with tumor size >4cm. Limitations include retrospective review and selection bias.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with T1b ccRCC treated with PRFA have less favorable outcomes than those with PN whereas PRFA provides comparable oncologic outcomes to PN in patients with T1b nccRCC. It is necessary to take RCC subtypes into consideration when choosing a surgical approach to treat T1b RCC between PFRA and PN.