Section of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Section of Radiology, Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Ups J Med Sci. 2020 Feb;125(1):52-57. doi: 10.1080/03009734.2020.1720047. Epub 2020 Feb 18.
Percutaneous ablation of renal carcinoma is frequently a favourable treatment alternative, especially in elderly patients suffering from co-morbidities. Also, it is less resource-demanding than conventional surgery of renal carcinoma, and one may, therefore, assume that the incidence of this procedure may increase. Analgesia is necessary during this intervention. The aim of this study was to explore the possibility of analgosedation and its relation to patient comfort and safety during percutaneous ablation of renal carcinoma. Forty-six patients, sedated with dexmedetomidine and remifentanil, supplemented with infiltration anaesthesia (lidocaine 1%), underwent percutaneous (radiofrequency or microwave) ablation of renal carcinoma in this prospective study. The patients expected pain intensity around the numerical rating score (NRS) 4.5 (interquartile range [IQR] 3.5-5.5), which was slightly lower than pain experienced during the procedure NRS 5 (IQR 2-7; = 0.49). Eight percent of the patients needed supplementary morphine during the ablation procedure. Sedation score did not differ during ablation, at arrival to or discharge from the recovery ward. Median periprocedural treatment time was 12 minutes (IQR 12-16). Treatment time did not correlate with experienced pain (=0.000074, = 0.96). The median length of stay in the recovery room was 120 minutes (IQR 84-154). There were seven serious adverse events. This proof-of-concept study has shown that analgosedation during percutaneous ablation of renal carcinoma can be performed with a generally tolerable degree of patient satisfaction. However, pain occurs and should be managed adequately. Patient safety must be a major concern for the anaesthetic care.
经皮肾肿瘤消融术通常是一种有利的治疗选择,特别是在患有合并症的老年患者中。此外,与传统的肾癌手术相比,它对资源的要求较低,因此可以假设这种手术的发生率可能会增加。在这种干预过程中需要进行镇痛。本研究的目的是探讨在经皮肾肿瘤消融术中应用镇静镇痛的可能性及其与患者舒适度和安全性的关系。46 名患者在右美托咪定和瑞芬太尼镇静的基础上,辅以浸润麻醉(利多卡因 1%),接受经皮(射频或微波)肾肿瘤消融术。患者预计疼痛强度为数字评分量表(NRS)4.5(四分位间距[IQR]3.5-5.5),略低于手术过程中的 NRS 5(IQR 2-7;=0.49)。8%的患者在消融过程中需要补充吗啡。在消融过程中,镇静评分在到达或离开恢复病房时没有差异。中位数的围手术期治疗时间为 12 分钟(IQR 12-16)。治疗时间与疼痛程度无相关性(=0.000074,=0.96)。恢复室的中位停留时间为 120 分钟(IQR 84-154)。有 7 例严重不良事件。这项概念验证研究表明,经皮肾肿瘤消融术中应用镇静镇痛可以获得普遍可接受的患者满意度。然而,疼痛是会发生的,应该得到适当的处理。患者安全必须是麻醉护理的主要关注点。