Spada Cristiano, Koulaouzidis Anastasios, Hassan Cesare, Amaro Pedro, Agrawal Anurag, Brink Lene, Fischbach Wolfgang, Hünger Matthias, Jover Rodrigo, Kinnunen Urpo, Ono Akiko, Patai Árpad, Pecere Silvia, Petruzziello Lucio, Riemann Jürgen F, Amlani Bharat, Staines Harry, Stringer Ann L, Toth Ervin, Antonelli Giulio, Fuccio Lorenzo
Digestive Endoscopy Unit and Gastroenterology, Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy.
Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Endosc Int Open. 2021 Sep 16;9(10):E1456-E1462. doi: 10.1055/a-1486-6729. eCollection 2021 Oct.
The European Colonoscopy Quality Investigation (ECQI) Group comprises expert colonoscopists and investigators with the aim of raising colonoscopy standards. We assessed the levels of monitoring and achievement of European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) performance measures (PMs) across Europe using responses to the ECQI questionnaires. The questionnaire comprises three forms: institution and practitioner questionnaires are completed once; a procedure questionnaire is completed on multiple occasions for individual total colonoscopies. ESGE PMs were approximated as closely as possible from the data collected via the procedure questionnaire. Procedure data could provide rate of adequate bowel preparation, cecal intubation rate (CIR), withdrawal time, polyp detection rate (PDR), and tattooing resection sites. We evaluated ECQI questionnaire data collected between June 2016 and April 2018, comprising 91 practitioner and 52 institution questionnaires. A total of 6445 completed procedure forms were received. Institution and practitioner responses indicate that routine recording of PMs is not widespread: adenoma detection rate (ADR) is routinely recorded in 29 % of institutions and by 34 % of practitioners; PDR by 42 % and 47 %, CIR by 62 % and 64 %, bowel preparation quality by 56 % and 76 %, respectively. Procedure data showed a rate of adequate bowel preparation of 84.2 %, CIR 73.4 %, PDR 40.5 %, mean withdrawal time 7.8 minutes and 12.2 % of procedures with possible removal of a non-pedunculated lesion ≥ 20 mm reporting tattooing. Our findings clearly show areas in need of quality improvement and the importance of promoting quality monitoring throughout the colonoscopy procedure.
欧洲结肠镜检查质量调查(ECQI)小组由专家级结肠镜检查医师和研究人员组成,旨在提高结肠镜检查标准。我们通过对ECQI问卷的回复,评估了欧洲胃肠内镜学会(ESGE)性能指标(PMs)在欧洲各地的监测水平和达成情况。该问卷包括三种形式:机构问卷和从业者问卷只需填写一次;针对个体全结肠镜检查的操作问卷需多次填写。通过操作问卷收集的数据尽可能接近ESGE的PMs。操作数据可提供充分肠道准备率、盲肠插管率(CIR)、退镜时间、息肉检出率(PDR)以及对切除部位进行标记的情况。我们评估了2016年6月至2018年4月期间收集的ECQI问卷数据,其中包括91份从业者问卷和52份机构问卷。共收到6445份完整的操作表格。机构和从业者的回复表明,PMs的常规记录并不普遍:腺瘤检出率(ADR)在29%的机构和34%的从业者中进行常规记录;PDR分别在42%和47%的机构和从业者中进行记录,CIR分别在62%和64%的机构和从业者中进行记录,肠道准备质量分别在56%和76%的机构和从业者中进行记录。操作数据显示,充分肠道准备率为84.2%,CIR为73.4%,PDR为40.5%,平均退镜时间为7.8分钟,12.2%的操作报告对可能切除的直径≥20mm的无蒂病变进行了标记。我们的研究结果清楚地表明了需要改进质量的领域,以及在整个结肠镜检查过程中促进质量监测的重要性。