Scott Greg, Clawson Jeff J, Gardett Isabel, Broadbent Meghan, Williams Nathan, Fivaz Conrad, Marshall Gigi, Barron Tracey, Olola Christopher
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2017 Jul-Aug;21(4):525-534. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2017.1302530. Epub 2017 Apr 14.
Chest pain is one of the most common reasons people seek emergency care-and one of the most critical. In the United States, chest pain is the second most common reason for emergency department (ED) visits. A patient's primary complaint of "chest pain" may reflect a broad range of underlying causes; therefore, it is important that emergency medical service (EMS) agencies gain a thorough understanding of these cases, beginning with the initial management of chest pain in the 9-1-1 center. The primary objective of this study was to compare hospital-confirmed patient discharge diagnoses to all calls handled by emergency medical dispatchers (EMDs) using the Chest Pain/Chest Discomfort (Non-Traumatic) Chief Complaint Protocol.
The retrospective descriptive study utilized emergency medical dispatch, EMS, and hospital datasets, collected at two emergency communication centers in North America, from January 1, 2013 to December 31, 2014. Patients who were dispatched using the Chest Pain/Chest Discomfort Chief Complaint Protocol and matched to hospital datasets were included. The primary outcome was the number and percentage of cases classified as ischemic heart disease (IHD), other cardiac-related conditions, or non-cardiac-related conditions associated with chest pain. We also evaluated the distribution of causes of chest pain across demographic indicators and dispatch determinants.
3,007 cases were identified as "chest pain" at dispatch for which corresponding hospital records were identified. Cases in the study were obtained by linking EMS/Hospital and Emergency Medical Dispatch datasets. Of these cases, 47.1% (n = 1,417) were due to cardiac-related causes of chest pain, 61.5% of which were Ischemic Heart Disease (IHD), while the rest had other cardiac-related causes. Of the IHDs, 32.1% were Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI).
Underlying causes of non-traumatic chest pain reported to 9-1-1 demonstrate a wide range of etiologies, with a mix similar to that of chest pain patients in several other healthcare settings, including hospital emergency departments. Most IHD events are triaged by EMDs to the (highest) DELTA priority level, while the CHARLIE level captures nearly all of the remaining IHD cases.
胸痛是人们寻求急诊治疗最常见的原因之一,也是最关键的原因之一。在美国,胸痛是急诊室就诊的第二大常见原因。患者的主要诉求“胸痛”可能反映了多种潜在病因;因此,紧急医疗服务(EMS)机构全面了解这些病例非常重要,这要从911中心对胸痛的初始处理开始。本研究的主要目的是使用胸痛/胸部不适(非创伤性)主诉协议,将医院确诊的患者出院诊断与紧急医疗调度员(EMD)处理的所有呼叫进行比较。
这项回顾性描述性研究利用了北美两个紧急通信中心在2013年1月1日至2014年12月31日期间收集的紧急医疗调度、EMS和医院数据集。纳入使用胸痛/胸部不适主诉协议调度并与医院数据集匹配的患者。主要结果是归类为缺血性心脏病(IHD)、其他心脏相关疾病或与胸痛相关的非心脏相关疾病的病例数量和百分比。我们还评估了胸痛原因在人口统计学指标和调度决定因素中的分布情况。
在调度时,有3007例被确定为“胸痛”,并找到了相应的医院记录。该研究中的病例是通过链接EMS/医院和紧急医疗调度数据集获得的。在这些病例中,47.1%(n = 1417)是由心脏相关的胸痛原因引起的,其中61.5%是缺血性心脏病(IHD),其余有其他心脏相关原因。在IHD病例中,32.1%是急性心肌梗死(AMI)。
向911报告的非创伤性胸痛的潜在原因显示出广泛的病因,其混合情况与包括医院急诊科在内的其他几个医疗环境中的胸痛患者相似。大多数IHD事件被EMD分诊到(最高)DELTA优先级,而CHARLIE级别涵盖了几乎所有其余的IHD病例。