Fissler Tim, Bientzle Martina, Cress Ulrike, Kimmerle Joachim
Leibniz-Institut fuer Wissensmedien, Knowledge Media Research Center, Knowledge Construction Lab, Tuebingen, Germany.
Department of Psychology, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
JMIR Cancer. 2015 Sep 8;1(2):e10. doi: 10.2196/cancer.4279.
Patients and advice seekers come to a medical consultation with typical needs, and physicians require adequate communication skills in order to address those needs effectively. It is largely unclear, however, to what extent advice seekers' attitudes toward a medical procedure or their resulting decisions are influenced by a physician's communication that ignores or explicitly takes these needs into account.
This experimental study tested how advice seekers' salient needs and doctor's communication styles influenced advice seekers' attitudes toward mammography screening and their decision whether or not to participate in this procedure.
One hundred women (age range 20-47 years, mean 25.22, SD 4.71) participated in an interactive role play of an online consultation. During the consultation, a fictitious, program-controlled physician provided information about advantages and disadvantages of mammography screening. The physician either merely communicated factual medical information or made additional comments using a communication style oriented toward advice seekers' typical needs for clarity and well-being. Orthogonal to this experimental treatment, participants' personal needs for clarity and for well-being were either made salient before or after the consultation with a needs questionnaire. We also measured all participants' attitudes toward mammography screening and their hypothetical decisions whether or not to participate before and after the experiment.
As assumed, the participants expressed strong needs for clarity (mean 4.57, SD 0.42) and for well-being (mean 4.21, SD 0.54) on 5-point Likert scales. Making these needs salient or not revealed significant interaction effects with the physician's communication style regarding participants' attitude change (F=7.23, P=.009, η=.073) and decision making (F=4.43, P=.038, η=.046). Those participants whose needs were made salient before the consultation responded to the physician's communication style, while participants without salient needs did not. When the physician used a need-oriented communication style, those participants with salient needs had a more positive attitude toward mammography after the consultation than before (mean 0.13, SD 0.54), while they changed their attitude in a negative direction when confronted with a purely fact-oriented communication style (mean -0.35, SD 0.80). The same applied to decision modification (need-oriented: mean 0.10, SD 0.99; fact-oriented: mean -0.30, SD 0.88).
The findings underline the importance of communicating in a need-oriented style with patients and advice seekers who are aware of their personal needs. Ignoring the needs of those people appears to be particularly problematic. So physicians' sensitivity for advice seekers' currently relevant needs is essential.
患者和咨询者带着典型需求前来就医,医生需要具备足够的沟通技巧才能有效满足这些需求。然而,很大程度上尚不清楚咨询者对医疗程序的态度或其最终决策在多大程度上会受到医生忽略或明确考虑这些需求的沟通方式的影响。
本实验研究旨在测试咨询者的突出需求和医生的沟通方式如何影响咨询者对乳腺钼靶筛查的态度以及他们是否参与该检查的决策。
100名女性(年龄范围20 - 47岁,平均25.22岁,标准差4.71)参与了在线咨询的互动角色扮演。在咨询过程中,一名虚拟的、程序控制的医生提供了乳腺钼靶筛查利弊的信息。医生要么只是传达客观的医学信息,要么采用一种针对咨询者对清晰性和幸福感的典型需求的沟通方式进行额外评论。与这种实验处理正交的是,通过需求问卷在咨询前或咨询后使参与者对清晰性和幸福感的个人需求变得突出。我们还测量了所有参与者在实验前后对乳腺钼靶筛查的态度以及他们关于是否参与的假设决策。
正如预期的那样,参与者在5分量表上表达了对清晰性(平均4.57,标准差0.42)和幸福感(平均4.21,标准差0.54)的强烈需求。使这些需求突出与否在参与者的态度变化(F = 7.23,P = 0.009,η = 0.073)和决策制定(F = 4.43,P = 0.038,η = 0.046)方面与医生的沟通方式显示出显著的交互作用。那些在咨询前需求变得突出的参与者对医生的沟通方式有反应,而需求未突出的参与者则没有。当医生采用以需求为导向的沟通方式时,那些需求突出的参与者在咨询后对乳腺钼靶筛查的态度比之前更积极(平均0.13,标准差0.54),而当面对纯粹以事实为导向的沟通方式时,他们的态度向负面方向转变(平均 - 0.35,标准差0.80)。这同样适用于决策改变(以需求为导向:平均0.10,标准差0.99;以事实为导向:平均 - 0.30,标准差0.88)。
研究结果强调了以需求为导向的方式与意识到自身个人需求的患者和咨询者进行沟通的重要性。忽视这些人的需求似乎特别成问题。因此,医生对咨询者当前相关需求的敏感度至关重要。