Suppr超能文献

ASSIST - 印度次大陆术后疼痛管理患者满意度调查

ASSIST - Patient satisfaction survey in postoperative pain management from Indian subcontinent.

作者信息

Subramanian Balavenkata, Shastri Naman, Aziz Lutful, Gopinath Ramachandran, Karlekar Anil, Mehta Yatin, Sharma Anand, Bapat Jitendra Suhas, Jain Pradeep, Jayant Aveek, Samra Tanvir, Perera Ajantha, Agarwal Anil, Shetty Vijay, Bhatnagar Sushma, Pandya Sunil T, Jain Paramanand

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesia, Ganga Medical Centre and Hospitals Pvt. Ltd., Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India.

Department of Anaesthesia, SAL Hospital, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India.

出版信息

J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2017 Jan-Mar;33(1):40-47. doi: 10.4103/joacp.JOACP_245_16.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

To compare pain scores at rest and ambulation and to assess patient satisfaction between the different modalities of pain management at different time points after surgery.

SETTINGS AND DESIGN

The ASSIST (Patient Satisfaction Survey: Pain Management) was an investigator-initiated, prospective, multicenter survey conducted among 1046 postoperative patients from India.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Pain scores, patient's and caregiver's satisfaction toward postoperative pain treatment, and overall pain management at the hospital were captured at three different time points through a specially designed questionnaire. The survey assessed if the presence of acute pain services (APSs) leads to better pain scores and patient satisfaction scores.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

One-way ANOVA was used to evaluate the statistical significance between different modalities of pain management, and paired -test was used to compare pain and patient satisfaction scores between the APS and non-APS groups.

RESULTS

The results indicated that about 88.4% of patients reported postoperative pain during the first 24 h after surgery. The mean pain score at rest on a scale of 1-10 was 2.3 ± 1.8 during the first 24 h after surgery and 1.1 ± 1.5 at 72 h; the patient satisfaction was 7.9/10. Significant pain relief from all pain treatment was reported by patients in the non-APS group (81.6%) compared with those in the APS (77.8%) group ( < 0.0016).

CONCLUSION

This investigator-initiated survey from the Indian subcontinent demonstrates that current standards of care in postoperative pain management remain suboptimal and that APS service, wherever it exists, is yet to reach its full potential.

摘要

引言

比较静息和活动时的疼痛评分,并评估术后不同时间点不同疼痛管理方式下患者的满意度。

设置与设计

ASSIST(患者满意度调查:疼痛管理)是一项由研究者发起的前瞻性多中心调查,在印度的1046例术后患者中进行。

材料与方法

通过一份专门设计的问卷,在三个不同时间点收集疼痛评分、患者及护理人员对术后疼痛治疗的满意度以及对医院整体疼痛管理的满意度。该调查评估了急性疼痛服务(APS)的存在是否能带来更好的疼痛评分和患者满意度评分。

统计分析

采用单因素方差分析评估不同疼痛管理方式之间的统计学显著性,采用配对检验比较APS组和非APS组之间的疼痛和患者满意度评分。

结果

结果表明,约88.4%的患者在术后首24小时内报告有术后疼痛。术后首24小时静息时的平均疼痛评分(1 - 10分制)为2.3±1.8,72小时时为1.1±1.5;患者满意度为7.9/10。与APS组(77.8%)相比,非APS组(81.6%)的患者报告所有疼痛治疗均有显著疼痛缓解(P<0.0016)。

结论

这项来自印度次大陆的研究者发起的调查表明,术后疼痛管理的当前护理标准仍不理想,且无论何处存在APS服务,其潜力尚未完全发挥。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验